|
Junior Member
(08-02-2012, 12:08 AM)
|
Notch: Windows 8 could be "very, very bad for indie developers"
#1
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Banned
(08-02-2012, 12:16 AM)
|
#2
I don't know an awful lot about the eco-system that MS have planned if I'm honest...
it sounds like everyone fears that Microsoft is trying to create an Xbox-style walled garden marketplace for the PC... is that really well-founded? Is this essentially about the Windows Marketplace? |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#4
What, they're just gonna allow everything to be published in their app store, free of charge? Doesn't sound like the Microsoft I know.
|
|
Corporate Ballwasher
Ignore everything I say (08-02-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#6
Eh? More development choices, more transparent approval system and less of a platform holder take probably means it's better than any currently existing marketplace. It's like saying the Apple App Store was bad for indies because it's not open.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:21 AM)
|
#8
Pay for patching? That doesn't sound that great for an indie dev.
|
|
If this poster agrees with you, you're doing something very wrong.
(08-02-2012, 12:21 AM)
|
#9
i think the point was that before you could do whatever you wanted... so it was as free as free could be free... now it is locked. This is for Metro.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:21 AM)
|
#10
Can someone please explain these concerns to me? I'm rolling with Windows 8 no matter what, but I'm at a loss as to why three separate developers/studios have come out against it in recent days.
Especially considering the desktop is there and is not being locked down in anyway as far as I know. |
|
FIND ME AN ESCORT
NO SHARP KNEEEEEEES (08-02-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#13
Wouldnt that mean an internet browser couldnt exist? I dont get it, will windows automatically detect transaction based pages and ban them? Or do they require all apps to have a ms store signature to be able to be installed?
|
|
If this poster agrees with you, you're doing something very wrong.
(08-02-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#15
Now if Metro had an option to install games from anywhere, then it would be no difference, but Metro is locked down. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#16
no. Microsoft is also having an app store. The way they are trying to get people to put stuff on there is by taking less once something sells over $20,000 (Normal would be 30% and after 20k it will be 20%).
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:27 AM)
|
#18
But Valve isn't going to produce Metro games/apps I assume? Neither is Blizzard. Notch I can see maybe falling into that camp, but even then, he could elect to just make a windows installation package.
|
|
A bitter, cynical, safe moist as dude
(08-02-2012, 12:27 AM)
|
#19
You can still install and put on the desktop whatever you want. No matter where you bought it.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:27 AM)
|
#20
I meant that it's not like on XBLA for instance where either a publish or Ms have to pick your game, or even steam where they have to agree to publish your game. You pay the fee, and as long as your game complies with the rules you are in. |
|
Corporate Ballwasher
Ignore everything I say (08-02-2012, 12:28 AM)
|
#21
There is no pay to patch on the Windows Store.
You can still do that or you can use Metro which has much wider visibility. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:28 AM)
|
#23
Metro is an online store so of course its gonna be locked down. The problem is that it automatically becomes a huge competitor because its integrated into the OS. People don't have to go out and explore when they can easily fire up an app store the moment they start up their system.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:28 AM)
|
#24
As long as the Windows marketplace is just a tile that you click on, and Steam and Blizzard, and Mojang can have their own marketplace tiles... then I honestly don't see a problem.
OTOH, if integration is deeper, and interaction with W8 regularly shunts you towards the Windows 8 marketplace, then yeah, that's a lawsuit waiting to happen. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:29 AM)
|
#26
Wait. And this is bad...how? Not saying that you're saying it's bad, but more competition and more money to developers is a good thing.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:30 AM)
|
#29
Otherwise, I don't see the point of making such negative comments about Windows 8. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:31 AM)
|
#30
The default UI is Metro, similar to the Xbox dashboard and their UI on tablets and smartphones. There's still a desktop, but Metro also replaces the Start Menu and a few interface functions. Apps for Metro are a lot like smartphone apps, being limited to a particular API and only running in certain environments, which Microsoft can lock down to their own store. Desktop apps will still be available through any means, but Metro (and Microsoft's default app store) will be prevalent and locked down throughout the whole system.
|
|
Banned
(08-02-2012, 12:31 AM)
|
#31
This is my understanding as well, and restrictions only come into play when using metro/windows store-designed software. So don't use it and stick to downloads as usual from the internet. What's with all the bitching from devs?
Last edited by ultim8p00; 08-02-2012 at 12:33 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:33 AM)
|
#33
The guys that are mad are the ones that have online stores. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:33 AM)
|
#34
This could potentially be great for indie devs. They have a platform they can be promoted on, just like on Android/iOS. Nothing makes them go Windows only. |
|
you are not alone
(08-02-2012, 12:33 AM)
|
#35
Of course desktop apps/game will not have that restriction. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:35 AM)
|
#38
You won't be forced to sell your app on the Windows Store. Only if you want your game to run on Windows RT/Windows Phone 8/perhaps the next Xbox (as they share code) do you have to be on the Windows Store. If you just want to sell your game on Steam or on PC like you always could, then just forget the Windows Store and do what you want. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:35 AM)
|
#39
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:36 AM)
|
#40
|
|
Banned
(08-02-2012, 12:36 AM)
|
#41
Last edited by ultim8p00; 08-02-2012 at 12:39 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:37 AM)
|
#43
We probably don't know enough at this point to understand why so many of these companies are up in arms about this, or it may be over nothing. I would understand their fears about a Microsoft controlled ecosystem though, since they're looking for a foothold in just about everything.
Last edited by Berordn; 08-02-2012 at 12:39 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:37 AM)
|
#44
They don't have to sell through metro. IMO the real problem is that MS is releasing an app store that is integrated into windows. These guys are floating the idea of MS locking things down to scare their customers into making noise. |
|
Member
(08-02-2012, 12:39 AM)
|
#49
There's... a lot of misinformation going around.
Windows 8 doesn't do anything specifically wrong. Windows RT, the tablet variation, does lock things down, though. It's not shocking, given that it's a different architecture, so apps programmed for the desktop wouldn't be able to run natively on it anyway. Windows 8 doesn't lock you into using Metro programs. You can still run anything you want. You also don't have to buy apps through the app store. You can still install anything you want from any source. The problem with Windows 8 is that, inside of Metro, you are constrained by certain restrictions and app sources. And that's quite a change for Microsoft. Windows 8 won't stop you from doing what you want, it won't lock down or lock you out, but it's dipping its toes in that water. As is OSX. As is, really, every OS but Linux. When all these developers say they think Windows 8 is a bad move, it's not because it's a bad OS. It's because it might mean the start of a shift towards a walled garden, which would be bad for pretty much everyone. It's the first step down the road of destruction. Possibly. Maybe. If we're not careful. The existence of Windows RT suggests we should proceed very, very cautiously. This is, at least, what I understand the situation to be. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. |
|
Banned
(08-02-2012, 12:39 AM)
|
#50
|