RobotsAnger
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:24 PM)

RobotsAnger's Avatar
#651

What's the average bandwidth cap in the US? I don't see many people complaining about it in this topic so I assume it's pretty high. My cap here in Canada is 90GB and this would destroy my bandwidth.
quetz67
victim of conscious
thought shortage;
all systems sold out
(07-02-2012, 06:27 PM)
#652

Originally Posted by DR3AM: View Post
if implemented the way gamers see it ( BC on PS4, PS1,2 games on Vita) this could be huge for sony.
But why stop there, this a technology to play the best looking games without the hardware. Vita can emulate PS1 games easily and probably PS2 games.
makingmusic476
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:27 PM)

makingmusic476's Avatar
#653

Originally Posted by RobotsAnger: View Post
What's the average bandwidth cap in the US? I don't see many people complaining about it in this topic so I assume it's pretty high. My cap here in Canada is 90GB and this would destroy my bandwidth.
Caps aren't all that common in the U.S., with only a few ISPs starting to do that recently. I think A&T has a 250gb cap for its fiber service.
ZombieSupaStar
beaten too hard
or not enough <3
(07-02-2012, 06:30 PM)

ZombieSupaStar's Avatar
#654

Originally Posted by RobotsAnger: View Post
What's the average bandwidth cap in the US? I don't see many people complaining about it in this topic so I assume it's pretty high. My cap here in Canada is 90GB and this would destroy my bandwidth.
250 here
patsu
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:32 PM)
#655

Well, the cable operators can also up or remove the cap if you subscribe to their channels also, beyond just Internet connectivity. ^_^

I think they did this for their own VoD services.

EDIT: The other key benefit of this deal is Sony gain a team of savvy online services folks, both technical and business.
Last edited by patsu; 07-02-2012 at 06:38 PM.
-Pyromaniac-
(07-02-2012, 06:35 PM)

-Pyromaniac-'s Avatar
#656

Originally Posted by RobotsAnger: View Post
What's the average bandwidth cap in the US? I don't see many people complaining about it in this topic so I assume it's pretty high. My cap here in Canada is 90GB and this would destroy my bandwidth.
dude you need to leave rogers/bell immediately. Go with one of the wholesalers like Teksavvy. Cheaper, same speeds for the most part, higher cap or unlimited if you want it.

I pay for 300gb since it's more than enough, but there is an unlimited tier.
OldJadedGamer
Banned
(07-02-2012, 06:37 PM)

OldJadedGamer's Avatar
#657

Originally Posted by RobotsAnger: View Post
What's the average bandwidth cap in the US? I don't see many people complaining about it in this topic so I assume it's pretty high. My cap here in Canada is 90GB and this would destroy my bandwidth.
Comcast one of the biggest ISP's is 250GB. AT&T is 150GB.
Last edited by OldJadedGamer; 07-02-2012 at 06:42 PM.
djplaeskool
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:40 PM)

djplaeskool's Avatar
#658

250GB here with Comcast.
Evidently, though, they're about to delve into the world of bandwidth tiered pricing.
RobotsAnger
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:43 PM)

RobotsAnger's Avatar
#659

Originally Posted by -Pyromaniac-: View Post
dude you need to leave rogers/bell immediately. Go with one of the wholesalers like Teksavvy. Cheaper, same speeds for the most part, higher cap or unlimited if you want it.

I pay for 300gb since it's more than enough, but there is an unlimited tier.
I'm kinda locked in. Having Rogers wireless, cable tv, home phone and internet all on plans makes it kinda difficult to make the cut. If I cut my internet, I lose the perk of 35% off. That said, I did try to switch to teksavvy at one point and they told me in wasn't currently offered in my area.
USC-fan
aka Kbsmoker
(07-02-2012, 06:43 PM)
#660

Comcast drop the cap last month.
-Pyromaniac-
(07-02-2012, 06:45 PM)

-Pyromaniac-'s Avatar
#661

This is huge news. I could see PS4 being the last real console for Sony. Lets say it lasts 5-7 years, that's more than enough time for Gaikai to do all the improvements they've talked about doing and all that. Then Sony will just release an Apple TV like box on the cheap that people use to stream games. And have it in all TVs of course.

Originally Posted by RobotsAnger: View Post
I'm kinda locked in. Having Rogers wireless, cable tv, home phone and internet all on plans makes it kinda difficult to make the cut. If I cut my internet, I lose the perk of 35% off. That said, I did try to switch to teksavvy at one point and they told me in wasn't currently offered in my area.
I don't know man, I got rogers cable and phone, but I had to switch to teksavvy, it was well worth it.
OldJadedGamer
Banned
(07-02-2012, 06:50 PM)

OldJadedGamer's Avatar
#662

Originally Posted by USC-fan: View Post
Comcast drop the cap last month.
Just looked this up and they did and they didn't. The limit is now 300 GB but if you go over you are charged exta for it. So not an end all cap, you just pay more now.
yankeehater
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:52 PM)

yankeehater's Avatar
#663

Originally Posted by USC-fan: View Post
Comcast drop the cap last month.
Do you have a link for that?
Nerfgun
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:53 PM)

Nerfgun's Avatar
#664

Originally Posted by patsu: View Post
Ah, need to rephrase. They use _both_ software and hardware decoding based on needs. The hardware decoder on old iPhone is weaker compared to the new ones. Their media stack also does more than what a typical hardware decoders offer.
ah. thanks. that's interesting if they have that codec flexibility without roasting the battery with high CPU.
Majanew
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:53 PM)

Majanew's Avatar
#665

Originally Posted by makingmusic476: View Post
Caps aren't all that common in the U.S., with only a few ISPs starting to do that recently. I think A&T has a 250gb cap for its fiber service.
It is common. AT&T does it even with DSL customers at 150GB/month. Comcast (the biggest provider) 250GB/month, and Time Warner in certain areas.


Originally Posted by USC-fan: View Post
Comcast drop the cap last month.
I heard that. That is was due to being investigated by the government.
bender
Member
(07-02-2012, 06:53 PM)

bender's Avatar
#666

Originally Posted by yankeehater: View Post
Do you have a link for that?
http://blog.comcast.com/2012/05/comc...pproaches.html
Grampa Simpson
(07-02-2012, 06:58 PM)

Grampa Simpson's Avatar
#667

Originally Posted by AgentChris: View Post
Dat PS4 backwards compatibility.
There won't really be a PS4. The powerful rendering systems will be based in colocation facilities and will use Gaikai for streaming. They will sell several boxes with the PS4 name though. The lowest end being simply a roku type box all the way through one that has Google TV type video overlay and cable box capabilities. They'll also offer it as a free downloadable update to the PS3. It will give them an instant 60-70m userbase to tout to the publishers.

Don't forget the PC client, and the built in client in all new Sony TVs (bluetooth + network + compressed video decode is all it takes).

It really is a great strategy, and will be a very good step to creating a market disruption.

Five years down the road they'll have an upgraded version of the Colo box and a firmware update will declare all of the devices to be PS5.
USC-fan
aka Kbsmoker
(07-02-2012, 07:02 PM)
#668

Originally Posted by OldJadedGamer: View Post
Just looked this up and they did and they didn't. The limit is now 300 GB but if you go over you are charged exta for it. So not an end all cap, you just pay more now.
They are testing a new model.
quetz67
victim of conscious
thought shortage;
all systems sold out
(07-02-2012, 07:04 PM)
#669

Originally Posted by Grampa Simpson: View Post
There won't really be a PS4. The powerful rendering systems will be based in colocation facilities and will use Gaikai for streaming. They will sell several boxes with the PS4 name though. The lowest end being simply a roku type box all the way through one that has Google TV type video overlay and cable box capabilities. They'll also offer it as a free downloadable update to the PS3. It will give them an instant 60-70m userbase to tout to the publishers.

Don't forget the PC client, and the built in client in all new Sony TVs (bluetooth + network + compressed video decode is all it takes).

It really is a great strategy, and will be a very good step to creating a market disruption.

Five years down the road they'll have an upgraded version of the Colo box and a firmware update will declare all of the devices to be PS5.
This! ;)
Yoshiya
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:07 PM)

Yoshiya's Avatar
#670

Originally Posted by patsu: View Post
I don't think Gaikai has to be tied to H.264 though. H.265 is the next leap (More efficient and less intensive at the same quality). The Gaikai servers/encoders and many devices like PS3 and iPad can be programmed to use H.265 since there is no dedicated H.264 chip in there to begin with. It's all CPU + GPU work.
Completely incorrect. H.265 will see a ~40% decrease in file size/bandwidth for subjectively equivalent image quality. This is very promising for these types of streaming services, yes, but this comes at the cost of dramatic increase in the complexity of both decoding and encoding the video. Modern SoCs and Intel CPUs come packaged with hardware-implemented H.264 decoders, and it is this fixed-function hardware which takes the load off the general computing resources and, most importantly, the battery. The benefits of H.265 are more or less inaccessible to Gaikai until near-ubiquitous adoption of hardware H.265 decoders, which will be cutting-edge in 2014, and just as importantly the enormous resources required to encode H.265 at 60FPS in realtime can be overcome within the technology and cost limits they operate within. This will likely necessitate fixed-function H.265 encoders, something surely more distant than decoder integration in mainstream SoCs.
FishyJoe
Junior Member
(07-02-2012, 07:08 PM)
#671

Originally Posted by Grampa Simpson: View Post
There won't really be a PS4. The powerful rendering systems will be based in colocation facilities and will use Gaikai for streaming. They will sell several boxes with the PS4 name though. The lowest end being simply a roku type box all the way through one that has Google TV type video overlay and cable box capabilities. They'll also offer it as a free downloadable update to the PS3. It will give them an instant 60-70m userbase to tout to the publishers.

Don't forget the PC client, and the built in client in all new Sony TVs (bluetooth + network + compressed video decode is all it takes).

It really is a great strategy, and will be a very good step to creating a market disruption.

Five years down the road they'll have an upgraded version of the Colo box and a firmware update will declare all of the devices to be PS5.
I'd love to live in this fantasy world where everyone has stable high speed internet access for cheap. I'd also like to end world hunger and cure cancer.
Yoshiya
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:10 PM)

Yoshiya's Avatar
#672

Originally Posted by OldJadedGamer: View Post
Comcast one of the biggest ISP's is 250GB. AT&T is 150GB.
Hilarious. I might be on lowly ADSL2 (10Mbits on a good day), but my Australian internet connection is pretty affordable and gives me 200GB.

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
I'd love to live in this fantasy world where everyone has stable high speed internet access for cheap. I'd also like to end world hunger and cure cancer.
I'll shed a tear for the less technologically fortunate as they are denied the opportunity to blow $500 on a new console. I'd bet that the overlap between traditional console early adapters and those with decent internet connections is pretty large.
Last edited by Yoshiya; 07-02-2012 at 07:12 PM.
Raistlin
Post Count: 9999
(07-02-2012, 07:14 PM)

Raistlin's Avatar
#673

Holy shit ... WUT!?








Originally Posted by MrPink93485: View Post
Certainly seems that way.

One has to wonder how they can afford to buy out a company considering their losses.
They've got tons of cash. Just because they've had quarters in the red doesn't mean they're massively in debt.

What makes this even easier though is the Japanese gov is giving out super low interest loans ... plus the Yen is quite high. Combine the two, and it's easy for a company as big as Sony to be shopping around.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-02-2012, 07:15 PM)

iceatcs's Avatar
#674

Originally Posted by radioheadrule83: View Post
It's $80m more than it cost New England Sports Ventures to buy Liverpool Football Club :P

But it's a good $640m less than Instagram cost facebook

I think it's good value. I think OnLive would now go for the same or higher.
Yes. It's good deal because they want half billion first place.

I think I have read Onlive want $1.2b.
Jburton
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:16 PM)

Jburton's Avatar
#675

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
I'd love to live in this fantasy world where everyone has stable high speed internet access for cheap. I'd also like to end world hunger and cure cancer.

UK based here and get 15 down and 1 up solid connection and no limits, management or FUP of any description and including line rental and phone calls £25.
Alextended
Banned
(07-02-2012, 07:19 PM)

Alextended's Avatar
#676

Originally Posted by Vic: View Post
So, what does it mean for the future of the PlayStation? I ask as I'm not familiar with gaming-streaming services.
Absolutely nothing until they announce they'll use it in some way affecting it.

We could speculate all sorts of things, from playing PC games on your PS3. Or PS4 games on your Vita and PS3. Or PS4 being a software app for every device they want to support with all the hardware on the Sony side alone.

But it doesn't mean any of that will make business sense or happen.
Last edited by Alextended; 07-02-2012 at 07:22 PM.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-02-2012, 07:19 PM)

iceatcs's Avatar
#677

Originally Posted by Jburton: View Post
UK based here and get 15 down and 1 up solid connection and no limits, management or FUP of any description and including line rental and phone calls £25.
Yeah. UK do have really nice deal. Even Virgin offer up to 100MB fibre optic for same price. (12.75 first 6 months)
Hoo-doo
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:22 PM)

Hoo-doo's Avatar
#678

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
I'd love to live in this fantasy world where everyone has stable high speed internet access for cheap.
It's called Scandinavia, son.

i'm not from there, but their internet is insane.
Yoshiya
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:22 PM)

Yoshiya's Avatar
#679

Originally Posted by Alextended: View Post
Nothing unless they announce they'll use it in some changing way for it. We could speculate all sorts of things but it doesn't mean they will happen.
No, Sony spent $380m on Gaikai despite having no intention to integrate the technology they purchased into their roadmap. Good business.
Jburton
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:22 PM)

Jburton's Avatar
#680

Originally Posted by iceatcs: View Post
Yeah. UK do have really nice deal. Even Virgin offer up to 100MB fibre optic for same price. (12.75 first 6 months)
Yeah and once Sky upgrade the exchange here to access the BT fibre network its an extra £10 for up to 80 down and 10 up (at the very best).
quetz67
victim of conscious
thought shortage;
all systems sold out
(07-02-2012, 07:22 PM)
#681

No limit here (germany), as I watch TV over the connection with one HD stream to watch and one to record at the same time.
FishyJoe
Junior Member
(07-02-2012, 07:23 PM)
#682

Originally Posted by Jburton: View Post
UK based here and get 15 down and 1 up solid connection and no limits, management or FUP of any description and including line rental and phone calls £25.
That's great you live in the UK where this is available. All the British have to do is rebuild their empire and the whole world can be like this.
Corto
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:23 PM)

Corto's Avatar
#683

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
I'd love to live in this fantasy world where everyone has stable high speed internet access for cheap. I'd also like to end world hunger and cure cancer.
Not everyone. Just a sizeable enough audience to make the service viable. Sony could even make deals with cable companies to include PS Cloud service in their offerings of set top boxes in exchange of prioritization of its service data on the network. Though that could raise some eye brows and stir some unwanted controversy.
FoxRomeo
Banned
(07-02-2012, 07:23 PM)
#684

Who is Gakai and why the hell should I care?
Alextended
Banned
(07-02-2012, 07:23 PM)

Alextended's Avatar
#685

Originally Posted by Yoshiya: View Post
No, Sony spent $380m on Gaikai despite having no intention to integrate the technology they purchased into their roadmap. Good business.
That's totally what I said. Oh wait, it isn't and you're being silly to put it kindly.

Funny how you didn't tell us what it means for PlayStation either. Could it be because noone can really know beyond speculation that may or may not happen until and if Sony says otherwise exactly as I suggested and yet you attacked me over it? Could it?

Christ, some people...
Quote:
Read the Digital Foundry article, for one
I have, it changes nothing and what I said remains valid despite your reaction.

I've done my own bits of speculation but didn't attempt to present it as anything but speculation. Keep it up though.
Last edited by Alextended; 07-02-2012 at 08:02 PM.
Jburton
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:24 PM)

Jburton's Avatar
#686

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
That's great you live in the UK where this is available. All the British have to do is rebuild their empire and the whole world can be like this.
Settle down FishyJoe ....... what technological backwater do you hail from then?
Raistlin
Post Count: 9999
(07-02-2012, 07:25 PM)

Raistlin's Avatar
#687

Originally Posted by Oni Jazar: View Post
The Eurogamer article was very informative, keeps the expectations in check and falls in line with the rumors we heard in the past.. Basically says not to expect any PS3 cloud games any time soon.
I somewhat disagree with the h.264 points (and therefore no new HW needed) long term.

I think for this to be successful(as in post-console world successful), they're going to need better compression due to how long it's taking to get the infrastructure out there.

h.265
Last edited by Raistlin; 07-02-2012 at 07:27 PM.
KittyKittyBangBang
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:26 PM)

KittyKittyBangBang's Avatar
#688

So now Microsoft buys OnLive for a cool billion...right?
FishyJoe
Junior Member
(07-02-2012, 07:26 PM)
#689

Originally Posted by Jburton: View Post
Settle down FishyJoe ....... what technological backwater do you hail from then?
Silicon Valley
Yoshiya
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:27 PM)

Yoshiya's Avatar
#690

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
That's great you live in the UK where this is available. All the British have to do is rebuild their empire and the whole world can be like this.
That's not how population density works.
Jburton
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:27 PM)

Jburton's Avatar
#691

Originally Posted by FishyJoe: View Post
Silicon Valley
Say what?

They don't have good network infrastructure in Silicon Valley?
Grampa Simpson
(07-02-2012, 07:30 PM)

Grampa Simpson's Avatar
#692

Originally Posted by Raistlin: View Post
h.265
I really have no idea what the compression roadmap looks like past h.264 - which if I remember correctly is a subspecification or superset or whatever of mpeg-4.
Reallink
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:32 PM)

Reallink's Avatar
#693

Originally Posted by makingmusic476: View Post
Caps aren't all that common in the U.S., with only a few ISPs starting to do that recently. I think A&T has a 250gb cap for its fiber service.
Do huh now? Most of the biggest players in the US have caps. Comcast (the largest provider IIRC) is 250GB, AT&T is 150GB with just internet, 250GB with a bundle of services. Some smaller regional carriers (e.g. Mediacom Cable) also have 250GB caps. Caps are very common in the US and probably cover a majority of subscribers--whether they realize it or not. The providers have done a very good job at minimizing awareness and PR backlash.
Last edited by Reallink; 07-02-2012 at 07:34 PM.
Jburton
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:33 PM)

Jburton's Avatar
#694

Originally Posted by KittyKittyBangBang: View Post
So now Microsoft buys OnLive for a cool billion...right?
Maybe, would be a high price though.

I see this Gaikai purchase as ready made tech for streaming services for Sony music, movies and games.

The delivery system for a new ecosystem (PS store) that will launch with PS4, might also help with new online system (PSN).

It will work along side traditional retail games / download games .... not replace it.


A Games console, Cloud gaming box, Movie / TV / Music streamer, media centre and Blu ray player, browser etc.
Grampa Simpson
(07-02-2012, 07:34 PM)

Grampa Simpson's Avatar
#695

Originally Posted by Jburton: View Post
Say what?

They don't have good network infrastructure in Silicon Valley?
Comcast, Uverse, Sonic.net (love them - DSL2+ shotgunned with no cap), and in some areas Astound. Problem with the Bay Area is that it's really hilly and retrofit is pretty hard. The end result is that everyone but the rich living i the hills can get good internet for fairly cheap.
Yoshiya
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:35 PM)

Yoshiya's Avatar
#696

Originally Posted by Alextended: View Post
Funny how you didn't tell us what it means for PlayStation either. Could it be because noone can really know beyond speculation that may or may not happen until and if Sony says otherwise exactly as I suggested and yet you attacked me over it? Could it?

Christ, some people...
Read the Digital Foundry article, for one.

Beyond that I'd guess this is meant to enable the integration of Playstation content into the wider "Sony Entertainment Network" or whatever it's called. The razor-margin television business is toxic for them; they either need to leave it or find sufficient premium differentiators to justify the return of Sony's premium margins. SEN integration of high-value gaming content could also significantly boost the fortunes of the newly consolidated phone division, though network limitations make that understandably further off.

These are predictions, of course, but it shouldn't be hard to see that this sort of technology promises to expand the potential consumer base for Sony's game content beyond console owners. ROI for next-gen will be more problematic than the bloodbath that was this one if better business models are not implemented - this is panic-mode Sony making a bold attempt at that. They're not spending $400m to stream demos and PS2 games to their next console, I promise you that.
AranhaHunter
Member
(07-02-2012, 07:51 PM)
#697

Originally Posted by Jburton: View Post
I see this Gaikai purchase as ready made tech for streaming services for Sony music, movies and games.
Sony already has the streaming infrastructure for music, IIRC Sony has over 1 million active users on its Music Unlimited service and seems to be catching up to spotify. It now has the infrastructure for Gaming, but it remains to be seen the infrastructure Sony will use for Video streaming.
Ether_Snake
安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
(07-02-2012, 07:53 PM)

Ether_Snake's Avatar
#698

I was so right back in 2008!:)

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthre...hlight=console
Heavy
jerking off to field goals
(07-02-2012, 07:55 PM)

Heavy's Avatar
#699

OnLive and Steve Perlman must be reeling right about now.
Kasumi1970
my name is Ted
(07-02-2012, 07:56 PM)
#700

Originally Posted by maquiladora: View Post
You could say the same about the USA.
and EU also