I'm looking forward to it!Originally Posted by Sagitario
Hahaha! I was actually working on it! :D
Rm88: MOAR Erick Silva!! (and UFC).
(as in the other thread, or with: Roger Huerta, Diego Sanchez, Frank Mir, War Machine, Vitor Belfort, Kenny Florian) [though War Mahine did porn, so you can see.."eveyrthing" and there's no mystery.]
Wat?!Originally Posted by RatskyWatsky
Sagi, you need to make a new pie chart for this thread - Like you did for the last one :)
That's new to me?! I was #2?! :O.. XD!
Waiting to see how much I fell in the new one, as I started posting less in general.

Tattoo fetish...go.
Eh.
*walks out*
Pics of hot guys. Everyone is welcome to post. I also wouldn't object to pics of non hot guys. :pHot guys only?
Eh.
*walks out*
EDIT:
Also, I've seen your picture before and you're definitely hot. So either way, you belong here! :3
don't be so damn negative all the time son, damn!Hot guys only?
Eh.
*walks out*
u stay
uh...probably the same ratio of straight people to lbg people have tattoos, i would guess. i only know one gay person IRL with a tattoo.What's it with gay guys and tatoos? Finding one without one is like finding a unicorn, no pun intended.
Please note that I'm not saying you can't post photos, I just don't want this thread to be a pic dump, and definitely not one that veers into NSFW territory.
The title is fine, IMO, just a clever pun.All right, guys. Some of the photos posted were too much. Please don't post guys who are basically naked (i.e. only wearing underwear). Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
Please note that I'm not saying you can't post photos, I just don't want this thread to be a pic dump, and definitely not one that veers into NSFW territory.
Honestly, the thread balances out pretty well, and it'll go back to being just straight up discussion in a little while, I'm sure. This is just the first page, give us some time.
Yeah, I can see that now that you mention it. Hmm...Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
Maybe, if we HAVE to change it, - Gay and Bisexual Thread |OT3| The Library Is Open (I would advocate for the inclusion of Lesbian in the title)? I like that a lot.
Plus the guys had pants... pants! And that's why I also didn't want to have a L. Women remove the fun from everything.The title is fine, IMO, just a clever pun.
Honestly, the thread balances out pretty well, and it'll go back to being just straight up discussion in a little while, I'm sure. This is just the first page, give us some time.
I have a question then and Im not trying to question your choice. You say that having underware only is a no but what about the recent threads where women were wearing pretty much the same thing. There seems to never be a mod response to say this http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthre...ght=kate+uptonAll right, guys. Some of the photos posted were too much. Please don't post guys who are basically naked (i.e. only wearing underwear). Also, I think the title is encouraging people to turn this into a hot guy picture dump thread, which is probably not a good idea, so I'd really prefer to change it into something else in order to avoid that. I'll let you guys give some ideas for that.
Please note that I'm not saying you can't post photos, I just don't want this thread to be a pic dump, and definitely not one that veers into NSFW territory.
I'm just curious where the line is drawn for male and females. Either way I can slow down on posting men.
I like that title.Originally Posted by RatskyWatsky
Yeah, I can see that now that you mention it. Hmm...
Maybe, if we HAVE to change it, - Gay and Bisexual Thread |OT3| The Library Is Open (I would advocate for the inclusion of Lesbian in the title)? I like that a lot.
I don't get your pun, bi-kun. ._.The title is fine, IMO, just a clever pun.
That's a good point, plus guys in underwear are everywhere on store's windows. I had even posted a pic from a major department store's showroom where it was all leather and bdsm themed. (I got a leather pup mask)
I'm just curious where the line is drawn for male and females. Either way I can slow down on posting men.
The thread is marked NSFW in the title, so that helps.I have a question then and Im not trying to question your choice. You say that having underware only is a no but what about the recent threads where women were wearing pretty much the same thing. There seems to never be a mod response to say this http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthre...ght=kate+upton
I'm just curious where the line is drawn for male and females. Either way I can slow down on posting men.
The gay threads are crazier and more predictable than the Sonic Cycle. Starts out with Foolery and fuckery, borderline inappropriate pics or pics we know that would end up locking our thread and to make future threads, Body shaming from both ends, awkward sex stories, Growing and "loving" together with gifs, silent thread for weeks, gay cliche talk, and then repeat. And still not enough lesbians nor Trans people to my knowledge here. I feel like some of our past behavior in the threads alienates people form posting sometimes. Certainly not saying all us gay gaffers do of course, nor is there the need to point fingers. I know we want our fun, but we can do better, seriously.
Edit:
Cosigned. I think it should be changed and adding the Inclusion of Lesbians would make the thread more inviting and bring in new and great posters. More Inclusion, less exclusivity. It's been 3 OT's already and we haven't learned a thingOriginally Posted by RatskyWatsky
Maybe, if we HAVE to change it, - Gay and Bisexual Thread |OT3| The Library Is Open (I would advocate for the inclusion of Lesbian in the title)? I like that a lot.
And we were told to tone down the pics and explicit talk in the previous thread.It depends on what you consider safe, the other thread had plenty of sex talk and guys in underwear. If that's NSFW, then it needed to be marked too.
The alternative is we don't have a thread so it's probably best we just play by the rules.
This isn't a bar but a thread for issues pertaining to a common minority. I don't think it's best we start fracturing into smaller and smaller threads.Why is that mean? Like in real life, I don't want women in a male gay/bisex bar.
Also, that's a silly exclusionary look.
| Thread Tools | |