|
Member
(01-23-2013, 02:55 PM)
|
#101
Well, Xenoblade for Wii looked fantastic. They have great art direction, but while the game looks great, it doesn't take real long to make mostly open fields. Square, as slow as they have been, puts a lot of detail into their towns. Probably not enough to justify the wait, but FF13 looked fantastic. That game was linear though.
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
(01-23-2013, 02:56 PM)
|
#102
Sales is what keeps a company running.
Why? So far branching out to Europe and NA has been paying off for SE, with Deus Ex:HR being a big hit. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 02:56 PM)
|
#104
Problem with this is that they are doing nothing with it. The wait between Final Fantasy games is a long, laboured exercise. Tons of promises and nothing to show for it for years on end. Meanwhile, a number of challengers have come in to usurp their throne. Square is ripe for losing their position. |
|
Super Adventure Boxing
(01-23-2013, 02:57 PM)
|
#106
Otherwise the thread title would be about Bethesda and Blizzard. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 02:58 PM)
|
#108
Or more accurately, a luminous engine game. Anyways, the fact that most here believe that X destroys all current gen jrpgs in fidelity = Wii U next gen confirmed.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 02:59 PM)
|
#110
I don't see why there is a need to involve Square-Enix. This game looks more like competition for Monster Hunter instead of Final Fantasy.
If this is exclusive to Wii U, then S-E has nothing to worried about since FF13 series will definitely be on top with sales. |
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 03:00 PM)
|
#111
Boy bands sold millions upon millions of albums, but that doesn't mean their music was any good.
|
|
Tomodachi wa Mahou
(01-23-2013, 03:02 PM)
|
#116
Only brought it up because people are saying silly things like this game is going to kill off Square-Enix or that its over for them because of this game.
Monolith is a great developer and I'm sure this game will be great but I don't see what the relevance is to Square-Enix - when they manage to put out a compelling product with great quality (and this is what you can argue that they struggle at) then it obliterates everything else. What exactly does Monolith have to do with this? |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:03 PM)
|
#117
![]() But Versus exists. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:11 PM)
|
#121
|
|
Tragic victim of fan death
(01-23-2013, 03:11 PM)
|
#122
In all seriousness, graphics and in gameplay, I'm more impressed with X than I am with that gameplay trailer from Versus a long while back. This trailer blows the Versus one out of the water. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:12 PM)
|
#123
But if it is a proper RPG and the art in areas is not as generic as in the trailer, i will definitly get a WiiU for it Seems i am extremely spoilt by the detail and variety in 2D art :) |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:15 PM)
|
#125
Jumping the gun and saying "This is how it should be done, Square!!" comes off as childish any way you dress it up. There's just little overlap to be had beyond the superficial console/company warrior junk. |
|
(01-23-2013, 03:16 PM)
|
#126
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:17 PM)
|
#127
This. Xenoblade was amazing and easily the best RPG of last gen. This game will just confirm two things: how great a developer Monolith Soft is and how far SE has fallen from it's former grace.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:20 PM)
|
#130
SE has then provided multitudes of other titles as well in the past few years. I'm not sure where this comparison really leads. I like the fact that Monolith AND SE can make high-quality, convincing titles. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:20 PM)
|
#132
What interests me about Versus is its aesthetic; that it seems to be set in a world that is near-modern and could possibly be somewhat more tied to reality in its characters and story.
Guys fighting dinosaurs in mechs is pretty much the polar opposite of that. |
|
Tragic victim of fan death
(01-23-2013, 03:21 PM)
|
#133
Are we going to compare portable development/game with a console one?
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:21 PM)
|
#135
Haven't played Type-0 so I can't make an opinion regarding that title.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:23 PM)
|
#139
Because this thread was created in some way to discredit Square-Enix because they can't do HD games?
Xenoblade didn't feature towns that even close rivaled FF12's. And this Xenogears Trailer we got showed zero towns. It's not hard to make HD fields and mountains. Square is clearly taking a lot of time to make their games. |
|
(01-23-2013, 03:27 PM)
|
#146
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:27 PM)
|
#147
Monolith proved themselves several times over with Xenoblade.
They are worthy of the hype with only a trailer as basis. Don't really see the need putting down SE in an comparison though. They have enough problems on their own, hur hur ;) Did not know of the founders connection with SE , that is very cool. |
|
Tragic victim of fan death
(01-23-2013, 03:27 PM)
|
#149
Well, we knew it was coming, right?
You're comparing a tech demo to an actual game trailer? Even if the graphics/gameplay isn't indicative of what the final product is, at least Mono announced the game and had a trailer to show for it. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 03:27 PM)
|
#150
The trailer showed more and the concept seems more interesting to me...sure this looks awesome and better visually at the moment, but we have seen versus for over 2 years. That is a huge amount of time. If it still exists the visuals have probably been improved greatly. I am not wholly convinced it still exists though. To be honest, the environments in Versus look to have more local detail.
This looks much better than Lightning Returns though. Aesthetic Reminds me of Halo 4
Last edited by nelsonroyale; 01-23-2013 at 03:31 PM.
|