|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:17 PM)
|
#51
|
|
(01-23-2013, 06:17 PM)
|
#52
Sounds like complete BS. Also the controller sounds awful
|
|
jerking off to field goals
(01-23-2013, 06:17 PM)
|
#54
could be related to the jaguar cores being difficult to make and having low yields rumor? So they put in bulldozer for temp
|
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-23-2013, 06:17 PM)
|
#55
Bulldozer is actually the predecessor of steamrollers.
Why would they still have that in the latest kit if they were switching to Jaguars? Why not use bobcats instead? Or just easier to put bulldozers in a regular PC box alongside the other components instead of Jags? Ah OK. That makes sense at least. |
|
formerly Strider2K99
(01-23-2013, 06:18 PM)
|
#59
On a PS3, not with 4 separate accounts at once. At most, I believe you can do two PSN accounts signed in at once and it seems to be a game by game basis. For example, LBP supports only one PSN account for player 1, players 2-4 must use a guest account to play the game and can't sign into their own PSN accounts and earn trophies.
|
|
(01-23-2013, 06:19 PM)
|
#61
If it's on the back, making it click-able could solve accidental problems for games that just want to use it as extra buttons. So potential for extra shoulder button control + capacitive sensing, something I was hoping for.
|
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 06:19 PM)
|
#62
basically i think superdae does have legit dev kits, he just uses them to troll mostly it seems. |
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-23-2013, 06:19 PM)
|
#63
The touchpad thing sounds strange if only because they say it's two-point multitouch, whilst Vita's is several point multitouch.
Unless that pad is also, actually, an array of biometric sensors, and it can also be used for tracking touch gestures. One of their biometric-related patents talks about that. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:21 PM)
|
#64
Not sure if I like the idea or not, but it won't be as intrusive on a controller to me. Basically just gives us more input options in an area where nothing was at anyway. I'll be more interested to see how developers would use that though since there could be some cool ideas for it compared to the 90% of devs that will use it for gimmicks. I could see it being really useful in RTS games which is a genre overlooked on consoles quite often. Obviously not as good as PC controls, but it could at least make console RTS games more comfortable. |
|
Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Igby Chicken Caesar
(01-23-2013, 06:22 PM)
|
#67
That dev kit can totally emulate a ps3.
I hope the console exclusive jaguar implementation holds up. Also that VRam is the special sauce.(could be EDRAM as suspected by others in the thread)
Last edited by SirIgbyCeaser; 01-23-2013 at 06:26 PM.
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(01-23-2013, 06:22 PM)
|
#69
bobcats don't play as nicely together as jaguars. the biggest part of the bobcat>jaguar progression is being able to cram more cores on one chip. there are also developer overheads to think about.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:23 PM)
|
#70
The controller could be interesting. Gimmick or not, I would like them to explore some new means of interactivity instead of generic motion controls. There's a lot of room for creativity for things like biometrics and touch-sensitivity. The key would be how well its integrated into the standard controller, and whether it comes at the expense of something else.
Not to mention all the weird shit certain companies will be sure to try. |
|
If this poster agrees with you, you're doing something very wrong.
(01-23-2013, 06:23 PM)
|
#71
Also 8 GB + 2 GB in Devkit? 4 GB + 1 GB in real life? Makes a lot more sense than 4 GB GDDR5 to me. |
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 06:24 PM)
|
#72
I'll just copy paste what I wrote in the vgleaks thread:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:25 PM)
|
#74
It's kotaku though, so el oh el. They just want clicks |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:26 PM)
|
#75
|
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-23-2013, 06:27 PM)
|
#78
But I guess it's just easier to use something bulldozer-based right now in dev kits. Jaguars aren't around, bobcat is probably hard to integrate into a dev kit per another comment above, etc. etc. |
|
(01-23-2013, 06:31 PM)
|
#83
|
|
Junior Member
(01-23-2013, 06:33 PM)
|
#86
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:34 PM)
|
#87
I dont care about this rumor.
Even if its all true [which I doubt], early PC devkits dont interest me. Too much of their hardware can not represent final console power or architecture. That is 100% true. It will be AMD APU [CPU and GPU on a single die], same as for Durango, only made with deferent end goals in mind. |
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-23-2013, 06:34 PM)
|
#89
|
|
(01-23-2013, 06:35 PM)
|
#90
|
|
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(01-23-2013, 06:36 PM)
|
#91
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:37 PM)
|
#94
Nvidia are cocky. AMD are cheaper.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:38 PM)
|
#95
|
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-23-2013, 06:38 PM)
|
#98
|