|
Banned
(07-11-2012, 07:11 AM)
|
#201
|
|
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:12 AM)
|
#202
Hmm, not yet convinced, but it picked my interest for those reasons :
Pros : - it's 99$ - it's an open development platform - It has a fixed hardware to develop for - It's gamepad-centric (Android-touch games are ok when they are at their best, but this will force to develop "console-style" games rather than phone/tablet style games) - It has industry veterans to back it up (and therefore, a potential network to encourage small-time development from big industry players). - It might be a favored platform for promising, yet poor, indies. Cons : - They might not even get the logistic means to have a widespread distribution - The fact that it focuses on freeware and android development would mostly gather a Gigaton of shovelware and this might be messy to find your way to the true interesting titles. - It's not that powerfull (a bridge between last-gen and current-gen hardly something exciting, but seeing the scope of the project, it makes sense). - Will it get a dedicated development, in the middle of all those Android-based hardware? Certainly not an actual contender to have a major spot in the console-market, but it could, at it's best, be an alternative for small games (Arcade-style). |
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:13 AM)
|
#203
whats the point of this? its not that clear cut to me. curious, would you say that an android tablet is not a big android phone? it runs the same damn OS.
i think you can get your answer from page 2 if you bothered to read it. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:14 AM)
|
#204
I asked on page 1, but I still haven't seen a clear and concise answer.
Can someone please explain the appeal of this thing to me when pretty much anyone with a PC capable of running a modern Internet browser already has more powerful hardware and is running an open platform? I just don't understand what's going on here. |
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:16 AM)
|
#205
the clear and concise answer is this:
This is an android box that displays everything you would normally get on an android phone on a TV. And its probably going to be that you can only put stuff on it that is approved from a marketplace. ANNND the normal person is not going to be "hacking" this box. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:17 AM)
|
#207
Either way, the point is that there are a billion little things that can go wrong with a computer. At the very least you have to look for the programs you want and install codecs. This, you plug in and go to the (hopefully simple to use) app store. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:17 AM)
|
#208
Is that the crux of it? Am I missing something? |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:17 AM)
|
#209
Fixed-hardware to have a focused and optimized development (this is like, the major pro against PC development). Probably a more stream-lined experience (focused on gaming). Pre-equipped to play (with a pad included). |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:18 AM)
|
#210
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:18 AM)
|
#211
Wait, come to think of it, lack of accelerometer is a huge oversight. What about Android games that use tilting as their control input? They now have to come up with a new control scheme, that eventually could make their games less intuitive..
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:18 AM)
|
#212
Aside from the controller images being obvious cheaply-made renders, the device is promising.
As a media center, not a console. Android games are complete and utter garbage, and I see no reason for that to change with this thing, unless it blows up really big. People in this thread touting gameloft shovelware shooters as actual worthwhile videogames are out of their minds. Isn't the android marketplace rife with piracy these days? |
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:18 AM)
|
#214
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:21 AM)
|
#218
My brain hurts. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:22 AM)
|
#220
Oh yeah, it is for sure a TV thing. It's not that rare though unless you have a pretty new TV, and even then I assume it still happens sometimes. My TV is like four years old, my dad's is three maybe. I will be making sure my next one does't have that problem, that's for fuck sure. If you have a "just scan" mode or something like that, it won't be a problem.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:24 AM)
|
#223
Edit : in short ---> it cost less to develop for, requires a lesser hardware engineering knowledge and it would probably result in less-buggy games. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:25 AM)
|
#224
This looks like the type of thing that typically gets laughed off of the Internet. Like that Phantom streaming console from years back. I feel like I'm in bizarro world where some people actually seem to be interested in this thing. |
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:25 AM)
|
#225
you have to realize what kind of games you're talking about though. the free to play android games that take more than a few months to create aren't games that should be releasing on this thing. if they do, they have a bad business model.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:27 AM)
|
#226
I was hoping it was, if it's not, this has already lost my interest unfortunately.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:28 AM)
|
#227
|
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:28 AM)
|
#228
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:29 AM)
|
#230
That's also an issue, if this doesn't take off in the mass market it's not going to get much support, unlike the smartphone market in which games are guaranteed to have a large audience of casual gamers at the very least and thus developers interest. I mean, if the Xperia Play had trouble getting developers to support it's controller I hope these guys have a good marketing plan.
Last edited by SparkTR; 07-11-2012 at 07:33 AM.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:32 AM)
|
#232
I'm not saying it will catch on and be successful enough to be even worthwhile for developers, in the long run, but you're acting confused as to why this product exists when it's very clear why. Most people do not want to mess with the hassle of building and setting up a PC when they can just plug a box into their tv to play games. If they did consoles would cease to exist. |
|
No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
(07-11-2012, 07:32 AM)
|
#233
This isn't exciting as a console, since it won't be even as powerful as an iPhone.
That being said, I'd be interested if it had Netflix, HBO Go, Amazon Video, and all those fancy services. As well as software to easily stream video from my PC to TV. I could see this functioning as a light PC for your TV, and that's exciting for $99. A game console though? Get real. It'll probably be like an HD Wii. =P We'll see plenty of shovelware and garbage, and by the time it comes out, it'll already be very outdated compared to modern Android phones. Don't even think it won't be. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:33 AM)
|
#234
It's either a modified PS3 controller or the same PS3 controller as the test units, that were given out before launch.
Last edited by Anastacio; 07-11-2012 at 07:40 AM.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:40 AM)
|
#236
this is my biggest worry, will any developer after the launch be bothered to spend time and money doing a custom version for this thing?
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:40 AM)
|
#237
PCs are plugged into TVs the same way consoles are! But the Ouya would be destroyed by that PC in not only GFX but also the number of games it can play.
Being able to "hack" your console has nothing to do with cracking into someone else's! Emulation is not illegal and iOS and normal Android have them. |
|
you can't put a price on sparks
(07-11-2012, 07:41 AM)
|
#238
Quote:
Quote:
this android box might be simplistic for the end user (one would hope, who knows how the console's OS will end up being) but this is missing some very big features from a normal android machine that will question some game's portability and design decisions. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:43 AM)
|
#239
It depends entirely on how well it sells in the mass market and how large of an issue piracy will be. At the very least it will be a cheap low-end emulation and media machine.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:48 AM)
|
#241
A decent computer destroying this is besides the point. If you're in the market for a cheap media player (which is what they should sell this as) you probably aren't going to jump to a $400 PC. I know tons of people who have media players. I know one other person who plugs their computer into their TV. Even though it seems simple to us, it is beyond most people if only for the fact that they would never even dream of it. To get it first. And you figure you save a bit by not having to pay taxes. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:50 AM)
|
#242
(yes its not in HD but its the perfect emulation machine and it can be hooked up to the TV) |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:51 AM)
|
#243
People with no clue probably aren't on Kickstarter backing this thing. People with no clue are probably going to buy an Apple TV or a Roku or something. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#245
Well, yeah it depends on getting Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon. But, as I said, I know plenty of people who have media players of different varieties who would have no clue how to get their computer hooked up to a TV, and would never even think of it. And it may just flat out be inconvenient for them, since a lot of people don't have computers near their TV. This also has wifi, so in theory you could stream your media off your PC. |
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#246
It has a trackpad, not ideal for touchscreen games. Something like a simplified Wii-U controller would have been nice, but way out of the price-range of this device.
Last edited by SparkTR; 07-11-2012 at 07:59 AM.
|
|
(07-11-2012, 08:00 AM)
|
#248
The game demos really look like shit, and the biggest problem is not them not looking pretty. I was ready to send them $99 but I'm glad I watched that video first.
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 08:03 AM)
|
#249
|
|
Member
(07-11-2012, 08:06 AM)
|
#250
The Tegra 3 Version of Dead Trigger is also really impressive graphically
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpzkCTe76Bc |