|
(01-05-2013, 05:56 PM)
|
#102
Valve isn't going to launch a game platform that can't run half the games on Steam. If they are going with Linux then their engineers have some solution to DX only titles, and I bet it's a lot better than WINE or any other existing solution to running Windows games on Linux systems.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 05:56 PM)
|
#103
And no, there's no way Valve would go exclusive for the Steambox. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 05:57 PM)
|
#105
Can't see what they could have to offer to developers to get bigger titles on a linux system, unless the dx to opengl thing actually provides minimum work for them. The idea is intriguing to me though. If they have a full htpc experience with bluray and netflix(don't think netflix is available on linux) lined up it could be pretty cool.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 05:57 PM)
|
#108
Linux is a great choice as far as giving them the ability to customize the experience, empower the users, and free themselves from potential walls put up by MS.
However, the game library is going to be a major challenge as will get better driver support. That said, if they can get developers on board, it will make for a very bright future. On the up side, Steam does enable your games to accessible on all Steam systems (provided the game runs on that system), so if someone does try the steam box and later decide they'd rather go windows, their games will be waiting for them. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 05:57 PM)
|
#109
Because it's a stupid idea and they're not big enough to make a costly mistake. WTF would I want something that can only play 1 percent of my library? And if they think they can compete with Sony or MS in the console space, perhaps they should recheck and look at how much they lose in those opening years (and only recoup after massive volume). If this is all there is to the plan, it's a terrible mistake they're going to regret. There has to be some exciting caveat (beyond HL3 being exclusive, because they would just compound the mistake). EDIT: Fixed for wrong quote. |
|
for whom the Bell trolls
(01-05-2013, 05:57 PM)
|
#111
I'm unclear on the market that such a device would exist for. Current Steam users are already deeply entrenched in Windows PCs and we already have three major competitors in the console space. Is there an untapped "hardcore" market this would be reaching?
|
|
incest on the subway
(01-05-2013, 05:59 PM)
|
#113
Kind of funny to see people who are disappointed it will run linux. It is a black-box, be happy it runs linux, it'll just work. Expect the presence/popularity of such a device to make linux versions of popular games commonplace instead of a rarity.
Deeply entrenched? More like a 3-year cycle at the end of which you upgrade your CPU/GPU, and RAM.
Last edited by Woo-Fu; 01-05-2013 at 06:05 PM.
|
|
Junior Member
(01-05-2013, 05:59 PM)
|
#114
No, but they do have strong first party exclusives (Nintendo), hundreds of millions in marketing dollars behind it and companies that are willing or at least capable to lose several billions of dollars on the machine. Does the Steambox have that?
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:00 PM)
|
#115
Depends on how much customization they're doing to the hardware and firmware. I doubt they'd lock the bootloader and BIOS but if it's anything that more than slightly deviates from stock PC stuff Windows might not like it.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:00 PM)
|
#116
I don't think Valve would be moving forward with such an idea unless a signficant amount of publishers were on board. Plus, it'll probably be competing with next gen consoles, not just a box for your older Steam games.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:00 PM)
|
#117
Most PC gamers will just buy a PC like until now and console gamers won't be interested on a box that won't get, potentially, some of the major third party games....
Last edited by Relaxed Muscle; 01-05-2013 at 06:03 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:01 PM)
|
#119
According to this article, linux *is* the OS. However, given the nature of linux, nothing is stopping them from layering their own "desktop manager" and "windows manger" on it, which would probably be dominated by big picture mode with some extra stuff for managing the system. That is, it can be linux and still have a very console-like experience.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:01 PM)
|
#120
Yeah, especially considering that Microsoft is going to be a direct competitor of theirs with their new rumoured XBox, they could not rely too much on their support in the first place.
Last edited by Gianni Merryman; 01-05-2013 at 06:03 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:02 PM)
|
#123
It depends on how easy Valve is able to make the API porting process. They have some very smart engineers so it's definitely possible. Drivers are another big concern but I don't doubt they'll be able to get AMD and nVidia on board, Intel is already there.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:02 PM)
|
#124
If Steambox will gain millions of users in the first 6 months, devs might be interested with it. I doubt this will be backwards compatible with current games. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:02 PM)
|
#129
Well, at first, I merely thought this was going to be something like an Alienware X51 type of deal.
Last edited by Dark_AnNiaLatOr; 01-05-2013 at 06:16 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:03 PM)
|
#131
Also this whole thing is based around Steam for Linux and BPM, which means you'd be able to build your own Linux system from scratch and get basically the same experience. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:03 PM)
|
#132
Last edited by JaseC; 01-05-2013 at 06:06 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:04 PM)
|
#135
Yeah, way too early until we see what this thing can do. Might be some devs out there working on ports of many games already.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:05 PM)
|
#137
Way to justify your argument.
It's not going to be some Ubuntu desktop. It will be Big Picture mode running on a Linux kernel and the games using an OpenGL derivative. Kind of like the PS3 (which uses Linux for the XMB). Crazy how many people think because it's not windows it's already a piece of shit. ...and more competition the better in my eyes. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:05 PM)
|
#139
I really doubt that this will get all the PC game devs to put out Linux versions. At this point you are more likely to get a Mac version of a game than a Linux one. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:06 PM)
|
#141
Yup.
That $50-$100 licence fee would be much better spent on RAM / HDD space / next tier CPU/GPU / Whatever |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:06 PM)
|
#142
It will take a big shift in the amount of effort most devs put into PC ports for multiplats to get any significant amount of games working on Linux unless Valve pulls some magic out of their ass.
I'm all for Valve seeing more success though, especially since they want to bring more innovation to the hardware market, so I hope they pull through and this thing they're making serves a purpose. |
|
Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment
(01-05-2013, 06:07 PM)
|
#143
Why would they anyway? I mean, I doubt this means that Valve will suddenly abandon Steam. For all we know, the thing probably runs on Steam with a very limited library of games due to it being Linux based.
|
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:08 PM)
|
#145
The cool opportunity they have here is if it releases on Steam, then it could be accessible to any Steam-running system, provided it runs on that platform. If a dev make a linux-based game, it's probably safe to assume they will have a windows and perhaps even Mac compatible version released (since Macs are unix and openGL based). So that kind of has the cool possibility of your purchase being playable on PC/Mac/Linux.
|
|
incest on the subway
(01-05-2013, 06:09 PM)
|
#146
Valve has to promote and sell enough of these devices to make a linux version attractive to the publishers. If anybody can do it it is probably Valve. |
|
Member
(01-05-2013, 06:11 PM)
|
#150
1)What the point? Why would anyone buy this thing when the entire library is already available on Windows/Consoles?
2) Does Valve have the man power to distribute this product in multiple regions around the world? I like Valve but I don't see how this will works in any possible way. |