|
Member
(10-25-2012, 03:54 PM)
|
#501
Sadly, you know it's going to go over the line. And then instead of simply having to defend against legitimate criticisms, she'll be dealing with the wave of misogynist trolls who always come out for these things.
|
|
|
|
go home you're drunk
(10-25-2012, 03:58 PM)
|
#505
Didn't have a problem with the pic at first until I noticed the Halo 4 ad. Its fine having Doritos and Dew sponsor because the subject and the topic that the journalist is discussing is not about food snacks, its about games and that's where the H4 ad doesn't look good.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 03:59 PM)
|
#506
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 03:59 PM)
|
#507
stuart campbell just retweeted this
Quote:
i wonder how long she was working freelance for square-enix. did it go back to 2010 and beyond? |
|
Junior Member
(10-25-2012, 04:00 PM)
|
#509
|
|
(10-25-2012, 04:01 PM)
|
#511
He also posted a list of people who used the hashtag to win the PS3
http://storify.com/andybeta/gmadefiance |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:03 PM)
|
#514
|
|
lapdance transform pants
(10-25-2012, 04:05 PM)
|
#516
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:05 PM)
|
#517
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:05 PM)
|
#518
I wonder how well gaming journalism would be fair if everything shifted to anonymity? We wouldn't have to deal with gender, or past history of a singular writer, and at the same time a reviewer would be protected for speaking their honest opinion. I mean sure, it would backfire like everything tends to, but if someone could honestly review and scrutinize a game as much as possible without fear of backlash from a community or company, wouldn't that criticism help the development of both the games and the games industry?
Or do people just like attention too much that they want their name written on every article? |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:06 PM)
|
#519
While we're on the topic of games journalism, this just popped up on the EuroGamer twitter feed:
Quote:
Except... the story is no longer on the site, seemingly pulled without reason. Edit: It's been reposted: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/20...ve-to-15-hours |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:07 PM)
|
#521
You could reasonably predict someone would post a picture with some disparaging commentary. At least to the original poster's credit, it was tame disparaging commentary. No one need try to up it. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:07 PM)
|
#522
I've seen 'journos' circle the wagons, not own up to being called out, refuse to see multiple sides of an issue, and circlejerk one another far too often on Twitter (I am on Twitter too much, in other news) to honestly get riled up about Keighley and Doritos.
On another note, I'm now very curious about UK libel laws. Seems ridiculous. And yeah, personal attacks on Wainright are not cool despite her behavior otherwise. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:10 PM)
|
#523
I love how the situation was exacerbated by Wainwright's own actions. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:10 PM)
|
#524
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:11 PM)
|
#527
If I understand this correctly, Eurogamer was not threatened with legal action, rather they were merely asked to remove the "offending" comment? Are we to assume it was done as a favor rather than a response to a legal threat?
That just sounds so much worse than the alternative.... |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:11 PM)
|
#528
|
|
has an official NeoGAF
license to hit you on the head with a skillet (10-25-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#530
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#531
I am starting to wonder if EG made the changes due to the *potential* of a libel lawsuit rather than because anyone actually threatened it directly or otherwise. Not sure how I feel about that. Either way, it's a chilling effect. |
|
Junior Member
(10-25-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#532
That list should go even further and have the site/mag they work for next to the name.
Edit: Hmm, give me a few minutes
Last edited by CambriaRising; 10-25-2012 at 04:16 PM.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:14 PM)
|
#533
The difference in that case is that Giant Bomb never claimed to be journalists or serious writers. It's a fan site nothing less nothing more. The main draw of the entire website is their podcast and video content.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:14 PM)
|
#534
If Lauren just came out and said that she worked for Square-Enix and that while she is a giant TR fan that maybe her words should be taken with a grain of salt no one would care about this whole mess. Well, some would, but those people think the world is perfect. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:14 PM)
|
#535
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:14 PM)
|
#536
And by 'fine line' I mean a big fucking difference. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:15 PM)
|
#537
This is just hilarious to me. This shit has been going on for so long, its not a new phenomenon whatsoever.
The reality is there's no way of stopping it. Games "journalism" (which has always been a stretch, but never mind) is an industry based on opinions not facts. The bar is set really low which is why the incompetents, cynics, and shills are so numerous. You want to get a more favourable opinion for your product (and lets face it, who wouldn't) you are extra "nice" in some way to the hacks. Is paying them somehow worse than sucking up to them and making them feel "special" so you get a few extra points? Junkets, goodie-bags, special access visits, etc... is anyone honestly going to say these things are provided to further the cultural "truth", rather than the bleeding obvious which is to shape opinions in a favourable manner? This happens with every form of media, and because a pissed-off journo is potentially harmful to your profits its always going to happen. |
|
Junior Member
(10-25-2012, 04:15 PM)
|
#538
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:15 PM)
|
#539
The focus has now turned to Lauren Wainwright and her integrity which is a shame as the editorial point about journalists and PRs being too friendly is still a good one to explore.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:16 PM)
|
#540
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:16 PM)
|
#541
|
|
The beavers have won.
America has fallen. (10-25-2012, 04:17 PM)
|
#542
|
|
Banned
(10-25-2012, 04:17 PM)
|
#543
Also funny how they don't review Dance Central 3 because it's a bad game, but felt fine giving great scores to DC1 and 2. Why? Because their friends work at Harmonix who are currently dieing right now. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:17 PM)
|
#544
But there is no need for the insult in the first place.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:17 PM)
|
#545
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:17 PM)
|
#546
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:18 PM)
|
#547
Longtime Chicago Tribune reporter Sam Smith was hired to write the Chicago Bulls team blog a few years ago. But he was hardly angling for the job. Smith is best known for writing "The Jordan Rules," which is a fairly critical book about the early years of Jordan's career.
|
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:18 PM)
|
#548
So is the problem that this Laura Wainwright character is a shill, or that someone called her out for being a shill?
Because it sounds like the latter is a bigger deal than the former in the clubby game journo world. This makes total sense, not to make it political, but you clearly see this same dynamic amongst crooks in government, finance, etc. the problem isn't that guy X is a crook, it's that people calling him a crook are besmirching his good name. |
|
Member
(10-25-2012, 04:19 PM)
|
#550
|