|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)
|
#101
|
|
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)
|
#102
Can they just shove these parts into a box, and start selling the PS4, and have a manual on how to construct your PS4...
I need next-gen consoles! |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:04 AM)
|
#103
How do you follow football without a sense of humour, man? C'mon. Sheesh.
Ahhh! This is what I was waiting for. Websites with hyphens in their name are rarely good for you. |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:05 AM)
|
#104
Fake spec is fake. |
|
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:05 AM)
|
#105
You'll never walk alone, Sony.
|
|
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:06 AM)
|
#107
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:06 AM)
|
#108
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#109
Last edited by Glorified G; 06-08-2012 at 12:09 AM.
|
|
aka Kbsmoker
(06-08-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#110
Yes the retail system. This could be dev kit hardware. The ps3 dev had sli nvidia cards[6800 ultras] in the early dev kits. tpd of these gpus are over that....
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:08 AM)
|
#111
As for AMD CPU's: LOL. |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:08 AM)
|
#112
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:09 AM)
|
#113
Quote:
I suppose it's possible this rumor has truth too it, and the site just got the name of the gpu wrong, but it is a 1.8 teraflop GPU. Because I had heard the PS4 had a better GPU but less RAM than Durango, and that Durango had a 1-1.5 TF GPU. So all that fits, for whatever tiny bit it's worth, which isn't much. It's all likely too much for a SOC too. Most likely it's just balony.
Last edited by specialguy; 06-08-2012 at 12:17 AM.
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#114
a 7970 bolted on to a 3.2 ghz quad core as part of an apu?
you know why you'd only be getting less than half the 3.8 tflops you'd expect from a 7970? because it would be on fire. the source also states that ps4 was going to be a announced at e3 until the gpu threw a last minute spanner in the works (which was the only reason for the underwhelming conference, duhhhh). sonyfriend fanfiction. good for a quick tug but don't propose to it or anything. |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#115
No the real issue here is abandoning CELL. When for years we were being told CELL was the future of all things. And that CELL would be in everything from televisions to toasters.
|
|
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#117
[QUOTE=antonz;38657413]Indeed. For it to be a tahiti based gpu in that range it would have to be a 7850 likely.
Quote:
Because that's not what was written in the first place. It doesn't say that it's 7970 in there.
Last edited by Lord Error; 06-08-2012 at 12:13 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#118
PS4/X720 will do Final Fantasy movie like graphics. Not the actual ray-tracing craziness or individual strains of hair per skin-cell but it will achieve the overall visual impact in hand of good developers. |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)
|
#119
Damn it seems Sony will go out with a bang.BRING IT ON!!!
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)
|
#120
|
|
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:11 AM)
|
#121
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
#122
|
|
I am full of shit.
Rich, smooth, creamy shit. (06-08-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
#123
come man, who is the source?
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:13 AM)
|
#124
I hope these specs are true.
|
|
aka Kbsmoker
(06-08-2012, 12:14 AM)
|
#125
|
|
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:14 AM)
|
#126
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:17 AM)
|
#127
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:18 AM)
|
#128
$699.99, Sony is going for broke!
Last edited by Projectjustice; 06-08-2012 at 12:20 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#129
7970 seems crazy...or does it? PS3's RSX was based on the Nvidia 7800(with some features at a lower spec), which 18 months before the PS3 launch was top of the line, unless I'm mistaken. So if the PS4 ends up launching in late 2013 it's virtually the same situation.
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)
|
#130
Plus you can be sure next time Sony doesnt want to be difficult to program for again. Only message board noobs think there's any chance of Cell in PS4. |
|
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)
|
#131
holy shit 7970hd LOL
this thing will pump out some crazy visuals |
|
Insane For Sony
(06-08-2012, 12:20 AM)
|
#132
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:21 AM)
|
#133
Everything is correct. They just used the wrong name for the GPU. It's comparable to an underclocked Pitcairn.
|
|
Banned
(06-08-2012, 12:21 AM)
|
#134
|
|
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)
|
#136
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)
|
#137
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)
|
#138
Increase the RAM to 4 GB and you will have a good machine, Sony.
Last edited by clutch.as.it.gets.; 06-08-2012 at 04:36 PM.
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:22 AM)
|
#139
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#140
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#141
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#142
|
|
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#143
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#144
I'm guessing third parties wouldn't love the massive RAM disparity there for porting. |
|
Junior Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#145
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#146
I'll buy 3.
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:25 AM)
|
#147
Sounds like $599.95 to me. Man, I hope they make something affordable, between them or MS. We thinking about only 2 consoles this gen......
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:25 AM)
|
#148
|
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:26 AM)
|
#149
So how do you suppose the raw number crunching and mathematics behind enemy AI, physics, lights, etc is going to be done? You could have a Radeon HD 7970 but if you pair it with an Intel Core 2 Duo, your bottle neck is always going to be the processor.
Also that's partially why the Cell processor in the PS3 is so successful, especially when you off load a lot of the number crunching from the GPU to the CPU. |
|
Member
(06-08-2012, 12:26 AM)
|
#150
|