|
(06-25-2012, 09:50 AM)
|
#151
That was great. Surprisingly, such an un-HBO show. I also loved Sorkin off the leash of network TV. Hearing Sam Waterson swear in such amazing dialogues was great.
It said something, anything, derogatory towards conservatives no matter the context. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 10:05 AM)
|
#152
It feels like a show that should be airing on one of the networks, only people can actually talk like real adults. Well, okay, real adults but smarter. Great start. Thankful there's something good on HBO Sundays now that GoT and Girls are over for the season. It's also much more my style than Luck was.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 10:06 AM)
|
#153
It said something negative about conservatives with the added benefit of retrospect. It's completely transparent.
|
|
(06-25-2012, 11:12 AM)
|
#154
Shocking. Next you're going to tell me that the people at Fox News don't actually believe the crap they say. |
|
demodded, not denutted
(06-25-2012, 11:16 AM)
|
#155
What a fucking embarrassingly self-indulgent show. When Emily Mortimer's character started going on about how soon the nation would have a conversation about whether government was good for anything and that they had a shot at centering the debate, I nearly vomited in my mouth.
Definitely will not be watching another episode. |
|
will totally Facebook friend you! *giggle* *LOL*
(06-25-2012, 11:39 AM)
|
#156
That's the thing though, wasn't the whole first scene supposed to be shocking? Wasn't the rest of the episode supposed to come off as bold? Felt like the show said it did a lot of things without actually acting like it, which was a major problem on Studio 60 too.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 11:48 AM)
|
#157
It's amazing to me that as soon as you introduce politics how it polarizes everyone. Nobody is willing to listen to an opposing viewpoint without waving their flag about -- and yammering to anyone willing to listen -- what their beliefs are. It's that showing of fanaticism that makes 90% of people hard-headed and stubborn, no matter which side of the aisle you're on.
As for the witty dialogue, I don't understand how you can't enjoy it. I don't want characters to be filling the air with "uhm" and "like" in every sentence no more than I want an action hero to want to talk over his differences with his enemy rather than hitting him with a rocket launcher. Dialogue and conversation are amazing tools in any story, why would someone want the bar set low for something like that? Also, this is a performance. It's meant for entertainment. Whether it entertains you or not is your opinion. But don't ask for fairness or complain about agendas. Save the political regurgitation for call-in talk shows because it means jack shit when it comes to art and literature. Social commentary has been in the arts for a very long time. To ask for it to be removed on account of balance and fairness is simply sad. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(06-25-2012, 12:36 PM)
|
#161
|
|
good credit (by proxy)
(06-25-2012, 12:36 PM)
|
#162
It was alright. At first I hated it's dialogue and vibe and the world everything existed in, but by the end it had enough good qualities for me to overlook that. I think my 2nd wife liked it more than my 3rd. I could imagine it being one of those serious faux-biopic dramas with comedic little sprinkles thrown in all over the place in a way that's supposed to appear idiosyncratic, but then maybe at the end of Season 2 they surprise reveal magic sorcery, and illuminati plots, and ancient beings and spells. Somehow I doubt anything like that will happen because people that have a fuckload of money (tv producers) just aren't that much fun. I'm high what did I just type?
|
|
Banned
(06-25-2012, 12:41 PM)
|
#163
|
|
good credit (by proxy)
(06-25-2012, 12:51 PM)
|
#165
I don't know who Sorkin is, I didn't read the OP. I never read the OP's in threads about a movie, or show, or album. I guess he made the West Wing (never seen) and The Social Network? It's no Jaws and E.T. and Amistad and Schindler's List, but good credentials.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 12:56 PM)
|
#166
|
|
MagsMoonshine
(06-25-2012, 01:45 PM)
|
#174
That was an excellent pilot. Did its job and had my attention throughout.
Reading some impressions, it's a good thing that I don't follow politics much. What I liked the most about this show was the energy during the breaking news buildup and the behind the scenes aspect of how they run their news show.
Last edited by AwesomeSauce; 06-25-2012 at 01:51 PM.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 03:04 PM)
|
#176
Quote:
Quote:
I'm just messing with you. Everybody knows that baby boomers are the worst generation ever. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 03:06 PM)
|
#177
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#179
Been thinking about it this morning and I can't wait to watch this again.
What stood out: 1. Unregulated, profanity-laden Sorkin dialogue is a goddamned joy to witness. While I can understand the monologues getting a bit indulgent for some, you have to love the little character moments and rapid-fire exchanges when there's no degree of PC to consider. Loved when Sam Waterston jumped down the throat of the younger producer guy, Don. It's sad to me that this show had to be on HBO after the impassioned explanation of why it's better to be on network TV found in Studio 60; but I'm glad to see he's taking full advantage of it. 2. The token, main "tough love best friendship" being between Jeff Daniels and Sam Waterston is a fucking gold mine. 3. Alison Pill has some serious chops. I hope her character is as prominent as I feel the pilot points to. Didn't expect her to stand out so much (only know her from Scott Pilgrim). Sorkin's always been very solid at scripting natural chemistry, too "Bam - cupid!" ;) ![]() ![]() 4. I thought Olivia Munn was supposed to be in this. Can't say I minded that she didn't show up :-/ I really dug the little "what did everyone else cover?" beat during the denouement. Jeff Daniels looks like he's gonna have a lot of fun with this.
As to the rest, it seemed clear to me that his staff wasn't surprised by his attitude in that he had always been kind of an asshole to them, despite his public persona being the likable Leno-archetype. You didn't get to see a single softball-interview that his "old" style supposedly relied on. As to them being cool with it, all but 5 or so staff members were totally jumping ship...
Quote:
1) The rant did not happen on his show, it was a public forum 2) As a hard-news anchor he isn't expected to comment on his personal life during broadcasts 3) There was legitimate breaking news to cover for the length of the show About the "vacuum": If it's anything like the West Wing, the show exists in an alternate timeline where events from real life still transpire but the chronology is skewed, and fictional events take place as well that can be stand-ins for real news stories but transpire differently. The rules and conventions of the world will become clearer over time (i.e. the Election Cycle schedule in the West Wing universe). Man, I really hope this finds an audience. Even if this thread is filled with complaints from beginning to end, just having something this legitimately high-caliber on TV again to talk about is worthwhile. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:16 PM)
|
#181
I mostly liked it, agreed with others about the cheesiness and self-indulgence of some of the speeches though. Especially the "rousing part" of McAvoy's speech in the beginning, where he's waxing poetically about how great America used to be...just seemed like a weirdly naive and childish view of things.
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(06-25-2012, 04:29 PM)
|
#183
I did like Sam Watterson's "I'm a Marine and I'll beat the shit out of you!!" outburst.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:30 PM)
|
#185
Quote:
|
|
bow down to the
Kings in Raider hats (06-25-2012, 04:31 PM)
|
#186
I liked it, but then I'm a fan of Sorkin and the stuff that turn some people off about him (Loved Studio 60 and SportsNite). The best part by far was when they were in a rush trying got break the oil spill story. That whole process was really interesting and entertaining.
Quote:
Last edited by Ninja Scooter; 06-25-2012 at 04:33 PM.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:41 PM)
|
#187
I watched the opening monologue again last night on the rerun they Played right after the premiere.
That speech is award nominaton worthy for Jeff Daniels and aaron Sorkin. When the show gets going, whenever they are about to break the story about the oil spill. That's the best part of it. That was so interesting. That argument that happens 90 seconds before daniels goes live, with the whole "vertigo medician" screen is hilarious. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:51 PM)
|
#188
First 30 minutes were godawful, after that it got better. Still felt a bit weird, the dialogue sounded surprisingly little like Sorkin, the timing especially of Jeff Daniels was weirdly off, and it reminded me too much of Studio 60. I'll give it a few more episodes though.
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(06-25-2012, 04:55 PM)
|
#189
You know, she speaks really fast, that might be good for Sorking dailogue. And it depends how her character is cast. I think Sorkin's writing can make bad actors look good.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:55 PM)
|
#190
You missed my point entirely. Having a passionate opinion isn't a huge problem, but Sorkin continually finds a way to make it one.
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 04:57 PM)
|
#191
That scene is STRAIGHT Dana/Casey gold from Sports Night, check it out if you haven't seen it. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 05:11 PM)
|
#192
I really liked the show. I was a little put off by Mac's plea to keep her and her staff on because it didn't feel like the way someone would talk in real life... if that makes any sense. Really liked the character dynamics and pace of the show. I have a feeling that the high that they achieved in the first episode (Will hitting on all cylinders) will regress over the next couple of episodes causing lots of tension and threats of end-of-week firings.
Also, I don't know if it was because the SP's name was Jim, but I couldn't shake the "Jim & Pam" feeling from Jim and Maggie. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 05:35 PM)
|
#194
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 05:57 PM)
|
#195
I was getting that vibe even from the previews for the show. When they said his name was Jim Harper (vs. The Office's Jim Halpert), I almost couldn't believe it. I mean, it's really close, and he kinda looks like Krasinski. It can't merely be coincidental, right?
|
|
Subete no aware
(06-25-2012, 05:59 PM)
|
#196
I'm almost hoping they get to an episode where they somehow predict the assassination of bin Laden days before it happens. |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 06:02 PM)
|
#198
Videos from HBO's youtube channel:
- Full Pilot at 720p - Inside the Pilot (Sorkin discusses the premiere) - Episode #2 preview (please spoiler tag any discussion) |
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 06:13 PM)
|
#199
|
|
Member
(06-25-2012, 06:27 PM)
|
#200
|