shinobi602
(08-06-2012, 12:46 PM)

shinobi602's Avatar
U.S. senators want military intervention in Syria #1

Quote:
Three prominent US senators have called for direct US military aid to Syrian rebels, including use of US air power to protect rebel-controlled areas in the country.

The senators -- John McCain, Joseph Lieberman and Lindsey Graham - said in an op-ed piece in The Washington Post they were aware of the risks associated with deepening US involvement in the conflict in Syria.

"But inaction carries even greater risks for the United States -- in lives lost, strategic opportunities squandered and values compromised," they argued.

The senators said the United States should "directly and openly" provide assistance to the armed opposition, including weapons, intelligence and training.

"Whatever the risks of our doing so, they are far outweighed by the risks of continuing to sit on our hands, hoping for the best," they said.

The authors noted that US help should go to those groups that reject extremism and sectarianism in both word and deed. The senators said the United States should work with its allies to reinforce those areas within Syria that the rebels have established as de facto safe zones.

"This would not require any US troops on the ground but could involve limited use of our airpower and other unique US assets," they wrote.

The lawmakers did not specify what assets they had in mind.

The senators warned that because of its reluctance to assist the Syrian rebels, the United States is increasingly seen across the Middle East as acquiescing to the continued slaughter of Arab and Muslim civilians.

"This reluctance to lead will, we fear -- like our failure to stop the slaughter of the Kurds and Shiites under Saddam Hussein in Iraq or of the Tutsis in Rwanda - haunt our nation for years to come," they concluded.

The appeal came as Syrian regime warplanes pounded rebel positions in the country's second city of Aleppo on Sunday ahead of a threatened ground assault by more than 20,000 troops assembled around the commercial capital.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/bre...-1226443880074
Shit...this is getting out of hand, fast.
neoemonk
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:49 PM)

neoemonk's Avatar
#2

Let China handle it now. They're the rich superpower using all the oil.
Escape Goat
(08-06-2012, 12:49 PM)

Escape Goat's Avatar
#3

Why is it always McCain and Lieberman? Dont these guys have other stuff to legislate?

Though its important not to overreact-

Quote:
Shit...this is getting out of hand, fast.
Doh.
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
(08-06-2012, 12:49 PM)

Funky Papa's Avatar
#4

Either use a UN mandate (as impossible as it may be) or let the Middle East sort itself out, FFS.

Originally Posted by neoemonk: View Post
Let China handle it now. They're the rich superpower using all the oil.
You could say they are handling it...
Darklord
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:50 PM)

Darklord's Avatar
#5

metalslimer
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:50 PM)

metalslimer's Avatar
#6

Quote:
The senators warned that because of its reluctance to assist the Syrian rebels, the United States is increasingly seen across the Middle East as acquiescing to the continued slaughter of Arab and Muslim civilians.
Do they even understand how the middle east views us? The US is already seen as doing that after Iraq and its even worse with Iran. Donate money and funds sure, but we don't have to deploy our own weapons here.
jchap
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:51 PM)

jchap's Avatar
#7

It is probably in the best interest of the US to let the civil war play out. Assad's power is weakened by the rebellions and even if he manages to suppress the war, its a reoccurring problem he will have to deal with for decades to comes.
Wilsongt
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:51 PM)

Wilsongt's Avatar
#8

Fuck off, Lindsey Graham. You always want military intervention.
Half and half
Banned
(08-06-2012, 12:52 PM)

Half and half's Avatar
#9

We're broke, we'll get the next one maybe.
Technosteve
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:52 PM)

Technosteve's Avatar
#10

Republicans smh
Salvor.Hardin
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:53 PM)

Salvor.Hardin's Avatar
#11

Lieberman lol. Dude needs to join the Republican party.
neoemonk
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:53 PM)

neoemonk's Avatar
#12

Originally Posted by Funky Papa: View Post
You could say they are handling it...
I don't understand what you mean.
marrec
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:54 PM)

marrec's Avatar
#13

Another week, another Op Ed by Mcain, Lieberman, and Graham calling for us to go to war.
el retorno
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:54 PM)

el retorno's Avatar
#14

Originally Posted by Funky Papa: View Post
Either use a UN mandate (as impossible as it may be) or let the Middle East sort itself out, FFS.
I'm not sure where I stand on this with Syria but in general why do people keep saying this? Why they hell should we always be beholden to an institution which doesn't always get it right?

"Let Rwanda or the Balkans sort themselves out"
Wilsongt
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:54 PM)

Wilsongt's Avatar
#15

Originally Posted by neoemonk: View Post
I don't understand what you mean.
They're buddy-buddy.
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
(08-06-2012, 12:55 PM)

Funky Papa's Avatar
#16

Originally Posted by neoemonk: View Post
I don't understand what you mean.
China and Russia are propping up the regime.
Forsete
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:55 PM)

Forsete's Avatar
#17

Originally Posted by Funky Papa: View Post
Either use a UN mandate (as impossible as it may be) or let the Middle East sort itself out, FFS.
*nods*

It is probably for the best.
neoemonk
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:55 PM)

neoemonk's Avatar
#18

Originally Posted by Wilsongt: View Post
They're buddy-buddy.
Oh. That seems sinister for some reason.
themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
(08-06-2012, 12:57 PM)

themadcowtipper's Avatar
#19

Originally Posted by Technosteve: View Post
Republicans smh
Yes because democrats do not want to get involved..........hence why we are using the CIA, and money to arm the rebels.
Clevinger
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:59 PM)

Clevinger's Avatar
#20

When I read the title I figured: Rubio, McCain, and Graham. I only got one wrong.
Jason Raize '75 - '04
aka Meus Renaissance
(08-06-2012, 01:00 PM)

Jason Raize '75 - '04's Avatar
#21

Originally Posted by metalslimer: View Post
Do they even understand how the middle east views us?
I think thats a standardised format for any such opinion piece by a senator.
As the war in [insert region here] intensifies, a growing sense of concern dawns in the world of the state of [insert oppressed people here]. At a period of time where our country is looked upon to lead in democracy and liberty of all, we cannot waiver in our pursuit of freedom for the [insert oppressed people here]. The price of inaction is far too great, not just for the people of [insert country here], but our nations interests. We must employ our American values to counter this great evil from [insert enemy here] and our great nation will not rest until it is so. Unfortunately the [insert opposing party administration] have adopted a soft approach, weakening our global standing at the cost of the lives of countless innocent [insert oppressed people here].
Steelrain
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:02 PM)

Steelrain's Avatar
#22

Nope, way too late now.

They'll get their own houses in order.
BertramCooper
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:04 PM)

BertramCooper's Avatar
#23

We can't afford it - financially or politically.
entrement
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:06 PM)

entrement's Avatar
#24

Can we just give up on the Middle East? It's a lost cause in terms of Western intervention.
Utako
Banned
(08-06-2012, 01:22 PM)
#25

NO.

STOP.
Canis lupus
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:23 PM)

Canis lupus's Avatar
#26

Drop some ammo on FSA and they're good to go, maybe some old M1A1 tanks in the depots.
glaurung
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:25 PM)

glaurung's Avatar
#27

Presidents who start a war during their term in office always get re-elected.

Not counting the wars that Obama has started already, imagine how much of an awesome guy he becomes when he starts world war three?

Change you can believe in.
Gustav
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:25 PM)

Gustav's Avatar
#28

Yes, please. If a regime is killing its own people outside forces need to step in.
glaurung
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:27 PM)

glaurung's Avatar
#29

Originally Posted by Gustav: View Post
Yes, please. If a regime is killing its own people outside forces need to step in.
Who polices the world police?
Gustav
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:28 PM)

Gustav's Avatar
#30

Originally Posted by glaurung: View Post
God.
KingBeyondTheWall
Junior Member
(08-06-2012, 01:29 PM)

KingBeyondTheWall's Avatar
#31

No. No. No. No. NO!

Terrible idea. The members of government are already stepping down as seen in the news today. Let it work out on its own, we've got more problems here in our own country.
marrec
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:31 PM)

marrec's Avatar
#32

Originally Posted by Gustav: View Post
God.
God can't do anything to stop us because Russia keeps refusing to Vote.

Just cause they gots Russian Orthodox they think they can be all high and mighty.

Originally Posted by KingBeyondTheWall: View Post
No. No. No. No. NO!

Terrible idea. The members of government are already stepping down as seen in the news today. Let it work out on its own, we've got more problems here in our own country.
That's why they're stepping up the pressure, what would happen to all of those precious natural resources if we don't step in and help them?
thefro
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:34 PM)
#33

Shocking news, the 3 biggest war hawks in the Senate want war.
Edag Plata
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:35 PM)

Edag Plata's Avatar
#34

The Three Stooges of the Senate.
Sir Fragula
(08-06-2012, 01:56 PM)

Sir Fragula's Avatar
#35

Originally Posted by KingBeyondTheWall: View Post
No. No. No. No. NO!

Terrible idea. The members of government are already stepping down as seen in the news today. Let it work out on its own, we've got more problems here in our own country.
There are large-scale defections from the periphery of the Syrian regime, but it still has enormous capacity to inflict violence on protesters.

I think it's absolutely right that we should be looking to aid Syrian civilians. A no-fly zone should be a must. Turkish or Arab manned safe-zones too. I know some people think it's incoherent to argue against Iraq on the one hand but in favour of intervention in Syria (and formerly, Libya)... but it's really not. There's a world of difference between invading and replacing a regime unspurred, and aiding a civilian population already in rebellion in doing so.
Choke on the Magic
May the best mouth win
(08-06-2012, 02:00 PM)

Choke on the Magic's Avatar
#36

I think we've met our military intervention quota for the first quarter of this century. Win you own freedom Syria. Let the EU get involved they're closer.
Ravensmash
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:02 PM)

Ravensmash's Avatar
#37

Originally Posted by Choke on the Magic: View Post
Win you own freedom Syria.
Well, the point is that they can't defeat the government - so the situation over there is constantly worsening with innocents being killed.

Bit short sighted to say that when it's clear that this has been the intention from the off.
Grim1ock
Banned
(08-06-2012, 02:06 PM)
#38

How come american senators do not call for action when robert mugabe is killing his people or north koreans for example or even gencoide is taking place in ogaden where eithopians kill ethnic somalis?

How come their eyes lit up when it involves arab countries?
Sir Fragula
(08-06-2012, 02:20 PM)

Sir Fragula's Avatar
#39

Originally Posted by Grim1ock: View Post
How come american senators do not call for action when robert mugabe is killing his people or north koreans for example or even gencoide is taking place in ogaden where eithopians kill ethnic somalis?

How come their eyes lit up when it involves arab countries?
Opportunity.

If North Korea was in open revolt I'd absolutely call for intervention against the government there. But it's not. If Zimbabwe had descended into an actual civil war, again I'd have called for intervention.

Similarly had the West intervened in Iraq's rebellion following the first Gulf War I'd have been in favour.

There's a world of difference between supporting a popular movement and turning up unannounced to take over.
Brinbe
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:22 PM)

Brinbe's Avatar
#40

Quote:
John McCain, Joseph Lieberman and Lindsey Graham
Fuck outta here...
Baraka in the White House
2-Terms of Kombat
(08-06-2012, 02:24 PM)

Baraka in the White House's Avatar
#41

Seems like it's ALWAYS McCain, Lieberman and Graham.
PBalfredo
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:02 PM)

PBalfredo's Avatar
#42

Damn, GAF, what's with the stance against helping Syria? Is it just an overall weariness of war overriding empathy or is there some reason to not believe Syrians deserve assistance against their government who are massacring civilians?
Awesome
Banned
(08-06-2012, 03:04 PM)
#43

This country does need help, the people are defenseless there and Assad is going nowhere unless forced out.
Choke on the Magic
May the best mouth win
(08-06-2012, 03:07 PM)

Choke on the Magic's Avatar
#44

Originally Posted by Ravensmash: View Post
Well, the point is that they can't defeat the government - so the situation over there is constantly worsening with innocents being killed.

Bit short sighted to say that when it's clear that this has been the intention from the off.
So America is the world police again when it's convenient? Fuck that. Go get'em EU.
Sealda
Banned
(08-06-2012, 03:10 PM)

Sealda's Avatar
#45

Yes, that would be more honest than black ops operations.
Bamelin
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:10 PM)

Bamelin's Avatar
#46

What would China and Russia actually do if the US rolled into Syria under a coalition of the willing type deal?

Nothing? Or ww3?
DY_nasty
#partoftheproblem
(08-06-2012, 03:13 PM)
#47

Originally Posted by PBalfredo: View Post
Damn, GAF, what's with the stance against helping Syria? Is it just an overall weariness of war overriding empathy or is there some reason to not believe Syrians deserve assistance against their government who are massacring civilians?
Syria is in a very, very bad spot.
Omegasquash
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:14 PM)

Omegasquash's Avatar
#48

Originally Posted by Bamelin: View Post
What would China and Russia actually do if the US rolled into Syria under a coalition of the willing type deal?

Nothing? Or ww3?
WW3 is a fear. UN backs rebels, Russia/China backs regime. I'm going to doubt that it would escalate to that level, but that's the fear.
Sealda
Banned
(08-06-2012, 03:16 PM)

Sealda's Avatar
#49

Originally Posted by Bamelin: View Post
What would China and Russia actually do if the US rolled into Syria under a coalition of the willing type deal?

Nothing? Or ww3?
I can see Russia, warning USA, that they would intervene militarily. At which point, USA would stop all plans to invade Syria.

USA basically chickened out of Georgia, i am not sure, why they did it. There was an explanation, they did it in return for something else. Anyone remember the Putin 3 hour documentary, interviewing basically everyone from Rice to Ivanov.
BertramCooper
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:17 PM)

BertramCooper's Avatar
#50

Originally Posted by PBalfredo: View Post
Damn, GAF, what's with the stance against helping Syria? Is it just an overall weariness of war overriding empathy or is there some reason to not believe Syrians deserve assistance against their government who are massacring civilians?
War fatigue + austerity + Russia/China politics

It sucks that Syrians are suffering because of it, but it's just incredibly bad timing.