|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:18 PM)
|
AMD posts $473m Q4 loss, $1.18bn FY loss, stock goes up due to beat expectations
#1
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....795&highlight=
AMD are in trouble. Big trouble. Cash balance is down to $1bn, assets are dwindling, losses are rising, the processor division is in deep red and the graphics division is barely profitable. |
|
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:21 PM)
|
#10
|
|
lapdance transform pants
(01-23-2013, 05:22 PM)
|
#12
Mobile hardware that is too late, with Tegra taking over most of the market share. Company of choice for PS4/720 cause NVIDIA is too cocky, expensive and busy to take charge. |
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 05:22 PM)
|
#13
Their PC GPUs have been plagued with horrible and inexcusable problems and driver problems for years and it's driving people and exclusive contracts from developers to Nvidia.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:23 PM)
|
#14
Yep, definitely one of the reasons. All their shitty CF GPUs, terrible drivers and poor game support turned me to Nvidia.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:23 PM)
|
#16
Not to say that they're up to feature parity with Nvidia |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:24 PM)
|
#18
|
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 05:24 PM)
|
#19
If AMD goes down while in the middle of manufacturing for the next gen consoles, things will get VERY interesting for Nintendo VERY fast!
How fast can big companies fold? I really hope it won't be like Having fun with Dick and Jane, it would be disastrous for both Microsoft and Sony. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:24 PM)
|
#20
Nvidia makes better GPUs overall. Intel makes better CPUs overall. They fell behind in key areas at important tech shifts (like mobile). I don't want AMD to die. Both Intel and Nvidia need some form of competitor to prevent them from getting lazier than they are already getting. |
|
4chan's Official Representative
(01-23-2013, 05:26 PM)
|
#21
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:26 PM)
|
#22
their GPUs are solid. very solid. 7970 ghz edition > 680, BUT AMD GPUs have this stigma of getting bad drivers and having issues with games at launch that always need a hotfix. i personally never had any major issues with their drivers, but some people have them. I really think the whole bad drivers thing is extremely overblown from a personal perspective.
the one thing i want from them to survive is their GPU division because they do good work and do give us great products. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:26 PM)
|
#24
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:27 PM)
|
#26
*crickets* I do wish somebody with deep pockets would buy AMD and keep them around. I dont want Intel and Nvidia with no competition. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:27 PM)
|
#27
Because once you get the silicon design, it doesn't matter. AMD won these contracts precisely because they were so desperate. A healthier company would only take on the contract if it met a profit threshold they were happy with. AMD took what they could get. And the console makers didn't care, because all they needed was the design. AMD's fate after that was irrelevant.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:27 PM)
|
#28
I RMA'd a 7850 this week because it kept blue screening in Portal 2 and Crysis, despite passing furmark no problem.
|
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 05:27 PM)
|
#29
Doesn't matter if it's not happening anymore. They burned the bridge with customers and most will likely never come back. At least they won't be comfortable enough to come back by a time frame that includes AMD still being alive.
|
|
Banned from OT
(01-23-2013, 05:27 PM)
|
#30
They were to slow to react to the changing market. They should of had temash out much earlier. They should of also had brazos 2.0 out much sooner than they did. Once they found out how incredible the bobcat was they should of made it #1 priority of the company. I think they will be in better shape this year if they can get the jaguar SOCs out on time in large quantities. They should have the low end desktop, entry x86 tablets and laptop market locked down with temash and kabini.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:29 PM)
|
#36
i believe it's true. microsoft isn't buying chips from them. they're buying the rights to a manufacture a chip they developed with AMD specifically for use in their next console. it's the same thing they did with the 360. buy the blueprints and fab it out where you want.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:30 PM)
|
#37
Nope, that's the worst possible outcome especially seeing as they are already cocky enough to launch a fucking $900 graphics card. They know AMD is going down.
It shouldn't effect the pre-designed nextgen graphics hardware though. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:30 PM)
|
#42
nVidia did the same shit, but called their drivers "beta" to avoid complaints. AMD just isnt scummy enough to compete with nVidia and Intel, unfortunately. Especially with so many ignorant people spouting garbage the last decade.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:30 PM)
|
#44
I'm with shinobi on this matter. They have contracts for all 3 next gen consoles' GPUs/GPU designs, offer power within a single digit range of the nVidia competitors on average with prices that are easy on the consumer. Is it really just stigma (dem driverzzz) and their CPU development (more understandable) that's sinking them?
|
|
lapdance transform pants
(01-23-2013, 05:31 PM)
|
#48
I can be very wrong though.
Last edited by shagg_187; 01-23-2013 at 05:36 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:31 PM)
|
#49
Their products are cheaper, Nvidia has fucked both MS and Sony before, and their graphics division is on par with Nvidia hardware design wise. Also, if AMD proper goes bankrupt the graphics division would likely get snatched up by another company or get spun off. They're still profitable so I'm not too worried about an Nvidia monopoly. Either way, I'm not sure if the US government is willing to allow Intel a monopoly in the desktop industry.
Last edited by Tallshortman; 01-23-2013 at 05:35 PM.
|
|
(01-23-2013, 05:32 PM)
|
#50
|