• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF

gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(11-01-2012, 07:20 PM)
gofreak's Avatar

Originally Posted by thuway

This will be a seriously weak system if that's the case.

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.
DieH@rd
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:20 PM)
DieH@rd's Avatar

Originally Posted by mrmarioman

1080p@60fps and 3D? That would be nice. I thought hdmi was limited to 24frames at 1080p 3D

Current hdmi limit [version 1.4a] for 1080p is 60hz. 4K [4096×2160] is limited to 24hz.
BlankaBR
Banned
(11-01-2012, 07:21 PM)
8 to 16 gb ram???
Nirolak
Mrgrgr
(11-01-2012, 07:21 PM)
Nirolak's Avatar

Originally Posted by DragonSworne

8Gb = 1GB

There are 8 bits in one byte.

If these specs are true, this is around WiiU level.

Given they wrote 256 Gb for the hard drive, I think it's pretty clear what they meant.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:21 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by gofreak

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.

FUCK THAT SHIT. In terms of raw output it sounds like a 7660 with a standard AMD CPU. PS3.5 in every single sense.

I'm going with MS if that's the case.
Heavy
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:22 PM)
Heavy's Avatar

Originally Posted by gofreak

I don't see much point in going with an APU in the final machine if you're going to have a discrete GPU.

If the final target is an APU, an A10 in the current kit makes sense since it's the best APU available right now. A discrete GPU in the kit might make sense to better approximate performance of a final APU with greater GPU resources than an A10, but otherwise I wouldn't expect to be hearing about discrete GPUs.

That would really suck.

Originally Posted by gofreak

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.

I thought APU alone is not that powerful? even future APUs
-Pyromaniac-
(11-01-2012, 07:22 PM)
-Pyromaniac-'s Avatar

Originally Posted by BlankaBR

8 to 16 gb ram???

For the devkit. Which likely means a 4GB target minimum. Which is pretty great still.

Originally Posted by gofreak

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.

I sense you repeating this many times in this thread for people.
Dark-Cloudz
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:22 PM)
Dark-Cloudz's Avatar
Brace yourself for this again then.


EDIT: I'll still buy day one...
Nirolak
Mrgrgr
(11-01-2012, 07:23 PM)
Nirolak's Avatar

Originally Posted by -Pyromaniac-

For the devkit. Which likely means a 4GB target minimum. Which is pretty great still.

That would imply a 4-8 GB range if we assume doubling.

Probably depends on what Microsoft does since having less RAM is a nightmare for quality ports.

Since it's assuredly at least partially DDR3, the cost shouldn't be especially different.
SolarPowered
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:23 PM)
SolarPowered's Avatar

There are to be four versions of the dev kit, we were told. A previous version was essentially just a graphics card. The version shipping now is a “modified PC,” and the third version, appearing in January, will be close to final spec. A final version will be delivered to developers “next summer”.

The “ultimate goal” for the hardware, we were told, is for it to be able to run 1080p60 games in 3D with “no problem,” to create a machine that’s powerful enough for “today and tomorrow’s market”.

The dev kits have “either 8Gb or 16Gb of RAM. Deduce from that what you will.”

When asked if PS4 will have an optical drive, specifically Blu-ray, our source responded: “Of course it has.”We’ve been told the hard drive will be 256Gb “as standard,” but it’s not clear if it’ll be a normal HDD or a solid state drive.

We were told that Sony’s aim with Orbis is to avoid problems involved in launching PS3 by creating something “very affordable” but that “isn’t a slouch”.

The machine has WiFi and Ethernet connectivity and HDMI out. Our source said the was “no difference” between PlayStation 3 and Orbis input/output.

The UI, however, has been revamped. It was said today that players will now be able to press the PS button mid-game and travel “anywhere” on the system. An example given was buying DLC from the PS Store mid-game then seamlessly returning to play.

“They’re trying to make it as fluid as possible,” our source said.

We were also told that the machine will be designed to accept system and product updates in the background, and that it’ll “always be standby mode”. When you set the console up, we were told, you’ll be asked if you want to allow background downloads. You can, of course, disallow them.

No details have been given on the pad as yet. Confirmation is expected this month.

Orbis is expected to be announced at an event “just before E3″ next year.
http://www.vg247.com/2012/11/01/ps4_...playstation_4/

This is how you do it.

Originally Posted by Seda

What's the equivalent DBZ power level?

Fat Buu
KageMaru
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:24 PM)
KageMaru's Avatar
The RAM quotes look like an improvement over past rumors. I wonder if they changed the type of RAM they plan to use.

This rumor makes it seem like they are planning on just using an APU while older rumors indicated a APU + discrete GPU set up. Hopefully it's still the latter and not the former.
Sipowicz
Banned
(11-01-2012, 07:24 PM)

Originally Posted by GANGSTERKILLER

Good for you. I have a massive PS2 library and used to play them on my 60 GB launch PS3 until it died on me.

And this is why a custom firmware is interesting. Forced backward compatibilty.

the irony of this is that most of the games he plays are probably sub hd. his and (i'd imagine many other people's) "standards" are defined by coporations

the streaming solution someone mentioned is very interesting though. a library of ps1, ps2, psp and vita games at my disposal on one system would be magic. i'd gladly pay a netflix-esque monthly fee for the privelage
carfo
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:24 PM)
carfo's Avatar

The dev kits have “either 8Gb or 16Gb of RAM. Deduce from that what you will.”

hmm...hoping final has 16gb but even 8 is not bad
gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
gofreak's Avatar

Originally Posted by thuway

In terms of raw output it sounds like a 7660 with a standard AMD CPU.

The 18-CU config of the previous rumour I'm referring to would be more like a 7850+

I would not be hopeful of much more than that from either Sony or MS at this stage.


Originally Posted by Heavy

That would really suck.


I thought APU alone is not that powerful? even future APUs

These APUs will be whatever config the client wants. The market AMD targets in the desktop space with their APU products is another matter.
Aizu_Itsuko
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
Aizu_Itsuko's Avatar

Originally Posted by DragonSworne

8Gb = 1GB

There are 8 bits in one byte.

If these specs are true, this is around WiiU level.

No, no... if the devkit has 1GB, then the PS4 probably has less than that.

PS4 = 512MB RAM (part of it reserved for the new OS, so it has less memory available than the PS3).


(Note: Most people writing these articles don't know the difference between GB and Gb, they are just reporting what someone else told them.)
Violater
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
Violater's Avatar
How many jobs will I need in this economy?
AranhaHunter
Banned
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)

Originally Posted by OldJadedGamer

cross game chat is only supported on Vita on a game by game basis

Is this true? Pretty lame if so.

I guess some games force you to be offline on Vita so you can't even use psn features then....
earvcunanan
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
earvcunanan's Avatar
A 4GB target minimum of RAM for a console would be great.
gundamkyoukai
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
gundamkyoukai's Avatar

Originally Posted by gofreak

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.

Gofreak you remember that last rumor when came to the APU .
Canis lupus
Junior Member
(11-01-2012, 07:25 PM)
Canis lupus's Avatar
Isn't anyone else really hyped at this "standby" mode? I hate turning on my console, it takes too long. Thats why I leave my pc always in sleep mode, instant resume.
-Pyromaniac-
(11-01-2012, 07:26 PM)
-Pyromaniac-'s Avatar

Originally Posted by Nirolak

That would imply a 4-8 GB range if we assume doubling.

Probably depends on what Microsoft does since having less RAM is a nightmare for quality ports.

Since it's assuredly at least partially DDR3, the cost shouldn't be especially different.

How long can Sony wait to decide this though? Unless they have intel on what the Durango will have in its final form.

I have this feeling that we'll see nearly identical hardware launching from both companies at nearly identical prices (though MS will obviously offer some value modelling of some sort).

Originally Posted by TurkishEmperor

Isn't anyone else really hyped at this "standby" mode? I hate turning on my console, it takes too long. Thats why I leave my pc always in sleep mode, instant resume.

I mentioned it a page ago!
cyberheater
PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
(11-01-2012, 07:27 PM)
cyberheater's Avatar

Originally Posted by FlashFlooder

If it ain't PS3 compatible, I ain't buying.

You ain't buying then.

The spec sounds good. Looking forward to hearing more.
Azzurri
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:27 PM)
Azzurri's Avatar

Originally Posted by Eideka

Very good specs.

Hopefully Sony does not disappoint.

Only $699!!!!
Madridy
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:28 PM)
Madridy's Avatar
I really hope the PS4 will be SSD compatible Hardware (SATAIII 6GB/s) and Software (optimized OS) wise, so we can add an SSD down the line when they become more affordable.
gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(11-01-2012, 07:28 PM)
gofreak's Avatar

Originally Posted by gundamkyoukai

Gofreak you remember that last rumor when came to the APU .

The last rumour was also APU only. Just unfortunate mangling of the report in the thread title led some people to believe it meant an additional GPU also.
Yopis
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:29 PM)
Yopis's Avatar

Originally Posted by SatelliteOfLove

Yeah, really. Ain't Sony the only one whose consoles were still manufactured at home?


Thought 15 blade ps3 60gb were made in japan. 18 blade were the chinese built ones. ( assembled in China)
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:29 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by gofreak

The last rumour was also APU only. Just unfortunate mangling of the report in the thread title led some people to believe it meant an additional GPU also.

Honestly all the rumours have been all over the place. I am really hoping there is a ton of oomph to this console and they go with Sea Islands as opposed to Southern Islands.
Nirolak
Mrgrgr
(11-01-2012, 07:30 PM)
Nirolak's Avatar

Originally Posted by -Pyromaniac-

How long can Sony wait to decide this though? Unless they have intel on what the Durango will have in its final form.

I have this feeling that we'll see nearly identical hardware launching from both companies at nearly identical prices (though MS will obviously offer some value modelling of some sort).

For RAM they can wait pretty longer given the amount of games that are likely to be cross generation.

I'd suspect they would decide by the January kit based on what they can get from developers about Microsoft.

But yeah, given that AMD is making both GPUs, they're probably using something that's almost exactly the same product, with the CPUs being the main difference.
Canis lupus
Junior Member
(11-01-2012, 07:30 PM)
Canis lupus's Avatar
I wonder if next gen PSN games will be just DL and play without installing. I wonder why it is like that on XBL and instal required on PSN.
dr_rus
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:30 PM)
dr_rus's Avatar

Originally Posted by gofreak

Why does it matter where GPU resources are located (on a discrete card or on an APU) as long as there's enough of them?

How much GPU resources there are is what matters, not this apparent obsession with whether there's a discrete GPU or not. If it's an APU like in the last rumour it'll be fine IMO.

There is no such thing as "enough of GPU resources". External GPU can have more transistors dedicated to graphics and it can have it's own memory controller and memory pool giving it more bandwidth with less stalls. Going with APU only makes sense if your primary target is cost of production. But you will get an underpowered system that way. The thing is it looks like all major console market players are going for cost of production this time around. I'll go upgrade my PC.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:31 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by dr_rus

There is no such thing as "enough of GPU resources". External GPU can have more transistors dedicated to graphics and it can have it's own memory controller and memory pool giving it more bandwidth with less stalls. Going with APU only makes sense if your primary target is cost of production. But you will get an underpowered system that way. The thing is it looks like all major console market players are going for cost of production this time around. I'll go upgrade my PC.

Truth. There is zero way I want to play a game like Star Wars 1313 @ 720p. We have waited too long.
dr_rus
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:32 PM)
dr_rus's Avatar

Originally Posted by thuway

Honestly all the rumours have been all over the place. I am really hoping there is a ton of oomph to this console and they go with Sea Islands as opposed to Southern Islands.

Sea Islands won't be much different from Southern Islands. Probably even less so than Northern Islands was to Evegreen.
charsace
Accidental Member
(11-01-2012, 07:32 PM)
charsace's Avatar
No mention of a GPU? they could have at least mentioned whether or not there is a GPU in the system or if its only an APU.
gundamkyoukai
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:33 PM)
gundamkyoukai's Avatar

Originally Posted by KageMaru

The RAM quotes look like an improvement over past rumors. I wonder if they changed the type of RAM they plan to use.

This rumor makes it seem like they are planning on just using an APU while older rumors indicated a APU + discrete GPU set up. Hopefully it's still the latter and not the former.

You know the tech geek in me would love if they did not have a discrete GPU.
Let them use all of there silicon budget for a monster APU to see what they can do cause you never going to get that freedom in a PC compare to console .


Looking at desktop APU can give you a idea but there allot they can do to change things up .
Last edited by gundamkyoukai; 11-01-2012 at 07:38 PM.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:33 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by charsace

No mention of a GPU? they could have at least mentioned whether or not there is a GPU in the system or if its only an APU.

This. Going with Tahiti + an APU would be so sex.
toleoring
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:34 PM)
toleoring's Avatar

This 1080P@60fps with 3D?? I'm all for it!

or even this:

I'll be happy~
Zekra Dezivad
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:35 PM)

Originally Posted by FlashFlooder

If it ain't PS3 compatible, I ain't buying.

If you want PS3 games, just buy a PS3. Cheaper and without compatibility problems.
DieH@rd
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:35 PM)
DieH@rd's Avatar

Originally Posted by AranhaHunter

How many PS3s duct taped together is this?

Without dedicated gpu... ~8-10
With dedicated gpu.... ~20

Can someone please dig up that devkit shots of Uncharted 3 in ultra large resolution?
gofreak
GAF's Bob Woodward
(11-01-2012, 07:36 PM)
gofreak's Avatar

Originally Posted by dr_rus

There is no such thing as "enough of GPU resources". External GPU can have more transistors dedicated to graphics and it can have it's own memory controller and memory pool giving it more bandwidth with less stalls. Going with APU only makes sense if your primary target is cost of production. But you will get an underpowered system that way. The thing is it looks like all major console market players are going for cost of production this time around. I'll go upgrade my PC.

Of course there's no such thing as 'enough' in that sense, but I meant in a competitive sense. There's a point at which you're competitive and then there's a point of going beyond being competitive at the cost of price. As long as PS4 has 'enough' GPU resources to be competitive with other consoles, it doesn't matter where those resources are.
systemfehler
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:36 PM)
systemfehler's Avatar

Originally Posted by charsace

No mention of a GPU? they could have at least mentioned whether or not there is a GPU in the system or if its only an APU.

With an A10-5800K I doubt there is a second stand-alone GPU. As posted in the PS4 rumours thread:

" A10-5800K has a Northern Island HD 7660D GPU which is able to run COD Modern Warfare 3 at 30-45FPS (no AA/AF, min. details) at full HD without 3D"

So from 2GB in the PS4 rumour we are now at 4-8GB I seriously doubt that aswell. Even with modifications and optimization I don't see the PS4 as a work horse with those specifications. I doubt Sony has the Adrian Newey of chip design among them to upgrad the HD 7660D to something lasting them another 5-7 years.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:36 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by DieH@rd

Without dedicated gpu... ~3-4
With dedicated gpu.... 5~8

Fixed.
waypoetic
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:37 PM)
waypoetic's Avatar
WHAT DOES IT MEAN? JEFF!?

Hell, if i knew i wouldn't know what to do with that info. I'm just interested in the design of the console and the controller.
IcyBlueStrawberry
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:39 PM)
IcyBlueStrawberry's Avatar

Originally Posted by toleoring

This 1080P@60fps with 3D?? I'm all for it!

or even this:



I'll be happy~

I wouldn't expect either of those to run at 120fps in 1080p.
Kagari
Super Mode
(11-01-2012, 07:39 PM)
Kagari's Avatar
At this point, platform parity between multiplatform games is probably more important than b/c. If b/c happens... good. If not... well, I won't be dumping my PS3 any time soon anyway.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:39 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by systemfehler

With an A10-5800K I doubt there is a second stand-alone GPU. As posted in the PS4 rumours thread:

" A10-5800K has a Northern Island HD 7660D GPU which is able to run COD Modern Warfare 3 at 30-45FPS (no AA/AF, min. details) at full HD without 3D"

So from 2GB in the PS4 rumour we are now at 4-8GB I seriously doubt that aswell. Even with modifications and optimization I don't see the PS4 as a work horse with those specifications. I doubt Sony has the Adrian Newey of chip design among them to upgrad the HD 7660D to something lasting them another 5-7 years.

I serously doubt it will be this weak. Sony cannot be this stupid. Microsoft will steam roll them come next-gen if this is the case.
Grinchy
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:40 PM)
Grinchy's Avatar

Originally Posted by earvcunanan

A 4GB target minimum of RAM for a console would be great.

It would, but I am still hoping for 8. Please, Sony, just put 8GB in there.
Shikoro
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:40 PM)
Shikoro's Avatar

Originally Posted by DieH@rd

Without dedicated gpu... ~4-6
With dedicated gpu.... ~13-15

Double fixed. Including efficiency gains.
Pranay_
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:40 PM)
Pranay_'s Avatar

Originally Posted by thuway

I serously doubt it will be this weak. Sony cannot be this stupid. Microsoft will steam roll them come next-gen if this is the case.

Obviously it wont be this weak.
thuway
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:40 PM)
thuway's Avatar

Originally Posted by Grinchy

It would, but I am still hoping for 8. Please, Sony, just put 8GB in there.

Shit isn't the RAM I'm worried about. I am worried the GPU will be anemic and an insane bottleneck.
gundamkyoukai
Member
(11-01-2012, 07:41 PM)
gundamkyoukai's Avatar

Originally Posted by systemfehler

With an A10-5800K I doubt there is a second stand-alone GPU. As posted in the PS4 rumours thread:

" A10-5800K has a Northern Island HD 7660D GPU which is able to run COD Modern Warfare 3 at 30-45FPS (no AA/AF, min. details) at full HD without 3D"

So from 2GB in the PS4 rumour we are now at 4-8GB I seriously doubt that aswell. Even with modifications and optimization I don't see the PS4 as a work horse with those specifications. I doubt Sony has the Adrian Newey of chip design among them to upgrad the HD 7660D to something lasting them another 5-7 years.

Why would you doubt the PS4 having more than 2GB of ram the rumor was there were always try to get more that 2 so i would expect 4 or even more if using cheap ram like the rumor for MS.
Also you really think that the APU for the PS4 would have 7660D in it when they going to customize it .
Last edited by gundamkyoukai; 11-01-2012 at 07:46 PM.

Thread Tools