|
Banned from OT
(01-23-2013, 05:32 PM)
|
#51
Since all the work is done it would have no affect on next generation. Depending if Sony and Ms paid all upfront or are paying a small royalty per chip it could be a windfall for them if they don't have to pay that small royalty per chip if AMD goes under.
|
|
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:32 PM)
|
#52
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:33 PM)
|
#54
I've owned nothing but amd cards since 2002, I think nvidia are massive dicks and have no love for them, but AMD drivers have been consistently shit since 2010.
I'm not even going to begin listing the games that had massive problems (performance, shadows, stutter or all three) that I personally experienced on my pc with two different cards. There are just too many. And in many of the games that had problems there was never a fix or it took almost a year. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:33 PM)
|
#55
|
|
Banned
(01-23-2013, 05:33 PM)
|
#56
And then of course the infamous fall 2011 happened when every game came out broken on AMD stuff. I knew I had made the right choice then. I have several friends who are AMD right now and they plan on bailing too due to the problems they have when we're trying to play games together. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:33 PM)
|
#57
What happens if Sony/Microsoft buys AMD and say "fuck it, were not giving you anything anymore" to the other side? They probably have contracts in place to prevent things like that from happening, but it would be hilarious if they didn't, and one of them decided that's the way to kill off the competition =p
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:34 PM)
|
#61
Ugh, those numbers make me sad and angry. They need to get things turned around now and start getting their shit together... 'cause if they fold it'll be a long day for the computer industry. I've been using AMD processors forever and to see them disappear would be terrible.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:34 PM)
|
#62
Sweet! |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:34 PM)
|
#63
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:35 PM)
|
#64
What i thought it was because of windows 8...
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:35 PM)
|
#65
them going down or not isn't going to affect the consoles, AMD isn't going to disappear, in worst case, someone will buy them and their contracts will carry over to the new owner. though this new owner might be able to negotiate new terms and change the contract somewhat which might be not as good as before. but there is another issue..
This generation all console makers own the IP to the designs of the console and the custom chips they co developed with the parties involved like IBM and AMD. These new console are using x86 architecture if rumors are true, which is licensed to AMD, seems impossible for the platform holders to own the designs because it's someone else's design, and that someone else never is selling this IP. things might get complicated down the road, this generation platform holders needed to work with AMD/IBM/NV for redesign and other revisions not for production of the chips which they owned. if something happens to AMD it can be a pretty horrible licensing nightmare with other parties involved. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:36 PM)
|
#66
I just wanted to point out that AMD's stock value has jumped %10 today.... Anyone with business sense would assume the quarterly loss information released today was better than expected.
Enough with the doom and gloom. If your a betting man/woman, i might say it's current stock value is a good entry point. I'd also say similar things about SNE... and the entire nuclear sector.
Last edited by BloodMoney; 01-23-2013 at 05:41 PM.
|
|
MeisaMcCaffrey
(01-23-2013, 05:37 PM)
|
#68
Yeah, I remember how absurd their prices were before AMD launched the 4850 card 5 years ago. They immediately dropped the price of 9800GTX. I really want AMD to stay in the game.
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(01-23-2013, 05:37 PM)
|
#69
zomb, what does it say to you about the possibility of spinning the graphics division off. as the only profitable wing of the company, do you see this as an achievement - (barely) rising above mismanagement/bloat - ? or does the meagre return on investment speak purely for their products being outclassed? would you invest?
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:38 PM)
|
#70
Last edited by 1-D_FTW; 01-23-2013 at 05:41 PM.
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(01-23-2013, 05:41 PM)
|
#73
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:42 PM)
|
#74
It's pretty weird how different experinces you can have with ATI cards. Have owned Ati cards since 2008 (4850&5850) and never have had a single problem with hardware or software. Actually HD 4850 and HD 5850 absolutely destroyed Nvidia cards when it came to price/performance. Not to mention that Nvidia cards at the time needed nuclear plant to be run and were hot as hell. Still i remember that AMD made losses during those times and Nvidia profits... really hoping that AMD survives. They must have some problems also inside when even during times they had superior products they couldn't make money.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:43 PM)
|
#75
Edit. May have misunderstood you. This is going up because the stock beat expectations. Ie. The stock is already priced in that AMD earns a penny a share. It comes out it stand two pennies a share, it goes up.
Last edited by Mr.Awesome; 01-23-2013 at 05:46 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:43 PM)
|
#76
They're probably all excited by the fact losses weren't as bad as expected. And about AMD's latest rhetoric about becoming a post-PC company. It honestly isn't to be taken as great news by PC gamers either way.
|
|
Banned from OT
(01-23-2013, 05:48 PM)
|
#83
I am not worried about intel. Thanks to chaning PC market it will keep prices under control on that side. On the GPU front having nvidia as the only game in town would be bad. If they hold on a while longer on the PC GPU side I think they will be good. All console ports will be made around modern AMD GPUs so might a lot less driver issue and they might get a bit more performance. That and with all console makers using lot of compute stuff it might speed up the adoption on the PC which AMD desperately needs to make up the gap in CPU performance. Imagine Kavari where the on board compute units do the physics and other things to level out the playing field with haswell in gaming. Also on the lower end the compute makes the Jaguar SOCs a much better solution than even against next generation Atoms. Compute and HSA could really turn the tide for AMD along with temash and kabini sucking up the high volume lower end desktops and laptops. I know at work we will be looking at the jaguar SOCs to replace many of the aging computers we have. Low power and heat are idea for what a lot of our PCs do especially in patient rooms where they are on 24/7 and don't require a ton of CPU.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:49 PM)
|
#84
And another issue is not branching out from the PC market. Even if Tegra isn't the greatest product, at least Nvidia has recognized market directions and is attempting to go with trends. AMD has just cut corners and tried to hang onto whatever PC marketshare they have and not worry about anything else. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:50 PM)
|
#86
Last edited by 2San; 01-23-2013 at 05:54 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:51 PM)
|
#87
On the one hand, I'm upset that this could lead to high prices with little competition if they go under.
On the other hand, fuck 'em. They have consistently been behind on getting the software side of things to match with their usually great hardware. Tired of waiting till day 20 on my day one purchase, to have it work as well as it should be. |
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:52 PM)
|
#89
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:52 PM)
|
#90
If AMD goes down how much will NVIDIA start charging for their GPUs?
$500+ for mid-range cards?
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:54 PM)
|
#91
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(01-23-2013, 05:56 PM)
|
#94
i wouldn't recommend them to a friend without a sternly worded disclaimer.
Last edited by ghst; 01-23-2013 at 05:59 PM.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:56 PM)
|
#96
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:56 PM)
|
#97
This is one of those fanboy topics where people exaggerate everything to favor their chosen manufacturer. I've always had multiple computers with cards from both and Nvidia is actually the one with worse bugs in drivers in the last years but it's a tradeoff because they tend to have faster updates, especially for sli profile. AMD tend to not screw up older games as much. Luckily I have one computer with a 570 sli and another with 6950 xfire.
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 05:57 PM)
|
#98
|
|
Member
(01-23-2013, 06:02 PM)
|
#100
Anyway desktop video cards is not really where they are hurting as a company. It's their failure in cpu and the impression I get from Anandtech is their gpu switching to discrete gpu on laptops has had a lot of problems that has prevented their adoption. And of course the shifting market (big fail with Llano etc)
Last edited by Shai-Tan; 01-23-2013 at 06:09 PM.
|