Marvel
could never
There are shadows, just none under the soldiers feet.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Two *Off-screen* High Resolution Images of Battlefield 4 Running on Xbox One
- Thread starter Wishmaster92
- Start date
There are shadows, just none under the soldiers feet.
bodeiseifer
Member
not impressed, looks like a 360 game
Wishmaster92
Member
This is what i'm guessing too.
Looking at it though ... that can't be real ...
They have 8GB of RAM to work with! How can textures still be so low resolution??? HOW?!!?
But that is a .. long ... way off from this
Even the low setting shot ...
5GB. 3 for the OS.
Askherserenity
Member
How can it look so bad? Just has to be these screens right? It'll be awful if the PS4 version looks just as bad.
Kinect is not a requirement for this game. However if you enable the Kinect leaning and Kinect cannot see you, you are going to get an errror. What is surprising about this?
Regarding the image quality, Im not saying BF4 is going to look great, but why don't we wait untill direct feed images are released before shitting on it.
Regarding the image quality, Im not saying BF4 is going to look great, but why don't we wait untill direct feed images are released before shitting on it.
So, are thoses shadows or baked lightnings? (honest question)
For us less learned people can you circle on the picture where you see it and post it?
Haha, subtle.A rather obvious take on that shot.
Interfectum
Member
When you have Steam Machines outputting better quality graphics at the same price or less only then will the truth be fully revealed.
This could either be "Damn its ugly" or "Damn that is way better than we thought." Either way, the launch should be interesting to see.
Yeah wtf is this shit?
I was thinking the same...
qa_engineer
Member
Despite PS4 being more powerful than Xbox, I don't think we're going to see a much better product. I think DICE had enough time to port the game to both platforms running at minimum capacity. I would imagine their next game will show more of the bells & whistles.
For someone like me who is trying to improve his posture that would be pretty neat.
marlowesghost
Member
I dont know how much can be gleaned from these photos, but it just looks awful.
silver.tongue
Member
This is unnaceptable. Really.
It actually wouldn't surprise me if title updates that are released post-launch will shine and buff any areas of the game they couldn't get done before the game has to go Gold.
Quick question, has AMD said anything about mantle targeting next gen consoles as well? Would be interesting if the consoles see a marginal performance boost if we do get Mantle support, if that is the case.
smarmyjerkface
Banned
The whole season?!
WeAreStarStuff
Member
I know off screen photos can be hit or miss, and that sometimes off screen actually makes games looks better, but this....this looks current gen as hell.
GAF is amazing.
GAF is amazing.
retrobeans
Neo Member
This is exactly what the game looked like when I played it at Eurogamer. Really fun, but graphically unimpressive.
Regardless, have it pre-ordered anyway!
Regardless, have it pre-ordered anyway!
Risk Breaker
Member
I wouldn't.
A rather obvious take on that shot.
Perfect, I love you guys, I've been laughing my ass off in this thread.
GAF is literally worse than cancer and war crimes.
2dshmuplover
Banned
Well that's absolutely not true for a start as an interview with Andrew Goossen (system architect) reveals the layered upscaling tech that always allows for 1080p HUD elements.
Woah I thought this was a joke. LOL I am on my phone I zoomed in on the pic and saw that message on screen.
Kinect seems like it is something half baked, and Microsoft will not stop pushing this thing like it is the best thing since sliced bread.
cookie-monster
Member
Looks even lower resolution than the low resolution of the photograph.
The most obvious aliasing is on the window boundaries of the top left building in the first shot.
VicDaMoan03
Member
I like the look/design of that map! It reminds me of Bad Company.
PC version will look like that downsampled
That's not even a proper comparison... you are using two games that don't even have anywhere near the scale or player counts of Battlefield. Last of Us is pretty linear, and pretty much a closed environment compared to BF4 which makes rendering pretty graphics much easier.
GameAddict411
Member
oh...i thought it will be similar to PC version of battlefield where the HUD size decrease if you increase the resolution.
Pristine_Condition
Member
Whoa, whoa, whoa!!! Let's not make any wild statements before we get to for ourselves.
Well TLoU is on 7 year old $200 hardware, not a $500 dollar next gen console....so....I suppose that could be considered far more important than the difference in scale.
fluffydelusions
Member
Pristine_Condition
Member
So, what does that make CGI?
Realer than real life.
We're also looking at Alpha builds which could be far from polished. This game will likely look better at release for both consoles.
People judged BF3 on console the same way during betas and the like, and the game ended up releasing with higher res texture packs. The 360 version had a massive HD texture install that was something like 7GB, the beta build was just over 1GB.
Something tells me the builds used during shows and whatnot are not using full installs with all assets.