Herbspicesoy
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:42 PM)
#101

I'm interested in the game, but fuck announcements of trailers.
WARP10CK
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:47 PM)

WARP10CK's Avatar
#102

Originally Posted by faridmon: View Post
Pretty much sums up my reaction
Trigger
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:48 PM)

Trigger's Avatar
#103

Originally Posted by RustyNails: View Post
I hate it when they make futuristic time so close to our time. 2077 is what, about 64 years from now? Yeah, lazers and space cars in 60 years.
Of course we will. You just have to believe.
Corky
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(01-03-2013, 04:48 PM)

Corky's Avatar
#104

Originally Posted by RustyNails: View Post
I hate it when they make futuristic time so close to our time. 2077 is what, about 64 years from now? Yeah, lazers and space cars in 60 years.
Imagine ~60 years ago talking to someone in the 1950s and saying to them "Would you believe we'll have space-stations in space within 50 years?". Now it's not Star Wars, but the ISS is still a space station and the first parts were in space well before 2000 I believe.

Not saying we will shoot lasers out our eyes in 60 years from now but technology is still advancing at a rapid and exponential pace.
.la1n
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:48 PM)

.la1n's Avatar
#105

Yes, the company has proven itself, real cyberpunk game get.

injurai
Banned
(01-03-2013, 04:53 PM)
#106

Originally Posted by RustyNails: View Post
I hate it when they make futuristic time so close to our time. 2077 is what, about 64 years from now? Yeah, lazers and space cars in 60 years.
I really don't think the jump will be too much. We already have exosuits and other crazy tech in the works. Even if its not commercialized for consumers you will see it in the military and corporate warehouses.

Look at Google glass. In 20 years we may all wear stuff like that on our faces.
Corky
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(01-03-2013, 04:55 PM)

Corky's Avatar
#107

Originally Posted by injurai: View Post
I really don't think the jump will be too much.

Look at Google glass. In 20 years we may all wear stuff like that on our faces.
I think what people get hung up on is the advancements in personal transportation. While no doubt we have mindboggling strides in cars, compare the Ford model T to...hmm say a Bugatti Veyron or something, we still don't have flying cars - probably because we don't need them.
i-Lo
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:56 PM)

i-Lo's Avatar
#108

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
Imagine ~60 years ago talking to someone in the 1950s and saying to them "Would you believe we'll have space-stations in space within 50 years?". Now it's not Star Wars, but the ISS is still a space station and the first parts were in space well before 2000 I believe.

Not saying we will shoot lasers out our eyes in 60 years from now but technology is still advancing at a rapid and exponential pace.
Also, hasn't scientific and technological progression accelerated in the last 40 or so years with the advent of computers?

While I don't know about flying cars, by 2077, I'm pretty sure, there'll be certain technologies (esp, with all the talk of 3D printing) available for most that we think of infeasible with our current outlook.
-BLITZ-
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:57 PM)

-BLITZ-'s Avatar
#109

Such great news, I really want to see this. I Hope is not just CG stuff.
TucoBenedictoPacifico
Member
(01-03-2013, 04:57 PM)

TucoBenedictoPacifico's Avatar
#110

Originally Posted by RustyNails: View Post
I hate it when they make futuristic time so close to our time. 2077 is what, about 64 years from now? Yeah, lazers and space cars in 60 years.
The funny thing in this statement is: the technological gap from today's standards 60 years from now will probably be far bigger than most cyberpunk settings ever predicted, at least in some fields.
Hell, in some aspects even today we are already ahead of what the '80s version of the P&P game predicted.

Originally Posted by Baller, PhD: View Post
Damn, it's actually called "Cyberpunk?"

Weak...
Oh god, not this again.
It's not called "generic cyberpunk stuff, durr".
It's named after the CYBERPUNK pen&paper roleplay game.
That's it. Cyberpunk is the actual name of the IP.
Corto
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:00 PM)

Corto's Avatar
#111

The plot thickens... And by plot I mean my penis.
Trojita
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:04 PM)

Trojita's Avatar
#112

My PC is ready.
codhand
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:05 PM)

codhand's Avatar
#113

as long as i can download the polish language pack im happy, and even if i cant im still happy, na zdrowie
Trojita
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:05 PM)

Trojita's Avatar
#114

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
Imagine ~60 years ago talking to someone in the 1950s and saying to them "Would you believe we'll have space-stations in space within 50 years?". Now it's not Star Wars, but the ISS is still a space station and the first parts were in space well before 2000 I believe.

Not saying we will shoot lasers out our eyes in 60 years from now but technology is still advancing at a rapid and exponential pace.
People in the 60's thought we were going to have colonies on the moon and mars by the 1990's.
Corky
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(01-03-2013, 05:06 PM)

Corky's Avatar
#115

Originally Posted by i-Lo: View Post
Also, hasn't scientific and technological progression accelerated in the last 40 or so years with the advent of computers?

While I don't know about flying cars, by 2077, I'm pretty sure, there'll be certain technologies (esp, with all the talk of 3D printing) available for most that we think of infeasible with our current outlook.
Indeed, also for what it's worth ( I don't remember whether or not this is even true so take it with a grain of salt ) but I remember reading a claim that every year the amount of accumulated scientific papers and research outnumber those from all other previous years combined. Sorry for the OT :D

Originally Posted by Trojita: View Post
They thought we were going to have colonies on the moon and mars by the 1990's.
If the need arose and expansion was our main scientific goal ( instead of the current militaristic one ) we could have, why not? Astronomical cost and the need to do so aside, I don't see any part of the puzzle that we haven't technically solved by now ( with regards to having humans inhabit the moon ),
tranciful
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:06 PM)
#116

Will it be true cyberpunk/sci fi, or just the same ol' mechanics painted over in a 'sci fi' gleam?
Midou
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:08 PM)

Midou's Avatar
#117

My body is ready. We have so few RPGs with actual depth, and even fewer proper Cyberpunk games.

Witcher Dev is my favorite up-and-coming this gen(even though they are technically older than that in some ways), my body is ready.
injurai
Banned
(01-03-2013, 05:09 PM)
#118

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
I think what people get hung up on is the advancements in personal transportation. While no doubt we have mindboggling strides in cars, compare the Ford model T to...hmm say a Bugatti Veyron or something, we still don't have flying cars - probably because we don't need them.
Originally Posted by i-Lo: View Post
Also, hasn't scientific and technological progression accelerated in the last 40 or so years with the advent of computers?

While I don't know about flying cars, by 2077, I'm pretty sure, there'll be certain technologies (esp, with all the talk of 3D printing) available for most that we think of infeasible with our current outlook.
From the beginning of the new honda commerial. Looks like flying vehicles are atleast becoming a thing of tecnology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WbWmdNAdhM

Quote:
Last edited by injurai; 01-03-2013 at 05:12 PM.
Serra
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:13 PM)
#119

Originally Posted by Trojita: View Post
My PC is ready.
Couldn't have said it any better.

I just hope its gameplay footage, I really don't understand the appeal of CG trailers.
Corky
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(01-03-2013, 05:15 PM)

Corky's Avatar
#120

Originally Posted by Serra: View Post

I just hope its gameplay footage, I really don't understand the appeal of CG trailers.
I guess to show off games that are otherwise in an unfinished/polished state. In other words : better than nothing since noone is going to go and use pre-alpha gameplay as commercials/marketing.
TucoBenedictoPacifico
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:16 PM)

TucoBenedictoPacifico's Avatar
#121

Originally Posted by injurai: View Post
From the beginning of the new honda commerial. Looks like flying vehicles are atleast becoming a thing of tecnology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WbWmdNAdhM
In terms of being technologically feasible they were "a thing" years ago. If they aren't widely spread among the people is simply because we realized over the years they are neither cost-effective, particularly safe or all that useful.
Hindle
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:16 PM)

Hindle's Avatar
#122

If this isn't out until 2015 then it's a bit too soon for a trailer. My guess? It's coming next year.

I'm thinking it will be stylised CGI like the first Deus Ex trailers.
Serra
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:19 PM)
#123

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
I guess to show off games that are otherwise in an unfinished/polished state. In other words : better than nothing since noone is going to go and use pre-alpha gameplay as commercials/marketing.
Why not wait until the game is in a good shape (~3 months before release, I hope) and start burning that marketing budget then?
injurai
Banned
(01-03-2013, 05:19 PM)
#124

Originally Posted by TucoBenedictoPacifico: View Post
In terms of being technologically feasible they were "a thing" years ago. If they aren't widely spread among the people is simply because we realized over the years they are neither cost-effective, particularly safe or all that useful.
hopefully only the Bourgeoisie owns them in Cyperpunk then.
Trigger
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:20 PM)

Trigger's Avatar
#125

Originally Posted by tranciful: View Post
Will it be true cyberpunk/sci fi, or just the same ol' mechanics painted over in a 'sci fi' gleam?
What is the difference?
Delusibeta
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:21 PM)

Delusibeta's Avatar
#126



Excellent. In CD Projekt RED we trust.
Corky
Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
(01-03-2013, 05:21 PM)

Corky's Avatar
#127

Originally Posted by Serra: View Post
Why not wait until the game is in a good shape (~3 months before release, I hope) and start burning that marketing budget then?
I'm sure there's some legit math behind when to market and how much/wide etc but I have no idea why certain games, movies, whatever, are shown/marketed so early.
Mesoian
Member
(01-03-2013, 05:24 PM)

Mesoian's Avatar
#128

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
I'm sure there's some legit math behind when to market and how much/wide etc but I have no idea why certain games, movies, whatever, are shown/marketed so early.
Word of mouth. When there's almost no chance this game is going to get an american television marketing budget, you have to use every last element of marketing to your advantage. If they can put this out now, get it run on every last gaming website and strike up a buzz, they'll be a good position. You do that every 5 months until release and make a big push with the traditional market 2 weeks before release and 6 weeks after.
injurai
Banned
(01-03-2013, 05:27 PM)
#129

Originally Posted by Corky: View Post
I'm sure there's some legit math behind when to market and how much/wide etc but I have no idea why certain games, movies, whatever, are shown/marketed so early.
Originally Posted by Mesoian: View Post
Word of mouth. When there's almost no chance this game is going to get an american television marketing budget, you have to use every last element of marketing to your advantage. If they can put this out now, get it run on every last gaming website and strike up a buzz, they'll be a good position. You do that every 5 months until release and make a big push with the traditional market 2 weeks before release and 6 weeks after.
Word of mouth sells better than anything.

Also investors.
Blizzard
Member
(01-03-2013, 06:09 PM)

Blizzard's Avatar
#130

Originally Posted by Serra: View Post
Couldn't have said it any better.

I just hope its gameplay footage, I really don't understand the appeal of CG trailers.
I also like gameplay, but this comes up so often, here's a question: What were the last trailers, especially world premier first-ever trailers, that were filled with gameplay and sold you on the game because of that?

I feel that the enormously vast majority of trailers have cutscenes, CG, and/or edited gameplay. Watching ordinary gameplay with a HUD or something may bore a fair number of people, and probably doesn't fit well into smalll advertising slots. I understand the desire from some people to see gameplay, but I guess I feel like there are often vocal reactions of dismay or surprise when a trailer is not primarily gameplay, and I think that such expectations are unrealistic for a variety of reasons, like the ones mentioned above. :P

In fact, the Deus Ex HR trailer was one of my favorite ever. I don't think it even had gameplay, but I liked the mood it set and loved the music and some of the lines in the trailer. I almost wanted to buy the game to reward the effort spent to make the trailer, as funny as that may sound. I do like the atmosphere and concept of the Deus Ex games though, and I tend to read lots of fantasy/scifi/cyberpunk so I was biased in that regard.
sflufan
Member
(01-03-2013, 06:13 PM)

sflufan's Avatar
#131

Originally Posted by tranciful: View Post
Will it be true cyberpunk/sci fi, or just the same ol' mechanics painted over in a 'sci fi' gleam?
Considering that the fellow who developed the original PnP RPG is heavily involved in the project, what would you say the answer is?
Dictator93
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:12 PM)

Dictator93's Avatar
#132

Originally Posted by TucoBenedictoPacifico: View Post
In terms of being technologically feasible they were "a thing" years ago. If they aren't widely spread among the people is simply because we realized over the years they are neither cost-effective, particularly safe or all that useful.
or like the oil industry... because it gets in the way of our business and makes us structurally obsolete.

Read about street cars in the U.S., it will make you sad-_-

ALSO. HYPE!!!!!!!!
inky
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:18 PM)

inky's Avatar
#133

Can't wait.
The Nature Roy
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:22 PM)

The Nature Roy's Avatar
#134

Originally Posted by RustyNails: View Post
I hate it when they make futuristic time so close to our time. 2077 is what, about 64 years from now? Yeah, lazers and space cars in 60 years.
60 years is so far in the future that any predictions we make now will almost invariably prove incredibly wrong -- likely too ambitious in some respects and far too conservative in many others. If MNT proves possible, the advances will be far greater than any of us can comprehend.

I agree with your sentiment but not for 2077. Now DX:HR (as much as I loved that game), being set in 2025? Yeah, that's pretty goofy, although I realize they were hemmed in by the timeline of the franchise.
Acosta
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:29 PM)

Acosta's Avatar
#135

YEEESSSSSSSS!
injurai
Banned
(01-03-2013, 07:40 PM)
#136

Originally Posted by The Nature Roy: View Post
60 years is so far in the future that any predictions we make now will almost invariably prove incredibly wrong -- likely too ambitious in some respects and far too conservative in many others. If MNT proves possible, the advances will be far greater than any of us can comprehend.

I agree with your sentiment but not for 2077. Now DX:HR (as much as I loved that game), being set in 2025? Yeah, that's pretty goofy, although I realize they were hemmed in by the timeline of the franchise.
Exactly. Look at bioshock. No way we could actually pull off Rapture back then. No way could we do it now. Not feasibly at least. Then we have metal gear which is in some ways a conservative look at the future. But then we also have other crazy technologies depicted.

There will always be some technologies that push the bleeding edge more than others, and I'm interested to see how everything gets flushed out for 2077.
Kobalty
Junior Member
(01-03-2013, 07:52 PM)

Kobalty's Avatar
#137

crabman
Junior Member
(01-03-2013, 10:10 PM)

crabman's Avatar
#138

Hell yeah :-)
Fjordson
Member
(01-03-2013, 10:40 PM)

Fjordson's Avatar
#139

I can't freaking wait.

And 2077 seems plenty futuristic to me. Blade Runner was set only 37 years in the future when it came out? This is over 60.
Raven77
Member
(01-03-2013, 10:47 PM)

Raven77's Avatar
#140

I want to get that logo tattooed all over MA BODAY!@!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kaako
Felium Defensor
(01-03-2013, 10:51 PM)

Kaako's Avatar
#141

I'm super excited for this. Hope the trailer blows us away in a good way.
EDarkness
Member
(01-03-2013, 10:59 PM)
#142

Originally Posted by TucoBenedictoPacifico: View Post
Oh god, not this again.
It's not called "generic cyberpunk stuff, durr".
It's named after the CYBERPUNK pen&paper roleplay game.
That's it. Cyberpunk is the actual name of the IP.
Man, I loved the pen and paper RPG back in the day. I still have all of the source books as well. But damn, the gun combat in that game was brutal. Much like real life one shot and you're toast. Players in my campaigns tried to avoid shootouts as much as possible. I imagine they'll make some adjustments to it so that it's more fun.
Delusibeta
Member
(01-03-2013, 11:07 PM)

Delusibeta's Avatar
#143

Originally Posted by Herbspicesoy: View Post
I'm interested in the game, but fuck announcements of trailers.
This isn't really what I'd call an "announcement".
BigTnaples
Member
(01-03-2013, 11:31 PM)

BigTnaples's Avatar
#144

Not as hyped as many people around here are. Hopefully I will be after seeing this trailer. If anything I am hoping for some competitive graphics. The Witcher 2 disappointed me graphically in everything but IQ and Texture work.



Also, by 2077 I think we will be surprised where we are technically. Although I will be long dead sans any miraculous life extending tech.


I recommend reading The Singularity is Near by Ray Kurzweil.
op_ivy
Fallen Xbot (cannot continue gaining levels in this class)
(01-03-2013, 11:58 PM)

op_ivy's Avatar
#145

oh hell yes.
TriGen
Member
(01-04-2013, 12:01 AM)

TriGen's Avatar
#146

Looking forward to see how this is coming along.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
(01-04-2013, 12:02 AM)

LiquidMetal14's Avatar
#147

GATDAM
chertipros
Member
(01-04-2013, 12:04 AM)

chertipros's Avatar
#148

HYPE
MisterNugNug
Member
(01-04-2013, 12:05 AM)

MisterNugNug's Avatar
#149

Currently playing through the Witcher 2; really enjoying it. Can't wait to see this trailer; I love sci-fi rpgs.
RibMan
Member
(01-04-2013, 01:40 AM)
#150

Very excited to see this, hopefully the trailer will show real-time gameplay.