Notrollious
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)

Notrollious's Avatar
#101

Originally Posted by Technosteve: View Post
why is ATI winning all these designs?
IIRC it's because their architecture is more efficient and less power hungry than Nvidia's counterparts, at least they were when I got my last card.
Pandemic
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)

Pandemic's Avatar
#102

Can they just shove these parts into a box, and start selling the PS4, and have a manual on how to construct your PS4...

I need next-gen consoles!
elfinke
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)

elfinke's Avatar
#103

Originally Posted by everthustodeadbeats: View Post
Don't be a bellend.

Oops, too late.
How do you follow football without a sense of humour, man? C'mon. Sheesh.

Originally Posted by Digishine: View Post
psx-sense is a fan blog site. They already came up with news that ended up lies.
Ahhh! This is what I was waiting for. Websites with hyphens in their name are rarely good for you.
painful fart
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:05 AM)

painful fart's Avatar
#104

Originally Posted by onQ123: View Post
Edit: can a mod change SOC to APU in the title?

http://translate.google.nl/translate...ecificaties%2F

google translate from psx-sense is this a trusted site?
"it will have a maximum output of 1080"
Fake spec is fake.
Yenrot
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:05 AM)

Yenrot's Avatar
#105

You'll never walk alone, Sony.
Durante
I'm taking it FROM here
(06-08-2012, 12:06 AM)

Durante's Avatar
#106

Originally Posted by Notrollious: View Post
IIRC it's because their architecture is more efficient and less power hungry than Nvidia's counterparts, at least they were when I got my last card.
That's no longer true, but it was true when they would have had these design wins. But only in GPUs, not CPUs.
iamshadowlark
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:06 AM)

iamshadowlark's Avatar
#107

Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
That pretty much kills the rumor then. 7950 at the 800mhz clock is pushing almost 3000GFLOPs and of course the 7970 is pushing almost 4000
I doubt it would be in a retail configuration. Surely they would remove ALUs.
Zophar
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:06 AM)

Zophar's Avatar
#108

Originally Posted by ASTROID2: View Post
Sony overpowering again. *sigh* I was hoping they would do something different. I hope this isn't true.
I thought we were complaining that this generation's consoles hit their limits prematurely and haven't been powerful enough to keep up relative to past cycles?
Glorified G
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:07 AM)

Glorified G's Avatar
#109

Originally Posted by Lord Error: View Post
Almost every 'rumour' (as in, coming from the developers with devkit access, so not really a rumour) has matched what this post described. Steamroller CPU, ~1.7-1.8GFlop GPU, 2GB of unified RAM. That's almost assuredly what the devkit is right now, or was a few months ago.


No, I really doubt that.
If your saying that's for the discrete gpu, as long as they bump up the ram to 4, I'm satisfied.
Last edited by Glorified G; 06-08-2012 at 12:09 AM.
USC-fan
aka Kbsmoker
(06-08-2012, 12:07 AM)
#110

Originally Posted by 2MF: View Post
Even if we ignore the cost (five hundred and ninety nine US dollars) , this GPU has a 230 W TDP... That would be fun on a console.

For reference, the whole PS3 used about 200 W back at launch.
Yes the retail system. This could be dev kit hardware. The ps3 dev had sli nvidia cards[6800 ultras] in the early dev kits. tpd of these gpus are over that....
Notrollious
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:08 AM)

Notrollious's Avatar
#111

Originally Posted by Durante: View Post
That's no longer true, but it was true when they would have had these design wins. But only in GPUs, not CPUs.
Well, yeah. The HD 6000 series was far more efficient than Nvidia's counterparts... Which is what I'm going to guess will be in the next generation of consoles.

As for AMD CPU's: LOL.
antonz
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:08 AM)

antonz's Avatar
#112

Originally Posted by iamshadowlark: View Post
I doubt it would be in a retail configuration. Surely they would remove ALUs.
Would make no sense to take a 7970 or something then basically remove half of its performance.
specialguy
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:09 AM)
#113

Quote:
The GPU is an ATI r10xx at 800MHz with 1843 GFLOPS, this is code-named "Tahiti." This chip is also include on AMD Radeon HD 7970, both chips (CPU and GPU) are 28nm processors.
Tahiti is over 3 teraflops, so this rumor isn't internally consistent. Link here http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/15/2...oard-memory-3w

I suppose it's possible this rumor has truth too it, and the site just got the name of the gpu wrong, but it is a 1.8 teraflop GPU.

Because I had heard the PS4 had a better GPU but less RAM than Durango, and that Durango had a 1-1.5 TF GPU. So all that fits, for whatever tiny bit it's worth, which isn't much.

It's all likely too much for a SOC too. Most likely it's just balony.
Last edited by specialguy; 06-08-2012 at 12:17 AM.
ghst
thanks for the laugh
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)

ghst's Avatar
#114

a 7970 bolted on to a 3.2 ghz quad core as part of an apu?

you know why you'd only be getting less than half the 3.8 tflops you'd expect from a 7970? because it would be on fire.

the source also states that ps4 was going to be a announced at e3 until the gpu threw a last minute spanner in the works (which was the only reason for the underwhelming conference, duhhhh).

sonyfriend fanfiction. good for a quick tug but don't propose to it or anything.
v1oz
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)

v1oz's Avatar
#115

Originally Posted by ASTROID2: View Post
Sony overpowering again. *sigh* I was hoping they would do something different. I hope this isn't true.
No the real issue here is abandoning CELL. When for years we were being told CELL was the future of all things. And that CELL would be in everything from televisions to toasters.
Durante
I'm taking it FROM here
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)

Durante's Avatar
#116

Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
Would make no sense to take a 7970 or something then basically remove half of its performance.
Depending on the situation, it could make sense. With a console you're not limited to off-the-shelf parts. You can customize the desired feature set, performance, cost and thermal envelope.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)
#117

[QUOTE=antonz;38657413]Indeed. For it to be a tahiti based gpu in that range it would have to be a 7850 likely.
Quote:
1843GFlop makes it a somewhat more than 7850 but much less than 7870, which is 2500GFl.

And going with Steamroller for the CPU would be pretty odd. AMD has all but admitted defeat in CPU for the high end
CPU may not be such a huge deal, it's not like the machine will be used for scientific computations or offline rendering. Even for those things, programmable GPUs are usually better option now anyway.


Originally Posted by ghst: View Post
you know why you'd only be getting less than half the 3.8 tflops you'd expect from a 7970?
Because that's not what was written in the first place. It doesn't say that it's 7970 in there.
Last edited by Lord Error; 06-08-2012 at 12:13 AM.
Man
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)

Man's Avatar
#118

Originally Posted by Zophar: View Post
I thought we were complaining that this generation's consoles hit their limits prematurely and haven't been powerful enough to keep up relative to past cycles?
I have never been as impressed with end-generation content like I am with Last of Us and GOW4. We are reaching a certain level of visuals now where it's all purely budget.

PS4/X720 will do Final Fantasy movie like graphics. Not the actual ray-tracing craziness or individual strains of hair per skin-cell but it will achieve the overall visual impact in hand of good developers.
sublimit
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)

sublimit's Avatar
#119

Damn it seems Sony will go out with a bang.BRING IT ON!!!
2+2=5
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)

2+2=5's Avatar
#120

Originally Posted by Jarmel: View Post
Then don't read them.
Infact i haven't red the info on the op.
iamshadowlark
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)

iamshadowlark's Avatar
#121

Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
Would make no sense to take a 7970 or something then basically remove half of its performance.
Thats typically what console gpu's are anyway. They do it for the architecture.
fluffydelusions
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:12 AM)

fluffydelusions's Avatar
#122

Originally Posted by civilstrife: View Post
599 US clams
More than that. Well I guess it depends when it releases really (if rumors are true)
JB1981
I am full of shit.
Rich, smooth, creamy shit.
(06-08-2012, 12:12 AM)
#123

come man, who is the source?
BrokenEchelon
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:13 AM)

BrokenEchelon's Avatar
#124

I hope these specs are true.
USC-fan
aka Kbsmoker
(06-08-2012, 12:14 AM)
#125

Originally Posted by Notrollious: View Post
Well, yeah. The HD 6000 series was far more efficient than Nvidia's counterparts... Which is what I'm going to guess will be in the next generation of consoles.

As for AMD CPU's: LOL.
Why are you "LOL"?

The amd apu's kick Intels ass in gfx performance.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:14 AM)
#126

Originally Posted by JB1981: View Post
come man, who is the source?
Rumor with these specs has been fairly persistent the last month or two, and source are developers who want to remain anonymous. Unless everyone's lying about everything (this and new Xbox specs) it seems fairly believable.
Notrollious
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:17 AM)

Notrollious's Avatar
#127

Originally Posted by USC-fan: View Post
Why are you "LOL"?

The amd apu's kick Intels ass in gfx performance.
Graphics performance, yes, but for everything else, AMD are incredibly behind Intel in terms of pretty much everything else.
Projectjustice
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:18 AM)

Projectjustice's Avatar
#128

$699.99, Sony is going for broke!
Last edited by Projectjustice; 06-08-2012 at 12:20 AM.
jett
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:19 AM)

jett's Avatar
#129

7970 seems crazy...or does it? PS3's RSX was based on the Nvidia 7800(with some features at a lower spec), which 18 months before the PS3 launch was top of the line, unless I'm mistaken. So if the PS4 ends up launching in late 2013 it's virtually the same situation.
specialguy
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)
#130

Originally Posted by v1oz: View Post
No the real issue here is abandoning CELL. When for years we were being told CELL was the future of all things. And that CELL would be in everything from televisions to toasters.
Most likely no Cell in PS4 is a done deal and has been so for a long time. It's a pretty dead chip.

Plus you can be sure next time Sony doesnt want to be difficult to program for again.

Only message board noobs think there's any chance of Cell in PS4.
TEH-CJ
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)

TEH-CJ's Avatar
#131

holy shit 7970hd LOL

this thing will pump out some crazy visuals
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)
#132

Originally Posted by jett: View Post
7970 seems crazy...or does it?
It's not 7970, that was a misleading quote. If you read it a bit more carefully you'll see what he meant.
bgassassin
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:21 AM)

bgassassin's Avatar
#133

Everything is correct. They just used the wrong name for the GPU. It's comparable to an underclocked Pitcairn.
iamshadowlark
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:21 AM)

iamshadowlark's Avatar
#134

Originally Posted by Projectjustice: View Post
$799.99, Sony is going for broke!
Nothing about this rumor really suggests much more than $400 worth of tech.

I just wish this site would leak this supposed document it has.
Durante
I'm taking it FROM here
(06-08-2012, 12:21 AM)

Durante's Avatar
#135

Originally Posted by jett: View Post
7970 seems crazy...or does it? PS3's RSX was based on the Nvidia 7800(with some features at a lower spec), which 18 months before the PS3 launch was top of the line, unless I'm mistaken. So if the PS4 ends up launching in late 2013 it's virtually the same situation.
That's actually true. Something to consider at least. However, back then die shrinks were still more reliable, and high-end GPUs used less power. It's more likely that this is really just a 1.8 TFlop GPU, so ~ 1/2 of a 7970.
TEH-CJ
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)

TEH-CJ's Avatar
#136

Originally Posted by Notrollious: View Post
Graphics performance, yes, but for everything else, AMD are incredibly behind Intel in terms of pretty much everything else.
Thats all that matters. this is a gaming console after all.
1-D_FTW
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)

1-D_FTW's Avatar
#137

Originally Posted by ghst: View Post
a 7970 bolted on to a 3.2 ghz quad core as part of an apu?

you know why you'd only be getting less than half the 3.8 tflops you'd expect from a 7970? because it would be on fire.

the source also states that ps4 was going to be a announced at e3 until the gpu threw a last minute spanner in the works (which was the only reason for the underwhelming conference, duhhhh).

sonyfriend fanfiction. good for a quick tug but don't propose to it or anything.
Thanks for the laughs.
clutch.as.it.gets.
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)

clutch.as.it.gets.'s Avatar
#138

Increase the RAM to 4 GB and you will have a good machine, Sony.
Last edited by clutch.as.it.gets.; 06-08-2012 at 04:36 PM.
bgassassin
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)

bgassassin's Avatar
#139

Originally Posted by iamshadowlark: View Post
Nothing about this rumor really suggests much more than $400 worth of tech.
I agree. I think Sony is on track for a powerful console that won't break the bank this coming gen.
Diddy Kong
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)

Diddy Kong's Avatar
#140

Originally Posted by funkystudent: View Post
or $199 and $20 a month for the rest of your life
Fixed.
jett
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)

jett's Avatar
#141

Originally Posted by Lord Error: View Post
It's not 7970, that was a misleading quote. If you read it a bit more carefully you'll see what he meant.
I see now. Well, even less crazy then.
gaming_noob
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)

gaming_noob's Avatar
#142

Originally Posted by Diddy Kong: View Post
Fixed.
Sooo tired of your trolling.
Dreams-Visions
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)

Dreams-Visions's Avatar
#143

Originally Posted by Lagspike_exe: View Post
7970 would be absolutely amazing. That's top of the line today.
which is why it ain't happening.

the power draw and cooling alone that would be needed...
specialguy
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)
#144

Originally Posted by bgassassin: View Post
Everything is correct. They just used the wrong name for the GPU. It's comparable to an underclocked Pitcairn.
So if PS4 had a 1.8 TF GPU but 2GB RAM, presumably GDDR5. Durango as rumored had a 1-1.5 TF GPU and 8GB RAM, albeit slower DDR3, that would be well, pretty interesting how it would turn out in practice and which would have better looking games.

I'm guessing third parties wouldn't love the massive RAM disparity there for porting.
onQ123
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)

onQ123's Avatar
#145

Originally Posted by bgassassin: View Post
Everything is correct. They just used the wrong name for the GPU. It's comparable to an underclocked Pitcairn.
even the code-name Liverpool & 16GB of flash?
Arnie
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)

Arnie's Avatar
#146

I'll buy 3.
gamergirly
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:25 AM)

gamergirly's Avatar
#147

Sounds like $599.95 to me. Man, I hope they make something affordable, between them or MS. We thinking about only 2 consoles this gen......
Projectjustice
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:25 AM)

Projectjustice's Avatar
#148

Originally Posted by iamshadowlark: View Post
Nothing about this rumor really suggests much more than $400 worth of tech.

I just wish this site would leak this supposed document it has.
Yea cause it wont be a 7970 in it.
Notrollious
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:26 AM)

Notrollious's Avatar
#149

Originally Posted by TEH-CJ: View Post
Thats all that matter. this is a gaming console after all.
So how do you suppose the raw number crunching and mathematics behind enemy AI, physics, lights, etc is going to be done? You could have a Radeon HD 7970 but if you pair it with an Intel Core 2 Duo, your bottle neck is always going to be the processor.

Also that's partially why the Cell processor in the PS3 is so successful, especially when you off load a lot of the number crunching from the GPU to the CPU.
Glorified G
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:26 AM)

Glorified G's Avatar
#150

Originally Posted by specialguy: View Post
So if PS4 had a 1.8 TF GPU but 2GB RAM, presumably GDDR5. Durango as rumored had a 1-1.5 TF GPU and 8GB RAM, albeit slower DDR3, that would be well, pretty interesting how it would turn out in practice and which would have better looking games.

I'm guessing third parties wouldn't love the massive RAM disparity there for porting.
umm what? Where did you hear this?