MYE
formerly Cheesus
(06-04-2012, 10:37 AM)

MYE's Avatar
#151

Originally Posted by Cyntec: View Post
You, sir, obvioulsy forgot about the Vita's capabilities :D
I dont have a Vita. But yeah, it would be a fantastic addition for the system
Brad Grenz
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:37 AM)

Brad Grenz's Avatar
#152

Originally Posted by rSpooky: View Post
If so ....I will buy again.. If there is a vita release then I will by it for that as well :p .
Off course it would be really nice if it has a steam like account integration that lets me crossplay/use my current characters.
I think that's exactly how it will work. You won't have to buy multiple copies, either. If you own the game on Battle.net you will have access to downloadable clients for every version. Your characters will be persistent, but you can only log in to one system at a time. Co-op across all versions, too, since the server will be client agnostic.
Hanmik
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:37 AM)

Hanmik's Avatar
#153

a danish site has had Diablo 3 for PS3 and X360 listed..

PS3: https://www.coolshop.dk/catalog/prod...ablo_iii_3_ps3
X360 : https://www.coolshop.dk/catalog/prod...blo_iii_3_x360
ColdBlooder
Banned
(06-04-2012, 10:38 AM)
#154

Still not getting a ps3. PC version runs pretty well on slower PCs afaik.
OneMoreQuestion
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:38 AM)

OneMoreQuestion's Avatar
#155

Originally Posted by Brad Grenz: View Post
I think that's exactly how it will work. You won't have to buy multiple copies, either. If you own the game on Battle.net you will have access to downloadable clients for every version. Your characters will be persistent, but you can only log in to one system at a time. Co-op across all versions, too, since the server will be client agnostic.
Then how's Sony gonna take a cut?
Slime
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:39 AM)

Slime's Avatar
#156

Originally Posted by Hanmik: View Post
Makes it slightly more believable, I suppose.
Xyphie
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:40 AM)

Xyphie's Avatar
#157

Trying to figure out how you'd map skills with variable range (Leap, Fire Bomb etc) to a controller in a way that isn't clunky and imprecise as fuck. How does Torchlight XBLA do it?
Kem0sabe
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:40 AM)

Kem0sabe's Avatar
#158

Wondering how it will be possible for the ps3 port to look even shitier than the pc version, dunno how but this being the ps3... itīs almost a certainty. ;)
LOVE & TRUTH
Banned
(06-04-2012, 10:41 AM)
#159

Originally Posted by Hanmik: View Post
Play-Asia only has the PS3 version listed:

http://www.play-asia.com/Diablo_III/...n-70-49o3.html
DieH@rd
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:41 AM)

DieH@rd's Avatar
#160

Originally Posted by Pezking: View Post

If the gameplay is still similar to the first one, this shouldn't be a problem, right?
Yes its still very simmilar, only you have more combat options and best coop experience of all time.
earvcunanan
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:42 AM)

earvcunanan's Avatar
#161

Originally Posted by Xyphie: View Post
Trying to figure out how you'd map skills with variable range (Leap, Fire Bomb etc) to a controller in a way that isn't clunky and imprecise as fuck. How does Torchlight XBLA do it?
I'd imagine it'd be like Dragon's Dogma's layout:

Hold L1 to pull up your primary skills, then press either square, triangle or circle to use a skill. Secondary skills, hold R1.
SparkTR
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:42 AM)

SparkTR's Avatar
#162

Is there any way to tell when these store entries were put up?
Computer
Down with capitalism
(06-04-2012, 10:43 AM)

Computer's Avatar
#163

I can't wait for more server outages!
Alex
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:43 AM)

Alex's Avatar
#164

Originally Posted by Xyphie: View Post
Trying to figure out how you'd map skills with variable range (Leap, Fire Bomb etc) to a controller in a way that isn't clunky and imprecise as fuck. How does Torchlight XBLA do it?
Torchlight does it how you think and by being a far, far easier and slower paced game where the precision and muck ups don't really matter. If Torchlight II came to XBLA, it might be a different story, since I hear it's taking the difficulty concerns of the original into mind

Quote:
I'd imagine it'd be like Dragon's Dogma's layout:

Hold L1 to pull up your primary skills, then press either square, triangle or circle to use a skill. Secondary skills, hold R1.
He's talking about aiming while moving on the fly. Diablo III is completely littered with abilities that are aimed on the mouse cursor and the back end of the game is very fast, requires a ton of precision and kiting and has a lot of one shot kills. It's the same concerns as a MOBA-title. Trying to play in a MOBA game with a controller is very possible but it could not be tuned in the same way as on a PC, you'd be wrecked in a way that would make FPS control variances look cute.

It's going to take retuning (or simply advising people to plug a mouse into their PS3 which they won't do), so I sincerely doubt itll be platform agnostic regardless of being off of Battle.net.

I've heard "but the Wii-U pad!" a few times, and provided that actually wound up even slightly comfortable using it with a stylus or something, Diablo III has six hotkeys for skills, another for potions and then all of its movement and interface features, so you'd basically be pulling another Kid Icarus but by a developer who wouldnt stand for it. It'll be retuned for analog, which would be rad as fuck on the Vita, that might push me to get one if it happened.
Last edited by Alex; 06-04-2012 at 10:53 AM.
Brad Grenz
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:43 AM)

Brad Grenz's Avatar
#165

Originally Posted by OneMoreQuestion: View Post
Then how's Sony gonna take a cut?
From retail and PSN sales of their versions. That will still be millions sold, enough to justify the deal.
thuway
Banned
(06-04-2012, 10:44 AM)

thuway's Avatar
#166

No way is it exclusie. However, if this comes to Vita- talk about a killer app.
Rflagg
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:48 AM)

Rflagg's Avatar
#167

I could easily see this coming to ps3/xb360, but I would be pretty surprised if it was exclusive to one of them.
Galvanise_
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:48 AM)

Galvanise_'s Avatar
#168

Maybe John Hight is pulling some strings over at Blizzard.
bjaelke
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:49 AM)

bjaelke's Avatar
#169

Originally Posted by Hanmik: View Post
Both versions have been up for a very long time. If I recall correctly then Coolshop listed those around the same time the job listings for a console version was revealed.
thuway
Banned
(06-04-2012, 10:49 AM)

thuway's Avatar
#170

Originally Posted by ColdBlooder: View Post
Still not getting a ps3. PC version runs pretty well on slower PCs afaik.
LOL
Cyntec
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:50 AM)

Cyntec's Avatar
#171

Originally Posted by maquiladora: View Post
An NDA'd journalist at CVG said there would be 2 big surprises at the Sony conference, one of them would be David Cage's new game which he admitted because it had already sort of beeen outted (he said that could probably be game of the show) but he was more coy about the other news, just saying something like gamers would be pleased and surprised. This would fit with that.
MS has some _big_ surprise as well: They are working on [THIS PART HAS BEEN CENSORED DUE TO NDA RESTRICTIONS]!! Amazing, isn't it? :) Let's say, it isn't something entirely new in general, but I wouldn't have seen this coming. But enough said, I want to keep my head on its neck for at least a few more years :)
chickdigger802
Junior Member
(06-04-2012, 10:50 AM)

chickdigger802's Avatar
#172

Vita would be interesting. ps3 version... meh who cares?

Diablo 3 can run ~30fps on my shitty integrated graphics laptop. No excuses kids. And some of the higher difficulties is most definitely not the 'chill on the couch' experience imo.
ShironRedshift
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:50 AM)

ShironRedshift's Avatar
#173

Originally Posted by GazzaScotland: View Post
While Diablo is a huge franchise, just how well would it really do on consoles? To me it seems its one of those games that if people really wanted it they would have picked up for the PC, and in that sense it doesn't make sense limiting the market down further to one console.

Shall be interesting to see how it plays out though.
That's pretty much my thinking. I mean, it could have been huge on consoles, but if it is coming now, it will essentially just be a late port, meaning most of the people who wanted the game would have already picked it up on PC. Add to that there's no real significant advantages a PS3/360 version would offer (the visuals wouldn't be any more impressive, and it's not like the PS360 are portable or anything either), so there would seem to be little incentive to double dip, as it would quite literally be the same game you've already played. So yeah, I'm not sure exactly what people mean when they're saying that this would be a mega-ton. Sure, it would be great to have the game on more platforms, but I'm just not sure how well Diablo III console ports would do at this point--they'd do alright for themselves, surely, but I'm not sure they'd be able to go beyond just alright.

Now, if it were to get a Vita version on the other hand... That could quite possibly be an entirely different story. But HD Twin ports? Eh... If they were released alongside the PC version, maybe, but now, I'm just not sure. The series's audience is on PC--expecting HD Twin ports of the game to do exceptionally well just seems like people expecting the PS3 version of Mass Effect 3 to do exceptionally well, despite that series building up its audience on 360. And sure enough, the 360 version decimated the PS3's numbers. Seems to be the same situation here--just don't really feel the hype for it.
Last edited by ShironRedshift; 06-04-2012 at 10:56 AM.
plainr_
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:50 AM)

plainr_'s Avatar
#174

If true, Sony sucks at keeping secrets. Like the absolute worse.
Last edited by plainr_; 06-04-2012 at 10:58 AM.
Thoraxes
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:50 AM)

Thoraxes's Avatar
#175

If true, I just hope it's not cross-platform.
Alx
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:53 AM)

Alx's Avatar
#176

Originally Posted by Pezking: View Post
Is it thinkable that the PS3 version allows a pure offline experience?
If the gameplay is still similar to the first one, this shouldn't be a problem, right?
I suppose it wouldn't be a problem, technically at least : there would still be an outrage from all the PC players who asked for an offline experience, and met answers about the game being "multiplayer at its core". :P
JJD
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:53 AM)

JJD's Avatar
#177

Originally Posted by Thoraxes: View Post
If true, I just hope it's not cross-platform.
Co op could be cross platform, PvP would be a slaughter house! Lol!
LOVE & TRUTH
Banned
(06-04-2012, 10:53 AM)
#178

Originally Posted by chickdigger802: View Post
Diablo 3 can run ~30fps on my shitty integrated graphics laptop. No excuses kids.
The comfy couch is my excuse.
Jtrizzy
Junior Member
(06-04-2012, 10:53 AM)

Jtrizzy's Avatar
#179

As someone who went from ps3 to pc over the last year, I have to say that Bilzzard does an amazing job of scaling the difficulty, and doing great tutorials in the game and on the web. I was never big on Dota 2, lol, or hon, but D3 and SC2 are great for people who just want to have fun and not worry about the endless complexities of some of these types of games.
Kingsgoon
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:54 AM)

Kingsgoon's Avatar
#180

Would be nice to play Diablo 3 with a controller.
UnluckyKate
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:54 AM)

UnluckyKate's Avatar
#181

Originally Posted by plainr_: View Post
If true, Sony sucks at keeping secrets.
Welcome to Sony, leaking all it's annoucement the weeks before E3.
Xpliskin
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:54 AM)

Xpliskin's Avatar
#182

so Sony managed to strike an exclusivity with Blizzard ?
Which in its history has never done that ?

I don't believe this.
Gustav
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:55 AM)

Gustav's Avatar
#183

Originally Posted by UnluckyKate: View Post
Welcome to Sony, leaking all it's annoucement the weeks before E3.
Shit, I thought E3 was tomorrow.

Edit: Today in Ewrope.
Thoraxes
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:55 AM)

Thoraxes's Avatar
#184

Originally Posted by JJD: View Post
Co op could be cross platform, PvP would be a slaughter house! Lol!
Grinding on all those controller-users!

You have a point.
gundamkyoukai
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:55 AM)

gundamkyoukai's Avatar
#185

I don't see this happening but if does good for Sony .
If they can get it on Vita that would really help it compare to ps3.
Cyntec
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:55 AM)

Cyntec's Avatar
#186

Originally Posted by plainr_: View Post
If true, Sony sucks at keeping secrets.
No shit, Sherlock.
Alex
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:56 AM)

Alex's Avatar
#187

Originally Posted by JJD: View Post
Co op could be cross platform, PvP would be a slaughter house! Lol!
If they let controller players into PC tuned Inferno it would basically ruin the game and there would be massive backlash and whining, and I say this as a controller fantard who plays my PC FPS's with controllers when I can :lol I know, blasphemy.

I really think it'll be platform specific or limited in some manner.

Quote:
so Sony managed to strike an exclusivity with Blizzard ?
Which in its history has never done that ?
Microsoft is pretty notorious nowadays for being rigid with their online structure. After Valves dealings with Sony and Portal 2 and other stuff like the Eve spinoff and the general open nature of the platform, it seems more plausible, to me.

With how successful a lot of online and F2P and unique models a lot of genuinely awesome PC games use nowadays, itd be a good thing for a console maker to be progressive on.
Last edited by Alex; 06-04-2012 at 10:59 AM.
michaelius
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:58 AM)
#188

Originally Posted by chickdigger802: View Post
Vita would be interesting. ps3 version... meh who cares?

Diablo 3 can run ~30fps on my shitty integrated graphics laptop. No excuses kids. And some of the higher difficulties is most definitely not the 'chill on the couch' experience imo.
If vita version allowed gaming using 3D i'd double dip :)
Gustav
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:59 AM)

Gustav's Avatar
#189

Originally Posted by michaelius: View Post
If vita version allowed gaming using 3D i'd double dip :)
I think you're confusing the Vita with the 3DS?!?!
Cyntec
Member
(06-04-2012, 10:59 AM)

Cyntec's Avatar
#190

Originally Posted by Cyntec: View Post
MS has some _big_ surprise as well: They are working on [THIS PART HAS BEEN CENSORED DUE TO NDA RESTRICTIONS]!! Amazing, isn't it? :) Let's say, it isn't something entirely new in general, but I wouldn't have seen this coming. But enough said, I want to keep my head on its neck for at least a few more years :)
Oh.
http://www.examiner.com/article/micr...-this-years-e3
chickdigger802
Junior Member
(06-04-2012, 11:05 AM)

chickdigger802's Avatar
#191

Originally Posted by Alex: View Post
If they let controller players into PC tuned Inferno it would basically ruin the game and there would be massive backlash and whining, and I say this as a controller fantard who plays my PC FPS's with controllers when I can :lol I know, blasphemy.

I really think it'll be platform specific or limited in some manner.
you saying diablo would be easier to play with controller over M+K?

was it like that for the ps1 port?
Thoraxes
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:08 AM)

Thoraxes's Avatar
#192

Originally Posted by chickdigger802: View Post
you saying diablo would be easier to play with controller over M+K?

was it like that for the ps1 port?
I think it's closer to they'll have to reduce the difficulty to compensate for the controller.
AllenShrz
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:10 AM)

AllenShrz's Avatar
#193

If you really want to play Diablo 3 that hard you could.. you know... play it on a PC?

Diablo 3 even run on toasters, it not the power-hungry PC title.
m0dus
(06-04-2012, 11:11 AM)

m0dus's Avatar
#194

I'd be truly surprised if it was exclusive, based simply on the fact that only one obscure German retailer has listed it, I'd rather think blizzard would be more concerned with maximizing profits and thus hitting as many platforms as possible...
Alex
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:11 AM)

Alex's Avatar
#195

Originally Posted by chickdigger802: View Post
you saying diablo would be easier to play with controller over M+K?

was it like that for the ps1 port?
No, I'm saying, even as someone who champions as much controller use as possible, that the back end of Diablo III would be completely unplayable on a controller without a lot of retuning that would make for it's own, specific version.

You can totally make it work on a controller perfectly fine, you just can't put it on the same version as PC, it'd be like dumping a controller user into a damn DOTA 2/LoL PC match on Inferno. It's all skill shots and high speed kiting and quick gibs.

I think they'll do this, personally, and I dont find it surprising if Sony was the main benefactor of the console versions of it (but probably not exclusive). Still considering they're rushing to even keep up with the tuning and jitters on the PC version I can imagine it being deep into 2013 or 14 if and when it does occur. I really figured if Diablo III came to consoles it would be PS4/720/whatever or the such, so they could get it running at 60 FPS too.
Last edited by Alex; 06-04-2012 at 11:18 AM.
NemesisPrime
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:11 AM)

NemesisPrime's Avatar
#196

Unlikely.
AHA-Lambda
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:13 AM)

AHA-Lambda's Avatar
#197

Constant connection to PSN/Xbox LIVE? =/
GavinGT
Banned
(06-04-2012, 11:13 AM)

GavinGT's Avatar
#198

People are crazy if they think Blizzard would take only 6 months to surmount all the hurdles involved in porting this to a console. 2015 sounds more likely to me than 2012.
Cyntec
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:17 AM)

Cyntec's Avatar
#199

Originally Posted by m0dus: View Post
I'd be truly surprised if it was exclusive, based simply on the fact that only one obscure German retailer has listed it, I'd rather think blizzard would be more concerned with maximizing profits and thus hitting as many platforms as possible...
this "obscure" retailer is actually the online presentation of Germanys biggest retailer for electronic devices: Media Markt. Its like Best Buy in Germany :)
Cartman86
Member
(06-04-2012, 11:18 AM)

Cartman86's Avatar
#200

Originally Posted by GavinGT: View Post
People are crazy if they think Blizzard would take only 6 months to surmount all the hurdles involved in porting this to a console. 2015 sounds more likely to me than 2012.
6 months is more likely than 3 years. But either way this is bullshit.