|
Member
(06-14-2012, 05:08 AM)
|
#101
No third party gives a shit about this. |
|
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 06:29 AM)
|
#102
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 06:44 AM)
|
#105
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 06:48 AM)
|
#106
|
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(06-14-2012, 06:59 AM)
|
#107
I wonder how long it will be until there is a Vita Monster Hunter game to get people playing....
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:30 AM)
|
#112
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:33 AM)
|
#113
What's gonna save Vita? 3DS ports? Not gonna happen, not worth the effort. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:36 AM)
|
#114
WTF? It's easy to say that in hindsight but if Sony expected the Vita to not be profitable, they wouldn't have made it in the first place. The thing isn't even a year old so it's pretty silly to be calling out doom and gloom at this point. But hey, that's Gaf for you.
|
|
(06-14-2012, 07:36 AM)
|
#115
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:39 AM)
|
#116
I'm saying that, if Sony were to change their view of the Vita from its own dedicated console to some sort of PS3 peripheral, that would mean the program would represent a massive loss for them. Not that the Vita is necessarily dead. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:40 AM)
|
#117
Basically, the survival of the Vita depends on it. Ofcourse, with the 3DS sales Nintendo could play hard and reduce royalty fees for 3DS exclusive titels to prevent multiplatform handheld releases. |
|
Cranky. Very cranky.
Rather sarcastic to boot. (06-14-2012, 07:43 AM)
|
#118
in a weird twist, i think it's in nintendo's best interest that sony's handheld finds some degree of success. this isn't like 5 years ago where they'd be able to just go on autopilot like they did with the gba if sony dropped out. if sony was forced to drop out, it would indicate a huge wane in interest for dedicated handheld machines, and nintendo's would be next.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:44 AM)
|
#119
Ah, sorry. I see what you're saying. I read your post out of context. >_<
|
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(06-14-2012, 07:49 AM)
|
#122
i think you can argue that the PSP was the "PS2's companion" in similar fashion. It was a companion for current gen hardware up until the point where the PS3 came out and the PSP started to pick up all the left over PS2 games that were being made for it but didnt want to scale up to the PS3. Its sort of like a "catch-all" net for that group of PS2 development, i suppose. I don't know how much of a point it is or how well it actually did in that regard, but its interesting to think about nonetheless. For a while we were seeing Wii -> PSP ports, right? so maybe we'll see Wii U -> PSVita ports as well. Sony is competing with Nintendo but not in the handheld realm -- they're in the "portable home console" market. |
|
Master of the Google Search
(06-14-2012, 07:50 AM)
|
#123
I know a lot of people in both real life and on the internet who are unaware of the VITA's japanese sales and just assume that the system is going to be a bastion for japanese games like last generation. But I can't see that happening with how the system is currently doing.
A lot of people also assume that a Monster Hunter game is definitely coming to the VITA, which isnt assured either. I really wonder how this is all going to play out.
Last edited by grandjedi6; 06-14-2012 at 08:03 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 07:54 AM)
|
#124
Yeah, I just don't see how this would be a good move for Capcom. MH3 has sold almost twice as many copies as Vita has sold units in Japan. Why would they choose to put such a low limit on the number of copies they could sell? Even if MH helped to push Vitas, it could never push enough to make up that difference.
|
|
Cranky. Very cranky.
Rather sarcastic to boot. (06-14-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#125
if they do anything with it, it'll be something they had in the works before launch and is only ready to show now. they probably had two tests ready, one for the vita and another for the 3ds.
|
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(06-14-2012, 08:00 AM)
|
#128
Well played. :) |
|
Master of the Google Search
(06-14-2012, 08:08 AM)
|
#130
|
|
Banned
(06-14-2012, 08:17 AM)
|
#131
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 08:34 AM)
|
#132
|
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(06-14-2012, 08:43 AM)
|
#133
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:09 AM)
|
#142
I'm sure they would have at least considered MH4 for the Vita. Why would they pay extra to play an inferior version?
Last edited by BishopLamont; 06-14-2012 at 09:13 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:14 AM)
|
#144
Or, to put it another way: Bumps happen. They're not signs of a trend. ... all that said, this is a *good* bump, and there's similar system-selling software in the next couple of weeks, so I do expect it to be somewhat sustained. I'll be very surprised if it doesn't drop back to sub-10k levels again after this, though. |
|
Master of the Google Search
(06-14-2012, 09:19 AM)
|
#145
Well it did years ago on the PSP. Nowadays I somewhat doubt it. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:21 AM)
|
#146
Why are so many people cheering the for the death of this system? I don't get it.
I mean if you don't want it, cool. And if you like the 3DS and hate all competitors, awesome -- you don't have anything to worry about, even if the Vita makes a massive upswing you'll still be in your coveted first place. And if you love Microsoft... why would you care about a handheld? I just don't get it. So many people on this forum seem to derive JOY out of the idea that the vita might fail. It seems so.... childish. |
|
Master of the Google Search
(06-14-2012, 09:26 AM)
|
#147
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:30 AM)
|
#148
I've got a Vita. I want good games for it, I want healthy competition in the handheld space. That doesn't mean I can't be critical of how it's performed thus far, or sceptical over its long-term potential.
|