|
Tomodachi wa Mahou
(06-11-2012, 01:06 AM)
|
#151
The team with HCA in 2-3-2 has won 20 out of 27 times.
People whining about the 2-3-2 format being unfair to the Thunder are crazy. There's a slight advantage to having HCA in a 2-3-2 in comparison to the 2-2-1-1-1. It is really fucking hard to beat a NBA Finals calibur team 3 times in a row. The team with 3 home games in a row has only managed to win all 3 games a grand total of 2 times in 27 years with the format. |
|
so many feels
gotta adjust my hat (06-11-2012, 01:09 AM)
|
#152
Heat being a second round knock out in the West wouldn't be hard to argue. |
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:09 AM)
|
#153
Efficiency literally doesn't matter in discussing this, people would like you to believe it does, but it doesn't. It's like saying Rondo is a better scorer than AI because he scores at a higher efficiency. |
|
Fleer
(06-11-2012, 01:11 AM)
|
#155
sorry i miscounted, Kobe has the exact same amount of playoff game winners as Lebron.
like, at all. |
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:13 AM)
|
#157
Rondo isn't a better scorer than AI because he scores at a higher efficiency. He's not a better scorer than Kobe, T-Mac, or Deron simply because his FG% is higher |
|
important Canuck facts
(06-11-2012, 01:15 AM)
|
#158
|
|
Fleer
(06-11-2012, 01:15 AM)
|
#159
If Rondo hit as many game winners as Kobe on half the shots i'd call him more clutch too. Who's talking about who the better scorer is? |
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:17 AM)
|
#163
Jesus are we going around in circles? Yes, hitting 25 game winners is more impressive than hitting 5 even if you do it less efficiently. Just like scoring 30 is more impressive than scoring 15 even if you do it less efficiently. Unless you want to tell me that a guy who's 2-4 in the last 24 seconds of a close game in the last 3 years is a better late game clutch option than Kobe/Bron/Wade/Dirk/Deron/CP3 simply because their FG% is lower? What you're also forgetting btw is that the Lakers routinely have a top 3 record in the league in points decided by 3 or less or overtime games. This year their record was the best. Missing shots doesn't mean shit if you still find a way to win the game.
Last edited by Vahagn; 06-11-2012 at 01:19 AM.
|
|
Fleer
(06-11-2012, 01:19 AM)
|
#165
and yes if you score 30 points on 25% shooting it sure as hell is less impressive than 15 on 50% |
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:21 AM)
|
#167
Kobe has way more total game winners, and actual good Finals games. So stop picking an arbitrary thing and then going with it. Also, you're full of shit, Lebron hasn't hit a playoff game winner in his time with the Heat. He has less than 5 playoff game winners in his entire Cavs career, so wtf are you talking about.
Nobody in the NBA scores 30 at that type of rate. Lebron and Kobe's late game numbers don't have a 25% disparity. If you're going to make arguments, make genuine ones.
Last edited by Vahagn; 06-11-2012 at 01:23 AM.
|
|
totally led his debate team
(06-11-2012, 01:23 AM)
|
#169
Being clutch continues to be the most overated thing in basketball history. If your teams have to rely so much on someone being clutch then you won't win a lot of chips. Look at the Bulls.
Originally Posted by MorisUkunRasik:
Nobody is bragging about making it out of the east. You are saying that even with Bosh and Wade LBJ still can't get a ring, while he's still in a great spot to win one. In the same breath you are claiming Heat would get knocked out in the second round in the WCF when you and everyone else in this thread constantly argues me down about how the Heat are the overwhelming favorites. Something something dissonance.. |
|
Fleer
(06-11-2012, 01:24 AM)
|
#171
Kobe has 4 playoff game winners. |
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:26 AM)
|
#173
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:32 AM)
|
#176
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U616sib8v-Y I never defined it as just game winners. But even so, this video shows 5 game winners in the playoffs and that's before 2009. A Total of 30 game winners in his career up to 2010. Those aren't counting tying shots to send it to overtime. So, check your facts.
Last edited by Vahagn; 06-11-2012 at 01:35 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:34 AM)
|
#180
Yeah. Also almost all the betting lines I've seen have the Thunder at -150 and I haven't seen a single line with the heat as favorites. Must be weird coming into a series as an underdog by all accounts, but at the same time being expected to win it all or be deemed a total failure. I don't think I've ever seen anything similar.
Last edited by FindMyFarms; 06-11-2012 at 01:36 AM.
|
|
testicles on a cold fall morning
(06-11-2012, 01:35 AM)
|
#181
is clutchness the 'new' truthiness? something you feel in your gut? do people with 1 basketball experience understand the 'clutch gene' less than someone with 3 basketball experience? how about 20? does it curve logarithmically? thanks for reinforcing my view that those using any permutation of the 'clutch gene' when discussing sports is a simple-minded dolt. again, see: Bayless. |
|
Fleer
(06-11-2012, 01:35 AM)
|
#182
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:37 AM)
|
#187
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:41 AM)
|
#190
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:43 AM)
|
#192
2000 Suns
2000 Pacers 2002 SA 2006 Suns 2008 SA You're seriously looking at some wrong stats. Even so, yes he is. Again, FG% doesn't matter. You don't argue that a 5 time scoring champion isn't a great scorer because his FG% isn't stellar. And you don't argue that a guy with 30+ game winners in his career and countless other game tying shots isn't clutch because of his FG% It's silly. I guess If I get a better rate of return on my stock portfolio i'll be a better investor than Warren Buffet based on your logic. Splitting hairs over %'s instead of actual accomplishments.
Last edited by Vahagn; 06-11-2012 at 01:46 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-11-2012, 01:46 AM)
|
#193
Also someone be a hero and find out the song being played in >>stupid heat dancing celebration thing<< It's too catchy....
|
|
if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
(06-11-2012, 01:49 AM)
|
#197
|