|
Member
(07-30-2012, 09:10 PM)
|
#152
Scientists from Britain and other European nations can prepare for a launch in 2022 after the JUpiter ICy moon Explorer (JUICE) project was formally sanctioned at a meeting in Paris on May 3, 2012. Upon arrival in the Jovian system in 2030, the JUICE probe will perform a series of close passes by two of Jupiter's moons, Callisto and Europa, before orbiting and eventually crashing into a third, Ganymede. More data is needed before planning a trip to the Jovian satellites, let along Saturn's.
Last edited by Partial Gamification; 07-30-2012 at 09:22 PM.
Reason: Titan link added, date added to JUICE link
|
|
(07-30-2012, 09:17 PM)
|
#154
|
![]() (07-30-2012, 10:22 PM)
|
#157
If found this informative video about the mission. It details the rover, objectives and landing site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1coV7XqE1M For example, did you notice that Curiosity doesn't have solar panels? It runs on Plutonium. That's right Marty, this sucker is nuclear.
Last edited by ckohler; 07-30-2012 at 10:27 PM.
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 01:01 AM)
|
#160
|
|
Kills Photobucket
(07-31-2012, 01:16 PM)
|
#162
Dueling videos about the landing.
William Fucking Shatner Version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nttnecwEku8 Wil Wheaton Version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-I1CfgIyNU |
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 02:02 PM)
|
#167
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 02:20 PM)
|
#169
So, we've been to Venus (albeit for a few minutes, and not really us but you know what I mean). Adding in Titan and Europa, along with Mars...
It makes me more than excited for privatized space travel/rockets/exploration. It makes me think that we can actually explore and get there. Make new outposts, find new sources of fuel and materials to sustain humanity, use as launch points for less expensive research... Forgive the starry-eyed dreamy stuff there, but wow. That my son might live to see a man on Mars or a fish in an underwater lake on a moon and make something of it is wonderful. |
|
Boring Member
(07-31-2012, 02:36 PM)
|
#171
I wonder, the rovers that went to Mars and took all those pictures... do they randomly decide when to take those? I mean, that sunset pic can't just be a coincidence. Do they go wherever they want using some kind of complicated program? I can't believe they are actually remotely controlled by humans considering the distance.
And since this is still kinda ontopic... are they planning to send another probe to the more distant planets for more detailed pictures than some probe from the 70s? As far as i know, only one actually went close to Neptune and Uranus. |
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 02:47 PM)
|
#176
From NASA's site:
Quote:
|
|
Banned
(07-31-2012, 02:49 PM)
|
#178
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 02:53 PM)
|
#179
|
|
#1 fly (for a white guy) fisher
(07-31-2012, 02:54 PM)
|
#180
The optics on that camera is probably in a league of its own, nothing can compare it to the likes you can buy in shops I guess. even if it is only 2mp.
|
|
STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
(07-31-2012, 02:54 PM)
|
#181
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 02:55 PM)
|
#182
Quote:
|
|
#1 fly (for a white guy) fisher
(07-31-2012, 02:57 PM)
|
#183
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 03:49 PM)
|
#190
Here is a very neat simulation software of the rover that you can use in real time or skip to the descent stage and see the whole process.
http://eyes.jpl.nasa.gov/ |
|
(07-31-2012, 05:27 PM)
|
#191
|
|
Boring Member
(07-31-2012, 05:37 PM)
|
#193
Because its not a rover on some dangerous mission in enemy territory? :P It's for studies and pictures(videos?) on a barren planet. Unless you think the small chance of finding living bacterias is worth making the laser lethal? :lol
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 05:41 PM)
|
#194
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 06:14 PM)
|
#195
Even if living organisms are found, why the heck would you want to destroy them? |
|
Boring Member
(07-31-2012, 06:52 PM)
|
#196
Oh wait, i got it backward. :P But really, finding something alive someday, even if its bacterias, would be pretty awesome. I think i remember hearing that they found something from some martian meteorite with them, but it was just fossils and not 100% confirmed of being from Mars. |
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 07:03 PM)
|
#199
|
|
Member
(07-31-2012, 07:21 PM)
|
#200
|