|
Member
(10-09-2012, 11:19 PM)
|
Future Publishing (Edge/PC Gamer/etc) freelance writer says they alter reviews, more
#1
https://twitter.com/RichStanton
starts 4 hours ago. yes, twitter dot com. don't like it? great thanks for letting us know
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Visualante2; 10-09-2012 at 11:50 PM.
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
(10-09-2012, 11:43 PM)
|
#5
What a very bitter chap. This is the guy who was (understandably) a bit pissed off last week when CVG publically criticised one of his reviews but now it seems he just wants to burn his bridges. I wonder how long he was with Future - if they were so bad you'd think he would have left earlier and wouldn't have kept writing freelance articles for them. Just sounds like a butthurt journalist to me, I'd never heard of him until last week TBH.
|
|
(10-09-2012, 11:50 PM)
|
#12
So what's the background on this?
What happened between this Rich and Future? |
|
Member
(10-09-2012, 11:56 PM)
|
#15
http://bootofjustice.wordpress.com/2...hy-i-hate-cvg/ |
|
El Fabio Speaks Wu-Tang
(10-10-2012, 12:06 AM)
|
#19
Fucking reading Twiiter quotes, outside of twitter, is confusing as hell sometimes, fuck my brain. On topic, is this the new trend in the gaming industry now? Burning bridges and all, I mean, fuck, didn't some dude from SONY PR department did the same thing?
|
|
go home you're drunk
(10-10-2012, 12:09 AM)
|
#24
Do the people that buy the GTA/Halo/COD games really go to site or a mag like Edge to see review scores before they buy the games?
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#25
Wow, now he's directly implying that someone from ONM tried to use the magazine to go out with teenage girls.
Originally Posted by Chris Scullion:
Originally Posted by Rich Stanton:
Originally Posted by Chris Scullion:
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:15 AM)
|
#29
CoD 2 - 7 BO - 7 MW3 - 9 MW2 - 9 |
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:15 AM)
|
#30
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#32
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#33
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#34
It's the community that made me stop, not the game itself. |
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:19 AM)
|
#35
|
|
A Good Citizen
(10-10-2012, 12:22 AM)
|
#39
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Ascending the eternal
spiritual elevator (10-10-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#41
Quote:
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#42
Quote:
Quote:
What EA actually said
Quote:
There was actually a thread about this and people were arguing that CV&G didn't misquote what EA said. |
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#43
Quote:
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:24 AM)
|
#44
It's kind of hard to side with a guy who sounds like a total dick.
Not that I don't believe at least partly what he's says (I've got quite a few own stories to share about the relationship between publishers and the press...), but he's not a person I want to relate to. Also, good luck finding new jobs. |
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:25 AM)
|
#45
People need to read and comprehend that it's never implied that Rockstar paid for reviews. He says that scores were changed from final edit to publication, and that Rockstar's PR is heavy-handed. He also said at one point that Future is pretty hands-off with EDGE in general. From my experience doing some work for EDGE, that seems to be true.
|
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:26 AM)
|
#48
(seriously I think score inflation is a big problem--having your game review as an 8 is bad, bad, bad, which means your game can't just be good, it has to be amazing, which leads to tons of pressure.) I don't know that they outright paid for reviews, but I can easily see RS strong-arming publications that fail to be appropriately blown away by their latest. |
|
Member
(10-10-2012, 12:26 AM)
|
#49
It's a misquote, but it's not inaccurate in it's sentiment. 'Scary' and 'comfortable' are essentially the same thing in that context. If people find the game uncomfortable to play solo, and that turns them off the franchise, you can call it as scary as you like, but doing something to directly counteract that fear is making it less scary.
|