|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:02 AM)
|
#51
I simply find it hilarious that he JUST said he wouldn't do anything about limiting abortion in the case of rape or incest in response to the Akin comments. |
|
|
|
USA schools learnt me up something good
(08-21-2012, 04:02 AM)
|
#52
|
|
dreams superior dreams
(08-21-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#54
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#55
What the hell happened to the republican party...
Guess what... I would rather pay more in taxes than have an inbred mouth breathing bible thumper try and tell me how to live my life. Your financial platform goes out the window when you try and use the bible to justify your social ideals. |
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(08-21-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#57
So the Dems add a gay marriage plank the GOP has a no abortion even in cases of rape & incest plank.
The gap between the parties is getting pretty big. |
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#58
As comical/pathetic/politically tone deaf as this may be, I sincerely implore everyone who will be voting for Obama in November to not get cocky and to focus on campaigning and getting out the vote. As batshit insane as the modern GOP is rapidly becoming (or became decades ago), do not underestimate the stupidity/malaise of the average voter or the lengths to which the GOP will go to win.
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:05 AM)
|
#61
|
|
Banned
(08-21-2012, 04:05 AM)
|
#62
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:06 AM)
|
#63
the chilean right-wing parties have been doing pretty much the same for ages. Hell, abortion is illegal here: there's no exception. Not rape, not even if it endangers the mother's life (we HAD therapeutic abortion, it was kind of a grey area but it was allowed... then the right didn't want that and even tried to pass laws that punished abortion even harder).
|
![]() (08-21-2012, 04:07 AM)
|
#67
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:07 AM)
|
#68
The party is already fragmented. You have the Tea Party, Conservatives and Moderate Conservatives. Then again the Dems have the Blue Dogs.
|
|
She Touched Me
Ohhh She Touched Me (08-21-2012, 04:07 AM)
|
#69
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:07 AM)
|
#70
Honest question: how does this differ from their previous election party platforms? The OP's link states:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:09 AM)
|
#73
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:12 AM)
|
#80
Seriously.
Go look up Anencephaly. Not safe for work, or life, and don't look at it if you're feeling sad. The Republican Party would now force every woman with a fetus with that condition to carry the baby to term. It would die within a few hours of being born anyway, if it somehow isn't stillborn. The end result is the same, all they care about is that the woman is forced to pass a dead human out of their vagina. And since they would require a penetrative ultrasound, the woman would be FORCED to know that they'll be giving birth to a dead person in a few months. |
|
Banned
(08-21-2012, 04:12 AM)
|
#81
Great timing, will hopefully push a few fence-sitters away from them.
And this is why, sad though the situation is, the independent vote in a presidential election is both useless and a terrible choice. If you don't vote for the one chance against this, you're basically voting for it. A system that is essentially "Do You Choose X or Y?" has no recognition for your feelings or your principles. |
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:13 AM)
|
#83
We now have a VP pick who believes the same. We now have a Republican House that in 2011 said abortion should only be allowed for forcible rape There are no more Republican moderates in congress. |
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:13 AM)
|
#84
I can't, and wouldn't support such an amendment. |
|
Banned
(08-21-2012, 04:14 AM)
|
#85
There's no way this is true. I would say "unfortunately," but contrary to what public opinion polls suggest, most people aren't really against abortion. They say they are, but when one slips past the goalie in their own life... yup.
But I guess it serves to get GAF's blood boiling. |
|
Banned
(08-21-2012, 04:15 AM)
|
#87
Republicans never win debates on abortion. They tried it earlier this year and lost big time, and now this Akin situation PLUS the platform is just icing on the cake. To make matters worse for them, Paul Ryan has co-sponsored bills that redefine rape in lieu of abortion. Amazing stuff.
This should be an easy election to win, but they're pissing it away by assuming the bad economy will make people put up with all their crazy shit. |
|
Aliens made this post
(08-21-2012, 04:16 AM)
|
#88
|
|
formerly zmoney
(08-21-2012, 04:16 AM)
|
#89
Who protects the choice of the unborn child? Doesn't that child have the right to live a full and happy life if he poses no danger to the mother? |
|
underwear police
(08-21-2012, 04:17 AM)
|
#91
|
|
que?
(08-21-2012, 04:17 AM)
|
#92
And, are you not familiar with the GOPs stance on abortion? They've always pushed to overturn RvW.
If society wants to make abortion illegal, society has to do it's part to 100% take care of the child until adulthood. Ya know,for the safety of the child.
Last edited by Veezy; 08-21-2012 at 04:20 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:18 AM)
|
#93
As an non US citizen I don't know whether to laugh at the absurdity of the proposal and apparent lack of science behind it or feel bad for women most of whom don't see eye to eye with this kind of political sentiment.
What happens when the republicans win during the next term? Worse yet, what if Obama administration that only bares fangs for the sake of winning majority during the election and at other times more often than not espouses republican ideologies anyway allow this bill to be passed under a different name? |
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:18 AM)
|
#94
Also, that unborn child is not a person and has no rights. |
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:19 AM)
|
#96
I think calling it a "child" is a bit disingenuous and appeals more to emotion than logic.
|
|
Member
(08-21-2012, 04:20 AM)
|
#98
This is also bad for men. If a woman gets pregnant and wants to abort, she no longer has the option. Who gets saddled with paying for the child? Well the father will be, with no recourse.
More financial shackles being imposed by the party that's supposed to be against them. |
|
Banned
(08-21-2012, 04:20 AM)
|
#99
Cuz children are just like parasites. Or cancer.
And saying you want RvW overturned is much different than saying you want a constitutional amendment stating when life begins. WAY different. |