|
(08-06-2012, 12:46 PM)
|
U.S. senators want military intervention in Syria
#1
Quote:
|
|
|
|
(08-06-2012, 12:49 PM)
|
#3
Why is it always McCain and Lieberman? Dont these guys have other stuff to legislate?
Though its important not to overreact-
Quote:
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:50 PM)
|
#6
Quote:
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:54 PM)
|
#14
"Let Rwanda or the Balkans sort themselves out" |
|
aka Meus Renaissance
(08-06-2012, 01:00 PM)
|
#21
I think thats a standardised format for any such opinion piece by a senator.
As the war in [insert region here] intensifies, a growing sense of concern dawns in the world of the state of [insert oppressed people here]. At a period of time where our country is looked upon to lead in democracy and liberty of all, we cannot waiver in our pursuit of freedom for the [insert oppressed people here]. The price of inaction is far too great, not just for the people of [insert country here], but our nations interests. We must employ our American values to counter this great evil from [insert enemy here] and our great nation will not rest until it is so. Unfortunately the [insert opposing party administration] have adopted a soft approach, weakening our global standing at the cost of the lives of countless innocent [insert oppressed people here]. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#29
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
#30
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:31 PM)
|
#32
God can't do anything to stop us because Russia keeps refusing to Vote.
Just cause they gots Russian Orthodox they think they can be all high and mighty. That's why they're stepping up the pressure, what would happen to all of those precious natural resources if we don't step in and help them? |
|
(08-06-2012, 01:56 PM)
|
#35
I think it's absolutely right that we should be looking to aid Syrian civilians. A no-fly zone should be a must. Turkish or Arab manned safe-zones too. I know some people think it's incoherent to argue against Iraq on the one hand but in favour of intervention in Syria (and formerly, Libya)... but it's really not. There's a world of difference between invading and replacing a regime unspurred, and aiding a civilian population already in rebellion in doing so. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:02 PM)
|
#37
Well, the point is that they can't defeat the government - so the situation over there is constantly worsening with innocents being killed.
Bit short sighted to say that when it's clear that this has been the intention from the off. |
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 02:06 PM)
|
#38
How come american senators do not call for action when robert mugabe is killing his people or north koreans for example or even gencoide is taking place in ogaden where eithopians kill ethnic somalis?
How come their eyes lit up when it involves arab countries? |
|
(08-06-2012, 02:20 PM)
|
#39
If North Korea was in open revolt I'd absolutely call for intervention against the government there. But it's not. If Zimbabwe had descended into an actual civil war, again I'd have called for intervention. Similarly had the West intervened in Iraq's rebellion following the first Gulf War I'd have been in favour. There's a world of difference between supporting a popular movement and turning up unannounced to take over. |
|
May the best mouth win
(08-06-2012, 03:07 PM)
|
#44
So America is the world police again when it's convenient? Fuck that. Go get'em EU.
|
|
#partoftheproblem
(08-06-2012, 03:13 PM)
|
#47
Syria is in a very, very bad spot.
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:14 PM)
|
#48
|
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 03:16 PM)
|
#49
USA basically chickened out of Georgia, i am not sure, why they did it. There was an explanation, they did it in return for something else. Anyone remember the Putin 3 hour documentary, interviewing basically everyone from Rice to Ivanov. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:17 PM)
|
#50
It sucks that Syrians are suffering because of it, but it's just incredibly bad timing. |