|
Member
(08-01-2012, 06:56 PM)
|
#51
|
|
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 06:56 PM)
|
#52
How is that hyperbolic? Most posts in this thread are exactly that. That is, the argument that the rich don’t pay enough taxes, the middle-class / poor pay too much, and that is why everything is in the shitter.
If anything the article itself is hyperbolic, in that Romney’s tax plan makes no mention of any tax increases for the middle class at all; and the report makes the assumption that the middle class must end up paying more taxes to make up for lost revenues, even though Romney’s actual plan says nothing of the sort. |
|
fuck yo restraining order
(08-01-2012, 06:56 PM)
|
#54
Originally Posted by On the Distributional Effects of Base-Broadening Income Tax Reform:
|
|
The Mayuh of f'n Bawston
(08-01-2012, 06:56 PM)
|
#55
Last edited by Neuromancer; 08-01-2012 at 07:03 PM.
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 06:57 PM)
|
#57
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:00 PM)
|
#60
Romney, as the actual nominee, will get a thread whenever he does something 'shithead' like. Which is very often. |
|
Prefers her Trek sans Abrams
(08-01-2012, 07:05 PM)
|
#65
What's even more amazing about this is the Romney campagin is decrying the sources on this as biased when the campaign called the same people unbiased when they used their figures to say Rick Perry's plan raised taxes on millions of Americans back in the primary.
|
|
If I want to pay a black man $20 to suck him off in a public bathroom, by God and Country, I SHALL.
(08-01-2012, 07:06 PM)
|
#67
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:08 PM)
|
#68
I thought that was the case. Regardless of the political implications I think the most interesting part of the report are the figures they calculate for what could be raised by eliminating certain tax exemptions. I am looking forward to reading what they came up with.
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:10 PM)
|
#71
Read the report here: http://www.brookings.edu/research/pa...wn-gale-looney
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:14 PM)
|
#76
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:15 PM)
|
#79
All taxes need to go up. I applaud him raising taxes on middle class, but the top 10% should go up as well.
He won't be elected, though, and Obama won't raise taxes on the middle class. EDIT: I am a middle-class republican, but have nothing to do with today's current crop of retardation emanating from the word holes of mouth breathers like Reince Preibus and Grover Norquist. |
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:15 PM)
|
#80
thefuckisthisshit.jpg
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:15 PM)
|
#81
Are...are you serious? You're not. I think. I don't know your post history, so I'm not sure.
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:17 PM)
|
#82
|
|
Banned
(08-01-2012, 07:17 PM)
|
#83
|
|
PoliGAF Co-Champion
(08-01-2012, 07:20 PM)
|
#84
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:22 PM)
|
#85
We've got the Congressional Budget Office for that. Unfortunately, we also have policy think tanks like the Brookings and CATO Institute that are both highly influential and politically motivated. They put out a lot of great research, but they often muddle the waters when it comes to the public getting a clear picture about the benefits/consquences of proposed or enacted policies.
|
|
Banned
(08-01-2012, 07:23 PM)
|
#86
So what's your opinion on rising income inequality in the US and its repercussions on the economy long term?
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:32 PM)
|
#88
|
|
Freestyler
(08-01-2012, 07:38 PM)
|
#89
You aren't forced, you could just not submit your plans (which I believe the PVV did at least once, and I suspect they will do again). Other parties will just use it against you as political ammo, because it basically proves it's no good anyway, and that you are aware of it.
|
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:42 PM)
|
#90
Quote:
|
|
Utah: A nation of criminals
(08-01-2012, 07:48 PM)
|
#93
On the plus side, it's better than Herman Cain's proposal.
/brightersideofthings |
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:52 PM)
|
#94
|
|
Junior Member
(08-01-2012, 07:53 PM)
|
#96
![]() Really? He's more of a shitbag than Obama? This election is about one thing and one thing only: lesser of two evils and Romney wins handily when it comes to the economy which is what this presidential election is all about. |
|
Member
(08-01-2012, 07:55 PM)
|
#99
If he came out and said, "Raising taxes across the board is fair and necessary to maintain the country and build it for the future" Then I would consider voting for him. As he is now, he is beholden to his bundlers and donors who are complete retards. |