wsippel
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)
#101

Still don't believe the "enhanced Broadway" part. The 750 roadmap ended years ago, IBM had no plans to ever implement SMP or shrink it beyond 90nm. If it's close enough to be mistaken for an "enhanced Broadway", it's probably a 470S with the defining Gekko/ Broadway features bolted on (L1d locking, write gather pipe).
Basileus777
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

Basileus777's Avatar
#102

The rest of the specs are pretty much what's been expected, but using Broadways in a 2012 console is just....I don't get it. Is backwards compatibility really worth it at this point?
fluffydelusions
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

fluffydelusions's Avatar
#103

If these specs are correct this will basically put it in line (generally) with current gen consoles and then when PS4/720 come out this thing will be obsolete and get down ports like PS2 was getting current gen sports games for a while.
Relaxed Muscle
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

Relaxed Muscle's Avatar
#104

Quote:
CPU: “Espresso” CPU on the Wii U has three enhanced Broadway cores
Wii U is the equivalent of three Wii duct tapped together.

Seriously though...three enhanced Broadway cores?...isn't this...bad?
x-Lundz-x
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

x-Lundz-x's Avatar
#105

Sounds strong enough to play next gen Mario in HD. Can't wait!
zerokoolpsx
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

zerokoolpsx's Avatar
#106

Three enhanced Broadway cores? The same one from the Wii, but unenhanced? So three Wii cpu's duct taped together?
8gb storage. No DD future unless you're planning to use all 4 usb ports.
32MB for the OS is kinda small.
Karsticles
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

Karsticles's Avatar
#107

Wasn't the Wii U thread speculating more toward the 1.5-2GB range for RAM?

Originally Posted by zerokoolpsx: View Post
Three enhanced Broadway cores? The same one from the Wii, but unenhanced? So three Wii cpu's duct taped together?
8gb storage. No DD future unless you're planning to use all 4 usb ports.
32MB for the OS is kinda small.
We knew the storage would be small. That's just how Nintendo runs. Why would you need to use all 4 USB ports for DD? You can just swap cards. I have so many USB devices, they might finally have a purpose!

The "three Wii CPUs duct taped together" statement is funny, since people say the Wii is 2 Gamecube's duct taped together. If this logic continues, the Wii U's successor will be 4 Wii U's duct taped together, which is pretty impressive!
Sethos
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:47 PM)

Sethos's Avatar
#108

To put the performance questions to rest, I made this easy to understand chart.

FyreWulff
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:48 PM)

FyreWulff's Avatar
#109

Originally Posted by McLovin: View Post
That base model isn't designed with xbla in mind. When I had my 60gb ps3 and I filled it up I just stopped buying games until I was fully finished with the games I had. I couldn't even buy retail games that required an install for a while. They should swallow the cost and put something bigger in there.
Then they should stop calling it the Arcade model. XBLA games are capped at 2GB anyways. Any cross-platform game that's on XBLA won't be bigger than 2GB.

We need more space, but I'm fairly sure they've done the market research here and 8GB will be enough for a notable portion of owners. It doesn't make sense to burn money providing space that a significant portion of your users will never use, especially when the power users know how to upgrade anyway and it's flash memory.


Originally Posted by zerokoolpsx: View Post
Three enhanced Broadway cores? The same one from the Wii, but unenhanced? So three Wii cpu's duct taped together?
8gb storage. No DD future unless you're planning to use all 4 usb ports.
32MB for the OS is kinda small.
32MB for the OS versus around 6MB that the 360 dashboard has to play with, sounds about right

edit: and if that's the edram then even better
Last edited by FyreWulff; 09-11-2012 at 02:53 PM.
gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(09-11-2012, 02:48 PM)

gofreak's Avatar
#110

What's doubly worse about the CPU is...iirc, it's supposedly not clocked particularly high either?


Originally Posted by wsippel: View Post
Still don't believe the "enhanced Broadway" part. The 750 roadmap ended years ago, IBM had no plans to ever implement SMP or shrink it beyond 90nm.

IBM's own plans are irrelevant. They'll meet whatever a client specifies.
grimshawish
Banned
(09-11-2012, 02:48 PM)
#111

Internal memory sounds like a good amount; am all for BYOM (bring your own memory).
Nibel
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:48 PM)

Nibel's Avatar
#112

Disappointed about the CPU.. but it's just as we expected.

Nintendo won't have problems to create great visuals with such a machine, but I doubt we'll see the big important third-party games that are yet to be announced on Wii U.
tiku
Junior Member
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

tiku's Avatar
#113

Originally Posted by Kyoufu: View Post
1GB RAM for games is perfectly fine. Why would they need more for PS3 level tech? I'd be worried about the OS though if it only has 32MB.
That's edRAM ;)
Sid
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

Sid's Avatar
#114

Originally Posted by EatChildren: View Post
The Wii should have taught everybody that raw specs will not push consoles out the door, and limitations do not prevent market success. Only a niche group of people give a shit about the raw numbers, and that's how it will always be.

As for DX11, you're not going to see that in on a non-Microsoft licensed API.
According to you is the gamepad as revolutionary as motion controls for the wii were back in 2006?

Originally Posted by gofreak: View Post
What's doubly worse about the CPU is...iirc, it's supposedly not clocked particularly high either?
Yeah isn't it supposed to be ~ 2-2.5 GHZ?
MadOdorMachine
No additional functions
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

MadOdorMachine's Avatar
#115

Nintendo should have just released this years ago with a less powerful GPU and Wii motion +.
theDeeDubs
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

theDeeDubs's Avatar
#116

Sounds perfectly reasonable for some HD Mario and Zelda. Strangely getting hyped for this now. Haven't had a Nintendo since the Gamecube.
Horse Armour
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)
#117

Originally Posted by gofreak: View Post
What's doubly worse about the CPU is...iirc, it's supposedly not clocked particularly high either?
Last rumour was 1.6GHZ.
ThoseDeafMutes
Became a moderator just to tag himself.
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

ThoseDeafMutes's Avatar
#118

Originally Posted by royalan: View Post
...They're still using Broadway?

...No DirectX 11 support?

...1GB RAM?


Wow, I guess Nintendo's really counting on hype to sell this thing...

Dead serious question for you. Did you see anything at E3 that made any of these specs seem too low? What exactly were you expecting them to be, based on what we'd seen about it?

Their strategy is far more complicated than "hype". They have first mover advantage for the next round of consoles, and they have the Tablet Controller as a distinguishing feature. It's not very likely to "fail", even if it doesn't succeed to the same level that the Wii or DS did. Wii, DS and 3DS have shown that you don't necessarily need to compete graphically in order to succeed, as long as you can make up some consumer appeal in other areas. To write them off solely based on technical specifications given recent history is extremely naive.
Azure J
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:49 PM)

Azure J's Avatar
#119

Originally Posted by Karsticles: View Post
Wasn't the Wii U thread speculating more toward the 1.5-2GB range for RAM?
The consensus was (myself included) that there's more (leaning towards 2) but Nintendo opted to give a clean chunk of 1GB to devs for first round development as they optimized their OS (which is rumored to have 512MB to itself[!!]). However, as will all things, take it with your best grain of Nintendo specific salt.
Dark FaZe
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Dark FaZe's Avatar
#120

Originally Posted by Graphics Horse: View Post
Because they're not in it, they've made public statements exempting themselves. But they may have the best console GPU and memory on the market for a while, if you like that sort of thing.
Who's going to take advantage of the specs? Hard to imagine third parties will, and if NSMB U and Pikmin are anything to go by the 1st party devs themselves aren't that worried about it.
Visualante2
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Visualante2's Avatar
#121

The whole discussion about internal storage hinges on the assumption that Nintendo's market place will serve up sizeable content regularly. I think people who are talking about hooking up external hard drives are going to be quite disappointed. Chances are an SD HC card will be more than satisfactory and a more elegant solution under your TV.
Sho_Nuff82
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Sho_Nuff82's Avatar
#122

Originally Posted by Anth0ny: View Post
Yup, gonna need dbz comparisons.

Or at least past console comparisons.
The Wii U is Nappa, the 360 is Picollo in the Saiyan saga. Wii U has more raw power, but is not so quick-witted, so it gets slapped around a bit early on. In the end, brute force wins out, and the 360 will die first.

Edit: Third party DLC and DD games are probably the biggest reason to invest in an external HDD.
royalan
Lotus Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

royalan's Avatar
#123

Originally Posted by EatChildren: View Post
The Wii should have taught everybody that raw specs will not push consoles out the door, and limitations do not prevent market success. Only a niche group of people give a shit about the raw numbers, and that's how it will always be.

As for DX11, you're not going to see that in on a non-Microsoft licensed API.
I agree. It's just that the Wii U is so far missing that rabid hype component that sold the Wii. Eh, this isn't the thread to have that debate.

These specs just don't seem to be all that forward-thinking.
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Black_Stride's Avatar
#124

Originally Posted by Sid: View Post
What hype?
You havent noticed any WiiU hype?
Basileus777
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Basileus777's Avatar
#125

Originally Posted by Sethos: View Post
To put the performance questions to rest, I made this easy to understand chart.
These charts were be a lot more useful if they were labeled. What is each axis representing?
Graphics Horse
graphics horse
graphics horse
does whatever a
graphics horse does
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Graphics Horse's Avatar
#126

Originally Posted by Dark FaZe: View Post
Who's going to take advantage of the specs? Hard to imagine third parties will, and if NSMB U and Pikmin are anything to go by the 1st party devs themselves aren't that worried about it.
It's not about the games!
gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

gofreak's Avatar
#127

Originally Posted by Horse Armour: View Post
Last rumour was 1.6GHZ.
I was thinking of suggesting a doubling of clockspeed over the Wii...but I thought it would seem trollish.

Good job Nintendo, if true!
Strife91
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

Strife91's Avatar
#128

They better replace the Wii U after 4-5 years....
EloquentM
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:50 PM)

EloquentM's Avatar
#129

Originally Posted by Kyoufu: View Post
1GB RAM for games is perfectly fine. Why would they need more for PS3 level tech? I'd be worried about the OS though if it only has 32MB.
32MB of eDRAM is not for the OS. most likely it'll be used as a frame buffer.
BGBW
Maturity, bitches.
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

BGBW's Avatar
#130

Originally Posted by MadOdorMachine: View Post
Nintendo should have just released this years ago with a less powerful GPU and Wii motion +.
Even better. They should have released this in 1981 with Donkey Kong Arcade HD version.
EatChildren
Will Suck Cock While GDGF Watches
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

EatChildren's Avatar
#131

Originally Posted by Sid: View Post
According to you is the gamepad as revolutionary as motion controls for the wii were back in 2006?
Not really, but I've made a point to not bother trying to predict the success and failures of Nintendo because I simply cant. The company and their strategy, and the success of said strategy, is too unpredictable.

My point was simply that number crunching does not push consoles into mass market success. Tech heads would like to think it does, but it doesn't. Such is life.
Feature
Banned
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

Feature's Avatar
#132

wow what a disappointment if true (unless it costs 200€ max).
Sid
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

Sid's Avatar
#133

Originally Posted by tiku: View Post
That's edRAM ;)
So the OS will take a share of the 1 GB RAM?
onQ123
Junior Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

onQ123's Avatar
#134

I think it's time to dig up some old post where I told people about the Wii U CPU being 3 overclocked Wii CPUs & they all said I was crazy.
jokkir
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

jokkir's Avatar
#135

I think the real question is when will they unlock the hidden cpu core to make it have unlimited power?
Ydahs
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

Ydahs's Avatar
#136

Originally Posted by Relaxed Muscle: View Post
Wii U is the equivalent of three Wii duct tapped together.

Seriously though...three enhanced Broadway cores?...isn't this...bad?
Not really since we have absolutely no idea what it actually means. As wsippel mentioned, it may be a more modern CPU with some distinct Broadway functionalities, added to support BC.
Karsticles
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

Karsticles's Avatar
#137

Originally Posted by AzureJericho: View Post
The consensus was (myself included) that there's more (leaning towards 2) but Nintendo opted to give a clean chunk of 1GB to devs for first round development. However, as will all things, take it with your best grain of Nintendo specific salt.
Right, like 1GB for developers, 1GB for background processing, right? I'm just confused as to why these specs don't list something similar.
Alextended
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:51 PM)

Alextended's Avatar
#138

Originally Posted by Nibel: View Post
Disappointed about the CPU.. but it's just as we expected.
So how fast is it?

Originally Posted by Feature: View Post
wow what a disappointment if true (unless it costs 200€ max).
So how powerful is it?

Hint: you have no clue so I'm wondering why the disappointment already. Unless that'd be your response no matter what.
Last edited by Alextended; 09-11-2012 at 02:55 PM.
Canis lupus
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Canis lupus's Avatar
#139

Originally Posted by MadOdorMachine: View Post
Nintendo should have just released this years ago with a less powerful GPU and Wii motion +.
But the Wii was selling awesome back then.
Busty
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)
#140

Originally Posted by Black_Stride: View Post
You havent noticed any WiiU hype?
Nope. None.

And outside of the hardcore Nintendo crowd there doesn't seem to be any heat for it here on GAF either.
Plinko
Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Plinko's Avatar
#141

Clearly made with a low price point in mind.

I'm now leaning toward $199 or $249.
Ricker
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Ricker's Avatar
#142

No 4k support?...I'm out ;) lol

Seriously,we should find out on the 13th I guess...
Wolves Evolve
Just visiting Planet Fuck
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Wolves Evolve's Avatar
#143

Could someone explain what the significance of the eDRAM is?
Interfectum
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Interfectum's Avatar
#144

Quote:
CPU: Broadway cores

GPU: DirectX 10.1

Memory: 1GB
tkscz
Banned
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)
#145

Well at the very least we can see what OpenGL 3.3 (DX 10.1) really has to offer. It died so quickly, no one got to use it. DX9 still get's more use than 10.

As for that CPU, as long as it has better cache and bus it's fine. The WiiU has so many other components taking the stress off of it. Also, broadway was a damned good CPU, very stable, and could stand on it's own. Just it was single cored and didn't have too much cache or wide enough bus compared to the 360 and PS3.
ShineALight
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

ShineALight's Avatar
#146

Originally Posted by Visualante2: View Post
The whole discussion about internal storage hinges on the assumption that Nintendo's market place will serve up sizeable content regularly. I think people who are talking about hooking up external hard drives are going to be quite disappointed. Chances are an SD HC card will be more than satisfactory and a more elegant solution under your TV.
Hadn't it been confirmed that, as with 3DS, Nintendo wants to offer retail games as downloadable?
wsippel
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)
#147

Originally Posted by gofreak: View Post
IBM's own plans are irrelevant. They'll meet whatever a client specifies.
That's not entirely true.
Nibel
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:52 PM)

Nibel's Avatar
#148

Originally Posted by Alextended: View Post
So how fast is it?'

So how powerful is it?
Sonic fast

Captain Falcon powerful
frankie_baby
Member
(09-11-2012, 02:53 PM)
#149

Hasn't there been some info from someone on here that clock for clock Broadway is actually far better than the cores in xenon and cell?
Triple U
Banned
(09-11-2012, 02:53 PM)

Triple U's Avatar
#150

Originally Posted by EatChildren: View Post
The Wii should have taught everybody that raw specs will not push consoles out the door, and limitations do not prevent market success. Only a niche group of people give a shit about the raw numbers, and that's how it will always be.

As for DX11, you're not going to see that in on a non-Microsoft licensed API.
It speaks to the feature set of the GPU though. Im pretty sure both the next Xbox and PS4 GPU's will be DX11 compliant.