fizzelopeguss
Member
(06-05-2012, 12:20 AM)

fizzelopeguss's Avatar
#451

Don't expect it for atleast another 6 months to a year. That's how much work the game needs.

In fact i'd say it needs a fast turn around expansion like LoD, but i can't see that happening.
FLEABttn
needs to fix his kismet
(06-05-2012, 01:07 AM)

FLEABttn's Avatar
#452

Originally Posted by fizzelopeguss: View Post
Don't expect it for atleast another 6 months to a year. That's how much work the game needs.

In fact i'd say it needs a fast turn around expansion like LoD, but i can't see that happening.
Yeah, that's not a widely held opinion.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(06-05-2012, 01:09 AM)

iceatcs's Avatar
#453

Originally Posted by OldJadedGamer: View Post
This is one of those announcements that will be big to a lot of people except for me.
Of course.
StickSoldier
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:09 AM)

StickSoldier's Avatar
#454

good lucky playing inferno on a ps3 controller, shit is fuckin retarded hard.
Herbspicesoy
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:23 AM)
#455

If true this is going to be a very dumbed down version, simply because of this
Quote:
Diablo III is completely littered with abilities that are aimed on the mouse cursor and the back end of the game is very fast, requires a ton of precision and kiting and has a lot of one shot kills.
nintendoman58
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:24 AM)

nintendoman58's Avatar
#456

Holy shit, I was considering to buy this game now, but this might change everhything.
scorpscarx
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:26 AM)

scorpscarx's Avatar
#457

Originally Posted by Revolutionary: View Post
Diablo III? No. The first two? Yes.
Agreed 100% unfortunately.
shinra-bansho
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:26 AM)

shinra-bansho's Avatar
#458

Originally Posted by OldJadedGamer: View Post
This is one of those announcements that will be big to a lot of people except for me.
This seems to be objectively relatively "big" news, even if it doesn't subjectively excite.

What exactly would be "big" for you...?
tch
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:39 AM)
#459

As much as I want it to be ps3/vita, the always-online aspect of the game makes a vita version much less likely.
Burekma
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:46 AM)

Burekma's Avatar
#460

Originally Posted by Herbspicesoy: View Post
If true this is going to be a very dumbed down version, simply because of this
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.
antonz
Member
(06-05-2012, 04:22 AM)

antonz's Avatar
#461

Originally Posted by Cyntec: View Post
Here we go: http://www.redcoon.de/B362894-Blizza...iele-Adventure. Set for 2012.

Sources say it will be offically announced later today.
So about those sources. Same sources who said 30 vita games?
rouken
Member
(06-05-2012, 04:24 AM)

rouken's Avatar
#462

yeah, this was a long shot. not even hinted at the least.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(06-05-2012, 04:27 AM)

iceatcs's Avatar
#463

Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
So about those sources. Same sources who said 30 vita games?
Eh, it is german online shop link in OP.

Or you mean Cyntec's source?
antonz
Member
(06-05-2012, 04:30 AM)

antonz's Avatar
#464

Originally Posted by iceatcs: View Post
Eh, it is german online shop link in OP.

Or you mean Cyntec's source?
Cyntec repeatedly said he had sources and couldnt say more or he would lose his head etc
intheinbetween
Member
(06-05-2012, 07:06 AM)

intheinbetween's Avatar
#465

come on! since when has Redcoon become a reliable source for game leaks?

they're a well-known cheap online electronic retailer here in Spain, but only for tvs, digital cameras, stand alone players, audio devices, toasters, fridges and some gadgets, but games??? lol
darkwing
Member
(06-05-2012, 07:07 AM)

darkwing's Avatar
#466

Originally Posted by intheinbetween: View Post
come on! since when has Redcoon become a reliable source for game leaks?

they're a well-known cheap online electronic retailer here in Spain, but only for tvs, digital cameras, stand alone players, audio devices, toasters, fridges and some gadgets, but games??? lol
games journalism
Captain Tuttle
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:33 PM)

Captain Tuttle's Avatar
#467

Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
Cyntec repeatedly said he had sources and couldnt say more or he would lose his head etc
So what happened Cyntec?
SparkTR
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:39 PM)

SparkTR's Avatar
#468

So are we waiting for Activisions conference or is this rumor debunked?
LOVE & TRUTH
Banned
(06-05-2012, 01:46 PM)
#469

Originally Posted by SparkTR: View Post
So are we waiting for Activisions conference or is this rumor debunked?
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?
SparkTR
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:48 PM)

SparkTR's Avatar
#470

Originally Posted by LOVE & TRUTH: View Post
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?
This rumour in the OP:

Originally Posted by Cyntec:
Sources say it will be offically announced later today.
Sho_Nuff82
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:51 PM)

Sho_Nuff82's Avatar
#471

Originally Posted by LOVE & TRUTH: View Post
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?
If Diablo was coming to PS3 or Vita, don't you think Sony would have mentioned it alongside Call of Duty?
LOVE & TRUTH
Banned
(06-05-2012, 01:54 PM)
#472

Originally Posted by SparkTR: View Post
This rumour in the OP:
Oh, that rumor.

Still, the point stands - at least two Internet outlets have recently listed Diablo 3 as a PS3 exclusive.
StoppedInTracks
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:56 PM)

StoppedInTracks's Avatar
#473

Every year before Diablo 3 was out there was this rumour that WoW for console will be announced "any day now" during E3 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.

I guess we can expect Diablo 3 on PS4 to be shown on next years E3 then!
LOVE & TRUTH
Banned
(06-05-2012, 01:56 PM)
#474

Originally Posted by Sho_Nuff82: View Post
If Diablo was coming to PS3 or Vita, don't you think Sony would have mentioned it alongside Call of Duty?
I don't know - maybe the game is still too far away from release. It just doesn't debunk the rumor, that's all.
Leonsito
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:59 PM)

Leonsito's Avatar
#475

Didn't we have a rule which said that people with "insider sources" could get banned if they don't come out true?
spirity
Member
(06-05-2012, 01:59 PM)

spirity's Avatar
#476

Originally Posted by Burekma: View Post
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.
I'd be really pissed if they did that. Unless I can somehow trade in my digital copy for the ps3 version.

Seriously, the loot in D3 is rubbish. I played my DH for 2 hours, went from lvl 21 to 23 in that time, and had 5 rares drop. Level on the loot? 8, 8, 8, 12, 12. What use is a lvl 8 rare to my lvl 21? And that's just the rares. I've got a lvl 55 Barb, saw one legendary when I was lvl 18 (it was for a lvl 8). Not seen one since. Never saw a single set item and whenever I do come across an upgrade it's so marginal you just feel meh. There's no fun modifiers in anything I'm picking up. It's just bland as hell.

You are supposed to be excited to see a rare item. You are supposed to be excited to get an upgrade. That does not happen in Diablo 3. In the Torchlight 2 beta I had a stack of cool, interesting loot that had cool, interesting effects and modifiers and it was all stuff pertinent to my level.

The combat and classes in Diablo 3 are great. The skill system is sweet. But the loot? Its abysmal, and seeing as how the loot is the driving factor for playing a loot-centric arpg like this, it overshadows all of D3's good points (of which there are many).

And yeah, the reason the loot is so shit is because of that Auction House.
maquiladora
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:00 PM)

maquiladora's Avatar
#477

Why wouldn't they mention this in the conference if it was coming?

Seriously have my doubts.
Blablurn
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:00 PM)

Blablurn's Avatar
#478

im sure even the website owner was surprised about that dramatic high hit count yesterday.
Horsemama1956
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:01 PM)

Horsemama1956's Avatar
#479

Originally Posted by Burekma: View Post
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.
It would play like shit though, so I fail to see how it would be the superior version? Diablo 3 is quite a bit faster and has a lot more going on then Diablo 2, and frankly I don't think the PS3 could handle it. The framerate would be crap or they would have to remove half the onscreen enemies.

They would also have to rework the FOV because it's hard to see little details like loot on an HDTV with the standard view, which would make ranged characters a chore.
freddy
(06-05-2012, 02:22 PM)

freddy's Avatar
#480

Originally Posted by Blablurn: View Post
im sure even the website owner was surprised about that dramatic high hit count yesterday.
I'm sure that's exactly what they were expecting. That's why it's still such a popular thing do after so many years.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(06-05-2012, 02:25 PM)

iceatcs's Avatar
#481

Originally Posted by Blablurn: View Post
im sure even the website owner was surprised about that dramatic high hit count yesterday.
They might have to pay all the bandwidth bill. hehe
Bboy AJ
Talks to himself
(06-05-2012, 02:35 PM)

Bboy AJ's Avatar
#482

OP is a dbag.
ari
Loves his teams like he loves his trading cards
(06-05-2012, 02:36 PM)

ari's Avatar
#483

why would diablo 3 come on the ps3? makes no since.
elty
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:36 PM)
#484

I find it skeptical. It woukd been such a megaton that make no sense to leave out from the main E3 presentation.
gate777
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:47 PM)

gate777's Avatar
#485

Hopefully this is true. I want controller support. Constant clicking with a mouse makes my wrist hurt.
Hari Seldon
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:47 PM)

Hari Seldon's Avatar
#486

Lol this isn't happening, not for a while.
knee
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:52 PM)

knee's Avatar
#487

The first Diablo was on PSX-- not sure how good of a version it was though.
YoungHav
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:53 PM)

YoungHav's Avatar
#488

Please Load Jesus make this true. Platinum trophy or die.
Cheech
Member
(06-05-2012, 02:56 PM)

Cheech's Avatar
#489

Originally Posted by knee: View Post
The first Diablo was on PSX-- not sure how good of a version it was though.
It was horrid.

This is one of those games that really needs to be reworked for controller support. Like an RTS, you're never going to get the kind of precision you need with a gamepad.
Rad-
Member
(06-05-2012, 03:07 PM)

Rad-'s Avatar
#490

Activision Blizzard leaving out 360? Smh at anyone for believing this.
StoppedInTracks
Member
(06-05-2012, 03:34 PM)

StoppedInTracks's Avatar
#491

Originally Posted by Leonsito: View Post
Didn't we have a rule which said that people with "insider sources" could get banned if they don't come out true?
I think there is yes. Those guys need to PM mods proof (showmethereceipts.gif) or go bye-bye to the la-la land.