|
Banned
(08-18-2012, 04:23 PM)
|
#101
Oh really, what qualifies as art for you? Is it not "Indie" enough for you? Let me guess..... Citizen Kane!
|
|
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:23 PM)
|
#102
Comic books haven't been good for kids since like, what, half a century (?). So many covers and panels this past decade have had half-naked characters and graphic scenes of violence. That's probably that's why the comic book industry is falling apart. No new audience entering the market, they are all still trying to appeal to the same comic book fans.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:24 PM)
|
#103
Indie doesn`t mean a movie is art either, or the other way around anyways. You`re just trying to make me sound like a snobby douche with your indie comment. And yes, I love Citizen Kane and think it is art.
Last edited by CFK; 08-18-2012 at 05:30 PM.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:25 PM)
|
#104
This thread is needed if he said the opposite. That would be shocking coming from a man like Cronenberg. |
|
make it rain, motherfucker
(08-18-2012, 04:30 PM)
|
#115
The average age of superhero comics is mid 20s now. At $4 a pop no kid can afford them. By definition, they're not made for kids.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:35 PM)
|
#121
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:38 PM)
|
#124
|
|
<3Tingle Loves Me<3
(08-18-2012, 04:38 PM)
|
#125
Sometimes I think that the term "graphic novel" can make sense for work that is published in a certain way. to the best of my knowledge, Craig Thompson's work is published originally large bound volumes, the way a traditional novel would be.
For the most part I avoid the term and simply call western comics, monthly comics, manga, and anything else "comics." If I'm feeling pretentious I might use the term "sequential art." |
|
Hail, peons, for I have come as ambassador from the great and bountiful Blueberry Butt Explosion
(08-18-2012, 04:38 PM)
|
#126
Superhero comics are about as adolescent as any mythological pantheon. The characters represent specific archetypes and make certain decisions in accordance to that archetype.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:39 PM)
|
#128
Sure, but the most successful and critically acclaimed superhero comics are the ones that turn those archetypes on their heads.
|
|
card-carrying scientician
(08-18-2012, 04:40 PM)
|
#130
I don't think I'd say Nolan's movies, or TDKR specifically, did that though. They explored the archetypes in some interesting ways but I'm really hard pressed to call anything about them subversive.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:43 PM)
|
#134
We just live in dark, edgy times. To make money you need to pander to the masses. In 10-20 years it will be a different take on superheroes that makes all the money and get all the praise. |
|
Banned
(08-18-2012, 04:43 PM)
|
#135
You may not like TDKR, but you can't say its not art, it can be shitty art in your eyes, it can be great art. Its still art. You don't get to decide what art is, unless of course I missed the memo. |
|
(08-18-2012, 04:44 PM)
|
#136
Most people discover Batman when they're kids. I'd hazard a guess most of us on GAF discovered Batman through a cartoon that used to air on FOX Kids in the 90s... younger people learn about Batman through newer cartoons... and older generations learned about Batman through the Adam West series in the 50s... so yeah... you can't be as popular a superhero as Batman without first appealing to kids.
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:45 PM)
|
#139
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:47 PM)
|
#142
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:49 PM)
|
#144
|
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:49 PM)
|
#145
the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance. any field using the skills or techniques of art: advertising art; industrial art. ALL film is art. |
|
Member
(08-18-2012, 04:51 PM)
|
#146
I never understood why people argue something someone made is not art. On what grounds? |
|
make it rain, motherfucker
(08-18-2012, 04:52 PM)
|
#150
|