|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:35 AM)
|
#107
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:35 AM)
|
#110
|
|
No Scrubs
(08-11-2012, 04:36 AM)
|
#111
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:36 AM)
|
#112
Yep, his best bet was to pick a moderate that conservatives would begrudingly vote for that had a good approval rating.
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:37 AM)
|
#116
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:37 AM)
|
#119
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:38 AM)
|
#121
The political calculus is so unbelievably messed up with a Ryan choice. Assuming that Obama carries Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico (which he almost certainly will), and the Obama campaign hammers the Ryan budget in Florida and manages to take the state, Obama will just have to win any other state to clinch it. Trading Wisconsin for Florida (although there's a slim chance Wisconsin will turn red this November) just seems ridiculous.
|
|
Banned
(08-11-2012, 04:38 AM)
|
#123
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:39 AM)
|
#127
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:42 AM)
|
#134
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:42 AM)
|
#137
edit: seriously. |
|
this avi makes no sense
(08-11-2012, 04:43 AM)
|
#138
Wow. Can't believe Mittens did this. If you had asked me what VP Obama would most like to run against, I would've said Ryan. Obama gets to double down on all the attacks that are already working. Makes Romney look even more aloof from the middle class and even more subservient to the right wing of the GOP. And what does he gain from it? Anything, other than rallying the base?
At least now Obama can beat Romney and discredit the Ryan plan in one fell swoop by winning this election. |
|
kids poo a lot
(08-11-2012, 04:43 AM)
|
#139
Look up complacent voters not showing up in 2010 and then Wisconsin shitstorm.
|
|
got my tag in the OT
(08-11-2012, 04:44 AM)
|
#142
Also it's not like it's a minor thing. Like I pointed out as Mccain found out a VP can't win your election but they can certainly lose it for you. |
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:45 AM)
|
#143
|
|
needs to fix his kismet
(08-11-2012, 04:45 AM)
|
#145
It wasn't change based on introspection or new information. It was a change based on political gamesmanship. 7 years prior, he's singing her praise, handing out copies of her books for Christmas, and saying she was the reason he got into politics. Once he's actually a visible political player on the national stage and draws scrutiny from Catholic leaders, magically is tone changes. Saying "It’s an atheist philosophy" and comparing his philosophy to that of a Catholic priest is too convenient given the source of the complaints.
|
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:45 AM)
|
#146
There is nobody Romney will realistically choose for VP that would make me happy. But I'm not voting for him, or anybody else for President this year anyways. |
|
Member
(08-11-2012, 04:46 AM)
|
#147
|
|
(08-11-2012, 04:48 AM)
|
#150
edit
|