|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:19 PM)
|
#151
To be clear I obviously haven't played the PC version yet so maybe they crapped that part up too, but it sounds very similar to how the console version handles internet disconnection and that's not an issue.
|
|
Junior Member
(08-09-2012, 01:20 PM)
|
#154
Since it's still better than the console version, yes. Go look at all the great reviews for the console version and all the people praising it. Now realize that the PC version is better than those. It's just getting a ton of hate because the game isn't up to PC game standards.
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:20 PM)
|
#156
How about you stop being over dramatic and condescending towards people who saved up money, took the time to build their own gaming rig or bought one, and expect to have the software to take advantage of their hardware. Does that sound crazy to you?
Last edited by Rayge; 08-09-2012 at 01:26 PM.
|
|
erotic butter maelstrom
(08-09-2012, 01:21 PM)
|
#158
Wow, so those rumors were true? I wasn't expecting a great port, but I did decide to put off really digging into the PS3 version so I could play the PC version instead. I almost prepurchased too, lol.
I guess some people don't grasp this, but many of us wanted to play this on PC for the advantages of playing a game on PC. I have a console, so a console-quality PC port does me no good. Dark Souls is in fact a great game, and it deserves better than this.
Last edited by Snuggler; 08-09-2012 at 01:25 PM.
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:21 PM)
|
#160
I've played games that are over 20 years of age to this day that resemble blops of paint, it was more of a question of "is actual gameplay is good enough?"
it sucks you don't have pc options, but MSAA options is not why I got into gaming. |
|
place a shoe on my head
to reduce lag compensation (08-09-2012, 01:22 PM)
|
#162
|
|
Banned
(08-09-2012, 01:22 PM)
|
#163
Asking $70 for a poorly optimised port with GFFWL to me doesn't make it better to me at all. Maybe if I play it offline on my TV. |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:22 PM)
|
#164
I find it hilarious that this will still be the best looking version of the game :X At least it's $40... so I'll buy it when it's $5 or something like that. |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:23 PM)
|
#165
Although this is unquestionably a horrible port, your sentence in the OP ("apparently the most incompetent port of all time") is definitely just one more example of the HORRIBLE hyperbole generation and its extremely polarized thinking. If it is a horrible port, then it is OF ALL TIME?
I strongly doubt that you had access to each and every pc port of all games - so even if you like sensationalist titles, this is still just bullshitting for the sake of attention. Me neither. You have a powerful sentence there, I love it. |
|
(08-09-2012, 01:23 PM)
|
#166
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#169
It might not even be the best looking. Running at a higher resolution that native will make it look worse than the console versions due to the vaseline.
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#172
|
|
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#173
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#174
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#176
It makes no sense to lock the frame rate and resolution, its up to the player to change the settings to fit their pc so they can get optimal performance on their hardware. Thats pretty much the sole reason for buying a game like this on the PC instead of on consoles. I was really interested in getting this. completely turned off from the idea now :/ |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:25 PM)
|
#178
Difference: Rogue Warrior is a shitty game, Dark Souls is a great game.
Yeah, the technical side of the port is disappointing but if that makes Dark Souls a no-buy for you, then you are no gamer in my eyes. You PC guys need to stop acting like Dark Souls is suddenly completely unplayable. Hundreds of thousands of console gamers were able to appreciate this great game despite it's technical shortcomings - because the content is awesome and that is what matters most in the end. Stop being in love with your hardware specs and learn to enjoy the actual game. |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:26 PM)
|
#181
So glad I didn't get caught in the hype and pre-order this. It's like the opposite of the Sleeping Dogs port.
Last edited by comrade; 08-09-2012 at 01:30 PM.
|
|
BOSS
(08-09-2012, 01:26 PM)
|
#182
Even with the issues it may be the go-to version of the game. |
|
mashadar's neko-mimi slave
(08-09-2012, 01:26 PM)
|
#183
This is a pretty sad situation all round. But pretty hilarious. Lol. |
|
STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
(08-09-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#184
Let me put this in perspective for some of you console dudes who just don't understand, apparently.
Would you think it was acceptable if a game's PS3 port was rendered at the same resolution as a Wii game and then just upscaled to your HD screen? |
|
Banned
(08-09-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#185
I've just realized no one should even expect this to be patched in a timely manner (if at all)... it's GFWL.
Did you just describe Black Ops on PS3? |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#186
Also yeah don't expect mods to fix this because it uses GFWL which prevents any file modifications. |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#187
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:27 PM)
|
#189
Everybody who is saying that we shouldn't be pissed because it is still the best version of the game is forgetting that if all other things are equal, the presence of gfwl and it's save game eating actually makes it the worst version. Not to mention that a company that can't figure out how to make a game that runs at different resolutions is almost certainly incapable of making a pc game that doesn't crash constantly. If they couldn't figure out even the most basic technical issues around porting a game to pc they should have outsourced it to someone who could. It's ridiculous to support crap like this.
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
#190
Originally Posted by Green Man Gaming:
If the internal rendering resolution sees a bump, I'll purchase the game at a later date. |
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
#192
I would buy Xenoblade for 360 that way. In a heartbeat.
|
|
erotic butter maelstrom
(08-09-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
#193
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
#194
Maybe not the best comparison considering what some "HD" games have rendered at this generation.
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:29 PM)
|
#196
Exactly, it depends on the game. I would definitely buy Xenoblade on the 360. |
|
Junior Member
(08-09-2012, 01:29 PM)
|
#197
I don't see people being able to justify the out of the box release which could/is going to be broken.
But if after a while editting the config files or mods take over and make it 100% better (or y'know, PATCHES), the game would be fine. Not sure if I'll give it another go on PC, I'm stuck on consoles in NG+. Freaking Four Kings :/. |
|
(08-09-2012, 01:29 PM)
|
#198
Cool, now I can play the game and use MSN at the same time
|
|
Member
(08-09-2012, 01:29 PM)
|
#199
Console only? All i own is a PS3 and all i own for that is DaS. My entire collection is on Steam and GOG. I just don't see the big deal. So what i can't play the game at 1080p or 60fps. I can at least play the game on my PC, i don't need to deal with PSN and a controller i dislike anymore. DaS isn't about graphics, its about the game and as long as it runs stable even at a meagre 30fps i could not give a damn.
|