|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:18 PM)
|
#104
Yeah we're really talking about biological 'immortality'. And even if you live for billions of years, eventually the universe will end, so. You're totally fucked anyway you look at it! Ha!
|
|
Boring Member
(06-14-2012, 02:24 PM)
|
#105
Unless some genius scientist finds a way to stop cells from aging, it wont happen.
Then, there would be the problem of overpopulation getting impossible to manage unless we send people on the moon or Mars after building ships and bases for those people, which isnt close to happen either. |
|
Boring Member
(06-14-2012, 02:36 PM)
|
#107
People at the age of near 100 already looks very weak and frail. I can't imagine how a 150 years old human would look like. A walking corpse?
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:36 PM)
|
#108
Do you see nothing wrong with a caste of undying rich people? Social promotion is bad enough as is. If something like this happened it should come with a histerectomy / tying of the tubes. Our population is bad enough without the people that consume the most in the world living forever and producing even more offspring.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:37 PM)
|
#109
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:37 PM)
|
#110
The biggest issue will be the cost of life extension. People will pour their life savings into extending their lives and we're gonna have to figure out what to do about the retirement age. I guess if you end up living 300 years you can work for 250+ but since not everyone will be able to afford life extension technologies it will be different for everyone. Kind of creepy, actually.. the idea of some people being able to afford hundreds of years. And others being doomed to the grave at an inferior age.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:38 PM)
|
#112
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:38 PM)
|
#113
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:38 PM)
|
#114
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:42 PM)
|
#116
I even read that age rejuvenation therapies will be able to bring a 90 year-old back from the brink and give them the appearance and vigor of a 20-30 year-old. If you can repair all the cell damage, why not?
Last edited by DarkKyo; 06-14-2012 at 02:44 PM.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:43 PM)
|
#117
Visions of the Future is the name of the documentary. The episode is The Biotech Revolution. I can't find a link to the actual program but here is the BBC page and Wiki page.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0088yjf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visions_of_the_Future The episode is really good and essentially answers this question in full and in incredible detail. It may only be the guess work (albeit educated) of one Dr but it is really interesting, I'm sure it can be found on YouTube or something. |
|
Boring Member
(06-14-2012, 02:46 PM)
|
#118
I really doubt about this one, even more than stopping cells from aging. You can't make a 90 years old look like a 20 years old one.
Last edited by Bisnic; 06-14-2012 at 02:50 PM.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:48 PM)
|
#119
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_nutricula |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:50 PM)
|
#120
I know it sounds hard to believe, but I think it's been done to some extent in mice. If you can actually repair the 70+ years of damage, I really don't see why the old body would stay looking old.
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(06-14-2012, 02:50 PM)
|
#121
"Oh yeah, I've spent about 800 years of my life with a quasi-spatial AI running my thought-patterns but I still talk and act like a 30 year old person." Yeah, okay Hamilton, whatever. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:51 PM)
|
#122
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 02:53 PM)
|
#123
Just a thought. If you could theoretically live for say 20 thousand years then there isn't much stopping us from sending people to the planets that are lightyears away because the 1000 years of their life that it would take to get there (give or take) would be nothing to them.
|
|
Fafracer forever
(06-14-2012, 02:53 PM)
|
#124
Originally Posted by Zaptruder:
But think of it from organ replacement perspective. If you connect artificial neurons to your brain (assuming they seamlessly emulate natural ones), brain won't mind, and you've just expanded your mental capacity. Add enough - and it becomes difficult to tell which part of brain contains the personality.
Last edited by Fafalada; 06-14-2012 at 02:58 PM.
|
|
(06-14-2012, 03:00 PM)
|
#125
Immortality should come at the cost of sterilization.
The money cost shouldn't be too concerning.. you will have plenty of time to pay it off. New slavery begins! |
|
<3Tingle Loves Me<3
(06-14-2012, 03:03 PM)
|
#126
Once I turn 30 I'm going to begin a CRON regimen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRON-diet |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 03:11 PM)
|
#128
I can only see that possible before someone's born (where you can manipulate their gene right away). |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 03:26 PM)
|
#131
Mental stability would be a bigger issue.
It's been a while but as I recall, if you could make the body cell continue to regenerate at youth like levels, the brain would eventually get old, unstable and practically useless due to it's non regenerative properties. And if it could regenerate, it would have to do so with the ability to pass it's information without disrupting anything else. The complexities of the brain would likely be the biggest hurdle to overcome and progress would be slow as it'd take centuries of data to analyze effects. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 03:35 PM)
|
#132
If biological rejuvenation or immortality is ever obtained, it will be too late for everyone posting in this thread. There is a big difference in biology and complexity of a jellyfish and a human. Also, most genetic chimeras are created at the gamete stage. Not as adults.
In the distant future, it would be genetically engineered newborns with these properties. Not your old asses. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 03:40 PM)
|
#133
Population Control.
First, lets become a multi-planetary society in some way. Or be able to build ocean cities without disrupting their eco-systems. Then figure out a way to create artificial food and have it be sustainable for everyone. Clean energy is a must too. Then we can begin distributing immortality. All I know is I want it so bad. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 04:00 PM)
|
#135
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(06-14-2012, 04:08 PM)
|
#139
|
|
car flags....
car flags everywhere (06-14-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#141
|
|
point your penis at me,
and have a good day (06-14-2012, 04:24 PM)
|
#146
No, your backlog would simply extend infinitely.
Immortality would give us a terrible quality of life. Motivation would go down the drain. There would be no impetus to get things done because there would be an infinite amount of time do them. The economy would turn to shit as people would no longer be retiring and the workforce would be too huge to be accommodated. Overpopulation would lead to scarce resources and whole populations would starve en masse. But as the population is immortal, we would be trapped in a universe of eternal suffering. Other species would die out and the world would become a polluted cess pool where "nature" is a word spoken only in fairy tales. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 04:25 PM)
|
#147
Defiantly will be possible in my lifetime, unless i get ran over by a bus tomorrow lol. Scientists have already recognised several different possible causes of ageing such as free radicals and telomeric factors, its just a case of solving these problems.
The last I heard, they had managed to find proteins which are something like 30% the required efficiency to activate the bodies telomerase gene, to prevent telomere shortening. A company called Sierra Sciences does it. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 04:27 PM)
|
#148
Hopefully, knowing that you'll live to see the consequences of your actions will encourage people to treat the planet and the people around us better. With our current short lifespans, it's easy for people to go for the short term gains when you know that any potential fallout is far away, and will probably be somebody else's problem.
|
|
point your penis at me,
and have a good day (06-14-2012, 04:27 PM)
|
#149
Might be worth keeping in mind there is already a human condition involving immortality.
It is called "cancer." |