KojiKnight
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:50 AM)

KojiKnight's Avatar
Wii/PS3/Kinect homebrewer rumor: Durango CPU clocked at 1.6ghz. #1

In reference to a question Marcan got on the Wii U's CPU clock at 1.25ghz...

Originally Posted by Marcan:
If you want more evidence that MHz isn't everything, a little birdie points out that Durango (Xbox 720) is specc'ed to have a 1.6GHz CPU.

Food for thought. (And don't bother asking me who that little birdie is.)
Marcan is one of the key members of failoverflow and a lead hacker in the Wii/Wii U scene. He apparently has some sources in the know, aside from confirming the exact specs of the Wii U himself through hacking means.


Lock if old, I did a quick search and came up with nothing... but the tweet is 14 hours old so I wouldn't be surprised if I missed something.

(edit) Whoops, forgot to put the source. https://twitter.com/marcan42

(edit 2) Some clarification edits.
Last edited by KojiKnight; 12-02-2012 at 05:31 AM.
24FrameDaVinci
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:50 AM)

24FrameDaVinci's Avatar
#2

1.6ghz? What's the clock on the 360?
antonz
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:51 AM)

antonz's Avatar
#3

Originally Posted by 24FrameDaVinci: View Post
1.6ghz? What's the clock on the 360?
3.2ghz.

Marcan is trying to remind people that the WiiU CPU while it could certainly be much more powerful its not all about the clockspeed
Hero of Legend
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:51 AM)

Hero of Legend's Avatar
#4

What's the Mhz of the PS3 and 360's CPU again?

Edit: Answered above.

Ahem...

Why would you make the CPU weaker than your own last console!?

Unless it has more threads or cores or whatnot, but in raw numbers, that to me is unheard of, but I'm no expert so...
Robot Pants
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:51 AM)

Robot Pants's Avatar
#5

Sounds terrible. Right?
JordanLMiller
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:51 AM)

JordanLMiller's Avatar
#6

Originally Posted by 24FrameDaVinci: View Post
1.6ghz? What's the clock on the 360?
Originally Posted by antonz: View Post
3.2ghz
Weaker than 360 confirmed.
zyxwvu4321
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:51 AM)

zyxwvu4321's Avatar
#7

Last gen confirmed.
Alchemy
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

Alchemy's Avatar
#8

Originally Posted by 24FrameDaVinci: View Post
1.6ghz? What's the clock on the 360?
Believe it has three CPUs (each dual core) at 3.2ghz.
Row
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

Row's Avatar
#9

so how many bits is that?
beast786
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

beast786's Avatar
#10

it would be nice to know the number of cores?
deviljho
Banned
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)
#11

netBuff
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

netBuff's Avatar
#12

Worthless information is worthless.
Last edited by netBuff; 12-02-2012 at 02:32 AM.
7Th
Banned
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

7Th's Avatar
#13

It's over, console gaming is finished.
Kyou
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

Kyou's Avatar
#14

so Nextbox is gonna be super weak, got it.
chickdigger802
Junior Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

chickdigger802's Avatar
#15

how many cores?
nhlducks35
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

nhlducks35's Avatar
#16

Architecture makes a difference
Insane Metal
Received Internet Coal
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

Insane Metal's Avatar
#17

Quoting myself, from the other thread:

Originally Posted by Insane Metal: View Post
Yeah, people forget that technology advancement is more important than Ghz. The first processors to get to 3Ghz were the P4. That was back in 2002 IIRC. 10 years later, how further have we gone? 4Ghz? But if you compare the 22nm microarchitecture of today with the 130nm of that time you know what happens.
Also,

Originally Posted by Alchemy: View Post
Believe it has three CPUs (each dual core) at 3.2ghz.
It's actually one CPU, with 3 cores, running at 3.2Ghz, each one capable of two threads.
Last edited by Insane Metal; 12-02-2012 at 01:56 AM.
Eyothrie
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:52 AM)

Eyothrie's Avatar
#18

Oh god, I would LOL myself to death if this is true
Glorified G
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:53 AM)

Glorified G's Avatar
#19

Did he also say the architecture is 13 years old?
DonMigs85
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:53 AM)

DonMigs85's Avatar
#20

Is it 8 cores? With very high IPC and OoOE?
Orayn
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:53 AM)

Orayn's Avatar
#21

Originally Posted by Hero of Legend: View Post
What's the Mhz of the PS3 and 360's CPU again?

Edit: Answered above.

Ahem...

Why would you make the CPU weaker than your own last console!?

Unless it has more threads or cores or whatnot, but in raw numbers, that to me is unheard of, but I'm no expert so...
You are definitely not an expert. CPU architecture is more than clock speed and number of cores.
THE:MILKMAN
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:53 AM)
#22

I posted that in the Wii U thread earlier.

And most of the responses in this thread so far is why I didn't post it as a new topic.
User Name Here
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:54 AM)

User Name Here's Avatar
#23

1.6ghz x 8 cores with two threads each? Or what?
frankie_baby
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:54 AM)
#24

Originally Posted by Glorified G: View Post
Did he also say the architecture is 13 years old?
Isn't it x86 based? That's like 30 years old
Massa
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:54 AM)

Massa's Avatar
#25

Originally Posted by Glorified G: View Post
Did he also say the architecture is 13 years old?
Being an x86 the Durango is even older than that.

Edit: beaten.
Alchemy
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:54 AM)

Alchemy's Avatar
#26

BUT DUDES, HOW MANY BITS?
KojiKnight
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:55 AM)

KojiKnight's Avatar
#27

No mention of cores or architecture... Obviously MHZ/GHZ isn't everything, that was Marcan's entire point in mentioning it in relation to the Wii U. Real question is, are all next gen systems ditching the high power CPUs? Wouldn't surprise me... more and more can be offset onto the GPU... Even if the CPU is only 30% faster than a Wii U (not just mhz wise, but actually only 30% faster overall) but the GPU is 3-5x stronger than the Wii U's the results would still be staggering.
Router
Hopsiah the Kanga-Jew
(12-02-2012, 01:55 AM)

Router's Avatar
#28

How many cores? how many threads per core? ect....
TheD
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:56 AM)
#29

What arch?

Because most x86 CPUs from AMD or Intel are a lot faster clock for clock than xenon or the WiiU CPU (bar the atom), if it is something like Intel's main CPU line then it would murder them.
apana
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:56 AM)

apana's Avatar
#30

Originally Posted by Router: View Post
How many cores? how many threads per core? ect....
At least a thousand threads per core until the console launch.
Hero_of_the_Day
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:56 AM)

Hero_of_the_Day's Avatar
#31

Originally Posted by Eyothrie: View Post
Oh god, I would LOL myself to death if this is true
Why? What does this tell you that you get lulz from?
Router
Hopsiah the Kanga-Jew
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Router's Avatar
#32

Originally Posted by apana: View Post
At least a thousand threads per core until the console launch.
I am satisfied with this answer.
Arklite
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Arklite's Avatar
#33

Even out of context it sounds too conservative for MSoft and the next Xbox. Not denying it but I wouldn't place any bets on that.
GAMERG0D
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

GAMERG0D's Avatar
#34

It should be Quad Core @ 2 GHz imo.
Glorified G
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Glorified G's Avatar
#35

Originally Posted by KojiKnight: View Post
No mention of cores or architecture...
You realize without this info, this means nothing. right?
Orayn
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Orayn's Avatar
#36

Originally Posted by User Name Here: View Post
1.6ghz x 8 cores with two threads each? Or what?
Take a look at this list and notice that the numbers go up with the same amount of cores at the same frequency.

Originally Posted by Glorified G: View Post
You realize without this info, this means nothing. right?
It could be an early lead if people wanted to start looking for commercially available parts of likely architectures around that clock speed.
SRTtoZ
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

SRTtoZ's Avatar
#37

this thread makes no sense.

1) Rumor

2) how many cores/threads?

Its all meaningless unless you know that info.

My processor is 2.3ghz, OH NO, so bad right? Oh wait, its an ivy bridge i7.
Visualante2
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Visualante2's Avatar
#38

Did Reggie tell them this?
Insane Metal
Received Internet Coal
(12-02-2012, 01:57 AM)

Insane Metal's Avatar
#39

Originally Posted by apana: View Post
At least a thousand threads per core until the console launch.
*slow clap*
Hero of Legend
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

Hero of Legend's Avatar
#40

Originally Posted by Orayn: View Post
You are definitely not an expert. CPU architecture is more than clock speed and number of cores.
As I said. :P

So if Gigaflops is too expensive to run a CPU properly, go with Flipflops, much snugglier.
hiryu64
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

hiryu64's Avatar
#41

Direct link to post in question: https://twitter.com/marcan42/status/274856397915697152
Seance
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

Seance's Avatar
#42

XBox 180 confirmed
Dynamite Shikoku
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

Dynamite Shikoku's Avatar
#43

Why would a wii hacker have this information?
Valnen
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

Valnen's Avatar
#44

Originally Posted by GAMERG0D: View Post
It should be Quad Core @ 2 GHz imo.
More like 5 GHZ. At least.
Chamber
love on your sleeve
(12-02-2012, 01:58 AM)

Chamber's Avatar
#45

So 360 is SSJ Vegeta and Durango is Yamcha?
KojiKnight
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:59 AM)

KojiKnight's Avatar
#46

Originally Posted by Glorified G: View Post
You realize without this info, this means nothing. right?
Err yes, I know without that the information means nothing. I didn't make the thread to "prove a point". I merely posted what a prominent person in the hardware hacking business said. New news = New thread.

(edit) Dynamite: he's a general hardware hacker, he's working on iphone, PS3, wii, and Wii U. He also knows a lot of people in the industry. It's, of course, possible his information is wrong. Hence the "rumor" tag on the thread, but he's likely to have more accurate information than, say, Prachter or other analysts.
LeBrick James
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:59 AM)

LeBrick James's Avatar
#47

Originally Posted by GAMERG0D: View Post
It should be Quad Core @ 2 GHz imo.
I bought my CPU 3 years ago and it beats that.
Hero of Legend
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:59 AM)

Hero of Legend's Avatar
#48

Mr. Marcan, how many cores/threads/Mhz does it take to get to the center of this debate?
Zefah
Member
(12-02-2012, 01:59 AM)
#49

Mhz doesn't mean shit across different architectures.

Compare a 3.8ghz Pentium 4 to an Ivy Bridge i7 at 3.5ghz in an application that only uses a single core. The Ivy Bridge will utterly smoke it.
shinobi602
(12-02-2012, 01:59 AM)

shinobi602's Avatar
#50

I call bullshit.