QP3 said:

Honestly, I don't think it is that bad. I still say this: if you go into it expecting an AC game, and nothing more, then you will at least enjoy it. It feels like it's console predecessors.

Click to expand...

CrunchinJelly said:

Liberation HD was rated in Brazil in July for 360/PS3:

http://portal.mj.gov.br/Classificac...JogoForm.do?select_action=&tbjogo_codigo=4979

Click to expand...

Lesiroth said:

By the way, did they ever bother patching Liberation after release? I remember a lot of complaints about how buggy it was, not sure if it remained that way.

Click to expand...

Gskyace said:

Personally, I think It's a shame for Kotaku.That's twee.

In their article and replies, how they "understand" the NDAs, is just fun to read.
It's like they are totally innocent. : D But actually, if they've signed the NDA, they should have keep it anyway. So now they want the news covered, the page view growed, with no responsibility taken. That's weak.

If I've signed the NDA, we would have followed it anyway we could. I won't even retweet the leak because it's potentially break the rules. But this time, I could say the leak is from the Ubisoft staff, and I don't sign the NDA or any agreement with Ubisoft. Then it's free for me to report and post.

So Kotaku should have quoted the A9VG and Neogaf rightly, like other media.Please don not use "somebody", which sounds quite evil. XDDD It's a basic for media to at least quote right, isn't it?

Click to expand...