I hate so-called "pro" players who treat their victory like a forgone conclusion.Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo
For the most part, I've felt that. Just had a run of 4 games where I got alot of "Really, you suck dick." "You suck." "Zzzzzzz. Hurry the fuck up so I can win and leave this shit game."
Definitely. Patrick Chapin came down to gunsling at an event at one of my LGSs, dude was about as chill as can be. Politely explained to some new players why they should sleeve their cards, etc.Originally Posted by Zaraki_Kenpachi
Ya, it's kind of funny how much more humble pros are and more accepting of loses they are than the wanna be pros at most people's LGS.
I'm going to read all of this! It's so organized and well put. lolI love the Magic Internet. For example, this guy did a statistical analysis to find what the proper number of mountains to run in an all lighting bolt deck is
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0hY...b3c/edit?pli=1
It's the same thing with streams too. LSV realizes you can't win every game or people nut draw your get manascrewed or their deck stacks up better, etc. It's part of the reason I fucking HATE Paulo Vitor Damo da Rosa with a passion. He constantly whines and bitches and says how things aren't fair when he loses. He makes excuses constantly because he thinks he never deserves to lose, especially to those people.Originally Posted by Keru_Shiri
Definitely. Patrick Chapin came down to gunsling at an event at one of my LGSs, dude was about as chill as can be. Politely explained to some new players why they should sleeve their cards, etc.
I mean, who hasn't tried to put together a deck with nothing but burn spells at some point anyway? This isn't that different.
Most drug dealers are chill people. Seriously though, I respect the people who've got it but don't feel the need to flaunt. I find some of the most insufferable LGS personalities ones are those who've been at it for a long time and know the cards inside-out, but aren't particularly good players. Some of them can be really sore losers. It'd be funnier seeing grown men ragequit if it weren't so pathetic.Originally Posted by Keru_Shiri
Definitely. Patrick Chapin came down to gunsling at an event at one of my LGSs, dude was about as chill as can be. Politely explained to some new players why they should sleeve their cards, etc.
Anyway... two more days. Probably going Orzhov/Dimir Saturday, Simic Sunday. Hoping to move some Riders and Innistrad duals to complete my RTR shockland collection.
It's clear that retailers are expecting GTC to sell as well as RTR judging by the price gouging, but what are the opinions here? GTC is clearly less powerful than RTR, but will casuals care? I'm on the fence, myself; I love the art and flavor, but card-wise there's nothing that I can't pick up at a normalized price later down the road.
Yup. Yup yup yup yup yup.Seriously though, I respect the people who've got it but don't feel the need to flaunt. I find some of the most insufferable LGS personalities ones are those who've been at it for a long time and know the cards inside-out, but aren't particularly good players. Some of them can be really sore losers. It'd be funnier seeing grown men ragequit if it weren't so pathetic.
Also, Boros Reckoner may be a pick up. (If you need a playset for Standard.) Getting a lot of positive feedback on the MTGS trade pages.
Takes a little while to get used to playing with any kind of RL speed as you have to pay special attention to each step. Just make sure you learn the F key shortcuts and put a stop at each step to make sure you don't miss doing something like flashing in a blocker after they choose attacks for example.Originally Posted by God's Beard
How hard is it to get into MTG online?
It's a pity the picture doesn't have a banana peel under the dudes foot.Tragic Slip is the best card ever. Every time I kill something with it, I imagine an entire Benny Hill-esque sequence of the creature's death, complete with Yakety Sax.
...and now I will never not think this.Tragic Slip is the best card ever. Every time I kill something with it, I imagine an entire Benny Hill-esque sequence of the creature's death, complete with Yakety Sax.
When you make your account you have to spend $10 to get a starter kit that comes with some random cards and a pack of the newest core set (unless this changed). So you do start with cards. After that buying from the store is the same as buying retail but card prices on singles from other players and bots varies. Singles from in-print sets are always cheaper which is why it's bad to buy packs with the intent of opening them. The reason they're cheaper is ease of selling and more importantly drafting is very popular.Originally Posted by God's Beard
Do you start out with cards or do you have to buy them all?
Why not? Can you get singles?
It's possible but difficult. There's no official way for players to "sell" their tickets, so it has to be done through some third party. The safest way to convert MTGO winnings into cash would probably be set redemptions, and then sell the cards to a store or sell them yourself.Originally Posted by God's Beard
Do people make money online buy winning and selling tickets?
How do you sell the cards you get? Can you just drop them in some marketplace for other players? Can I just enter drafts, then pawn off all the cards I used to get more packs?It's possible but difficult. There's no official way for players to "sell" their tickets, so it has to be done through some third party. The safest way to convert MTGO winnings into cash would probably be set redemptions, and then sell the cards to a store or sell them yourself.
Well, yeah and no. It's the next step for sure. But you'll have to learn about deck building and some minor stuff like mana curves.Originally Posted by God's Beard
So I play a lot of Duels of the Planeswalkers 2012 with my friends, should the transition be fairly easy? Aside from the crap tons of money I'd have to spend.
Also, the MTGO is full of asshats.
It'll be easier than going straight from Paper -> MTGO, that's for sure. The main problem (and benefit) of MTGO is that it remembers ALL your triggers and other gameplay decisions for you, but it also means that you need to confirm each of them manually, whereas lot of paper Magic happens implicitly. Something like Second Breakfast is a nightmare in MTGO for this very reason, you can't just spread out your cards and start going off.Originally Posted by God's Beard
So I play a lot of Duels of the Planeswalkers 2012 with my friends, should the transition be fairly easy? Aside from the crap tons of money I'd have to spend.
Something as simple as "Tap 7 lands, Blaze you for 6" in MTGO becomes:
Tap 7 lands (and everytime you tap a multicolor land you have a context dialogue that asks which color you want)
Cast Blaze
Choose a target
Choose X by clicking on mana symbols in your mana pool
Wait for your opponent to pass priority
Pass priority
Resolve.
MTGO uses "tickets" as currency. There is a marketplace with plenty of bots and a smaller amount of real people looking to buy cards for these tickets which can then be used for entry fees or to buy cards and packs from other bots or players.Originally Posted by God's Beard
How do you sell the cards you get? Can you just drop them in some marketplace for other players? Can I just enter drafts, then pawn off all the cards I used to get more packs?
Make sure you take the time to learn the value of some cards by looking them up in the marketplace so you get a fair deal when you look to sell.
Bots will buy almost anything, although for the most part they deal in rares/uncommons. Most bots have a credit system so they can do amounts of less than 1 ticket (tix)Originally Posted by God's Beard
So will all my cards get sold to bots or only certain ones? Would I be able to get rid of commons and stuff?
http://www.supernovabots.com/prices_0.txt
For example, they buy Detention Sphere for .48 tickets (1 ticket is 1 USD), and sell it for .76 tickets. Meanwhile, Starcitygames sells Detention Sphere for 3 bucks. Snapcaster is a 7 ticket card, and a 20-25 dollar card in real life. In general, the less the set is drafted (which is how 90% of cards enter the card pool), the more expensive cards will be. Dark Ascension cards are more expensive in some cases online than IRL, for example, because I was only really drafted 1 pack for 3 months.
And the opposite is true also, sometimes it's more expensive on MTGO than it is in real life.You need to also realize that real life prices don't reflect the online prices. For example, this is Supernova bot (one of the larger bots) buy/sell list.
http://www.supernovabots.com/prices_0.txt
For example, they buy Detention Sphere for .48 tickets (1 ticket is 1 USD), and sell it for .76 tickets. Meanwhile, Starcitygames sells Detention Sphere for 3 bucks.
Yes. Generally speaking, and especially in constructed play, MTGO is much cheaper.You need to also realize that real life prices don't reflect the online prices. For example, this is Supernova bot (one of the larger bots) buy/sell list.
http://www.supernovabots.com/prices_0.txt
For example, they buy Detention Sphere for .48 tickets (1 ticket is 1 USD), and sell it for .76 tickets. Meanwhile, Starcitygames sells Detention Sphere for 3 bucks.
I guess that's kinda like the 1.6 vs. Source argument in a way.Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo
I think the hardercore MTG community looks down on the Duels of Planeswalker game, or that was the taunting I got when I said that's how I learned to play Magic at a LGS.
I was wondering if this was the case. I wasn't sure if the community just wanted it this way.Originally Posted by FieryBalrog
They suck at internet. Actual reason.
If MTGO wasn't an such an eyesore, I would as well. I want to play more Magic, but none of my friends are interested, I can't really get into MTGO, and the local community isn't really somewhere I want to spend my Friday night. Duels of the Planeswalkers is good but lacks deck building (trial & error) and the collecting aspect. I spose I'll have to man up and either go to FNM or embrace MTGO. I just think that WotC is missing out on a much bigger opportunity with online play. In it's current state, I don't think they are going to attract many new players.Originally Posted by WanderingWind
If I could trade my paper for MTGO versions, I would, I think. I tend to play a lot more online.
Judging from the streams I watch, there's a lot of people who get pissy if you refuse to split the prize in an 8-4 draft.Originally Posted by WanderingWind
Well, yeah and no. It's the next step for sure. But you'll have to learn about deck building and some minor stuff like mana curves.
Also, the MTGO is full of asshats.
Their marketing? I want to be on their team so bad. I could make the company millions.
The trading and card organization is a bit of a mess though.
I do wonder how people will respond if they completely overhaul the interface. There's still slowdown at times in duel of the planeswalker and I can see some people getting mad since MTGO takes like no resources. So little even that a good amount of people play it through parallels on mac.Originally Posted by Willectro
I guess that's kinda like the 1.6 vs. Source argument in a way.
I was wondering if this was the case. I wasn't sure if the community just wanted it this way.
If MTGO wasn't an such an eyesore, I would as well. I want to play more Magic, but none of my friends are interested, I can't really get into MTGO, and the local community isn't really somewhere I want to spend my Friday night. Duels of the Planeswalkers is good but lacks deck building (trial & error) and the collecting aspect. I spose I'll have to man up and either go to FNM or embrace MTGO. I just think that WotC is missing out on a much bigger opportunity with online play. In it's current state, I don't think they are going to attract many new players.
Ya, you would have to tweak the interface. There is too much missing from DotP interface to do a straight copy paste.While it doesn't look pretty, I'd rather play with the MTGO interface. You couldn't play a competitive game of Magic in DotP in it's current state although it's probably easily fixed.
The trading and card organization is a bit of a mess though.
This is why at the LGS I work at, we expanded Magic to Standard Thursdays, and Casual Saturdays. We've gotten some pretty good response from this. You might check and see if your LGS has players that meet up at other times if the online thing doesn't shake out (and I totally understand not wanting to sacrifice your weekends to nerds every week, lol)Originally Posted by Willectro
If MTGO wasn't an such an eyesore, I would as well. I want to play more Magic, but none of my friends are interested, I can't really get into MTGO, and the local community isn't really somewhere I want to spend my Friday night. Duels of the Planeswalkers is good but lacks deck building (trial & error) and the collecting aspect. I spose I'll have to man up and either go to FNM or embrace MTGO. I just think that WotC is missing out on a much bigger opportunity with online play. In it's current state, I don't think they are going to attract many new players.
A completely average friend of mine redeemed a full set of Planar Chaos about four years ago. I'm not sure how he did it (whether by winning enough cards to trade for the rest or by simply buying a copy of every card), but it amazed me, mostly because shipping all those cards to Argentina probably wasn't cheap.Oh yeah. I wonder how many people actually do that.
Tragic Slip is funny over here as well because we mostly use english card names (despite all cards being in spanish), and "slip" is how we call briefs (the underwear item); therefore, we can always imagine the creature dying due to some underwear, which is strangely hilarious.
Speaking about card nicknames, I've heard Birds of Paradise being called "pollos" (chickens) for some strange reason, as well as Groundbreaker being called "bola de pasto" because it is Ball Lightning's colorshifted cousin (which is named "Bola de rayos" over here).
| Thread Tools | |