|
NeoGAF's smiling token!
(07-06-2012, 09:24 PM)
|
Ender's Game or Foundation?
#1
As the title says, I want to start both of these series but I am wondering which to start first. Which would you recommend bookGAF?
edit:
Last edited by Plywood; 07-13-2012 at 08:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:29 PM)
|
#9
Uh, what?
Ender's game is - Oh never mind, talking about the entire series here. It kinda depends on how far you want to read. I only have read the first two books of the Ender series and I've read the Foundation trilogy, because those were the ones I saw recommended and I enjoyed all of the books of (Ender's Game the least). I would say it doesn't matter, but it depends on all the books you want to read from the series. Are the Foundation books outside of the original trilogy recommended? |
|
fuck yo restraining order
(07-06-2012, 09:30 PM)
|
#11
|
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:35 PM)
|
#18
|
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:37 PM)
|
#20
ender's game was written by a homophobic bigot, the foundation series was written by one of the smartest generalists to ever walk the earth.
do ender's game first. reading ender's game after the foundation series is like watching armageddon after 2001: a space odyssey. but i'm gonna have to second salvor's forever war rec. it's kingshit gravy.
Last edited by Tesseract; 07-06-2012 at 09:40 PM.
|
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:38 PM)
|
#21
Exactly this. I really enjoyed the first book, and I was initially quite surprised at the shift for the second one. Still, once I got used to the fact that the next book was going to be very different from the first one, I ended up really liking it. If you've read The Dark Tower books by Stephen King, it's kind of like how the first book ends up acting more like setup for the main character for the rest of the series, and while the events there aren't entirely inconsequential, they act more to flesh out the character's future motivation.
|
|
Banned
(07-06-2012, 09:39 PM)
|
#22
Wasn't he briefly in the first book and then the book jumped in time 50 years? I must admit I liked him as a character but as soon as the book glossed over him I stopped reading.
|
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:44 PM)
|
#26
Srsly.
The quality of the foundation series remains the same throughout, so if he likes Asimov's style he'll be able to finish of the entire series. Ender's Game changes pretty radically mid-series, so he might take longer to finish the series. Thus it's a better use of his time to go through the Foundation series as he'll probably finish the entire series in one go or get turned off by the first book. |
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 09:50 PM)
|
#27
Seriously. I'd never suggest anyone read Prelude / Forward before regular old Foundation.
And I guess I need to eventually go out and buy Foundation and Earth since I've never read it, even though I try to read through the rest of the series at least once a year. |
|
got my tag in the OT
(07-06-2012, 09:54 PM)
|
#30
Ender's game is really just a book. Outside of speaker for the dead and Xenocide the rest are the same as the first book
Foundation isn't terribly well written but it has an incredible premise and is really well thought out. I'd say it's what you're in the mood for. In the mood for an action flick? Ender's game. In the mood for a film? Foundation. |
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 10:03 PM)
|
#31
However Asimov apparently realized how dumb psychohistory - a point that Seldon himself eventually brings up in one of the prequels - was and devoted the entire remainder of the series is to a string of ever evolving deus ex machina retcons. The early books attempt to be hard sci-fi; the later books lean more towards 'space fantasy'. |
|
Junior Member
(07-06-2012, 10:20 PM)
|
#33
When it comes to the first book in each series, it's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, since Foundation wasn't written as a single novel. |
|
Member
(07-06-2012, 10:29 PM)
|
#35
|
|
NeoGAF's smiling token!
(07-13-2012, 07:48 PM)
|
#36
Well, I went through with Ender's Game, I could've finished it sooner but I took my time with it. I felt like it ran through some plot points at the end there, but whatever. Now I'm wondering if I should check out Speaker of the Dead or if I should move onto Foundation or one of the other two recommendations(The Forever War & The Mote in God's Eye.)
|
|
Purple Drazi
(07-13-2012, 07:50 PM)
|
#37
|
|
card-carrying scientician
(07-13-2012, 07:50 PM)
|
#38
Man, I love Ender's Game so much but hands down I'd say Foundation
EDIT: Thread is a bump apparently
Last edited by The Technomancer; 07-13-2012 at 07:52 PM.
|
|
NeoGAF's smiling token!
(07-13-2012, 08:04 PM)
|
#39
Well now you've piqued my interest a bit. |
|
card-carrying scientician
(07-13-2012, 08:06 PM)
|
#40
Orson Scott Card is, at his best, one of the best character driven authors in science fiction, and this is especially true in Speaker for the Dead. Everyone says that the final book, Children of the Mind, is philosophical, but I never really understood that description. I think people use it because that's the book that departs the most from being science fiction and really just plays around with metaphysics and stuff.
|
|
Member
(07-13-2012, 08:10 PM)
|
#42
I wholly enjoyed the Ender series up to Ender's Shadow; each book is good, though it does meander a bit in Children of the Mind. I haven't read anything past Ender's Shadow, and I'm not sure that I will, but I can say that Ender's Game, Speaker of the Dead, and Xenocide I loved. Ender's Game is a really easy book to get into, but the latter books are a different style; still, they aren't hard reads, and I recommend reading them first.
The Foundation series is absolutely amazing. I only say read this second because it blows the Ender series out of the water - no surprise there, really. Read them in order of publication (or, you know, the original trilogy). Also read the Robots series.
Last edited by Grakl; 07-13-2012 at 08:17 PM.
|
|
Junior Member
(07-13-2012, 08:14 PM)
|
#43
Foundation: The original trilogy only, then skip ALL the prequels/sequels and go straight for Psychohistorical Crisis by Donald Kingsbury.
Ender's Game takes a philosphical bent after the original, so if you're fine with that it's a good series. There's a reason why OSC is the only author who got both the Hugo and Nebula back-to-back. If you want stories that are built around a single concept, I would recommend Ringworld and Protector by Larry Niven. Short Stories: Ted Chaing - the fellow blows my mind.
Last edited by Foolworm; 07-13-2012 at 08:16 PM.
|
|
Member
(07-13-2012, 08:15 PM)
|
#44
|
|
Purple Drazi
(07-13-2012, 08:15 PM)
|
#45
I enjoyed the parallel Shadow series a lot, though it falls off a bit midway through. Oh my God, yes. When he's on, he's like a latter-day Borges. Tower of Babylon, Understand, Story of Your Life, and especially Exhalation. Amazing stuff. |
|
Member
(07-13-2012, 08:18 PM)
|
#48
I hated Speaker of the Dead, but loved Ender's Game. Ender went from merciless complex child in the first book to some sort of shrewd pure-as-snow figure in the second. Honestly, I may have liked Speaker of the Dead if it weren't at all related to Ender's Game and had totally different characters or something. What they did to Ender's character was absurd in my humble opinion.
|
|
Member
(07-13-2012, 08:18 PM)
|
#49
I’m reading through the Foundation series now (currently at Foundation’s Edge, the fourth book after his long time away from the series) and I quite like the books.
Although, if you read all the books in a row like I just have, the plot progression structure of having two people in a room talking for 50 pages can seem a bit repetitive after a few times. Still fun to read, though |