He was online/logged in via the system, but not in Xbox Live playing a game.
But he wasn't online, a ban effectively cuts you out of every way to conect to internet, you can log in except to the local profile which is offline.
He was online/logged in via the system, but not in Xbox Live playing a game.
Or Wii U
Or PC
???
But we don't have enough information to draw from this.No, the issue is that though it might not be system wide DRM, it will be game to gane DRM, including stuff the single player portion.
How do you know how a ban works on Xbox One?But he wasn't online, a ban effectively cuts you out of every way to conect to internet, you can log in except to the local profile which is offline.
What are you finding insane? That some publishers can choose to stay online only?
We've seen(dumb) examples of it with Final Fight: Double Impact and Bionic Commando Rearmed 2. The only shit part about that was not knowing ahead of time to not support it.
because Sony won't allow it but MS will?
Honestly, this cop out kind of pisses me off. It's their console. Microsoft and Sony should be able to dictate that if a game has a single player element, it should be allowed to be played offline. Sure, Simcity doesn't, but that's EA.But we've already known it was up to the publisher haven't we ? I'm just waiting to see which publisher will commit a PR self-destruction but I thought this was known.
How big did the Simcity thread get. People hate that shit.Based on everything else wrong with Ghosts. Who knows.
Also why would this thread go 20 pages off the realization that publishers can do whatever they want in regards to online/offline access.
The PS4 -and- X360 do not require online. I'm still 50% in the camp that it's just an incomplete patch.
because Sony won't allow it but MS will?
I mean that in a more broad way really. Sony and MSFT have things to fix but MSFT's issues are bigger.
I want to be able to get one without BS.
Currently I'd have to rate this a 4/10 shitstorm but IF this a trend where ONE games have online only DRM where their PS4 counterparts don't = Catastrophic Or IF the day 1 patch doesn't completely or successfully remove DRM then crank the shitsorm dial to 11 and head for a mountain bunker.Is this a catastrophic situation though?
If MS ruled the world
Imagn that
I'd control all Xbones, I love em love em baby
Xbox Live gold and fanboys
Could it be, if you could
be mine, we'd both be online
If MS ruled the world
Still gaming for today, in
these last days and times
But why require it on Xbone and not the PS4?
Ok, I just found a picture of Call of Duty: Ghosts Xbox One packaging.
It does NOT say offline play is enabled.
This doesn't confirm anything one way or the other, of course, but there it is.
It's just FUD until you be more specific man.I mean that in a more broad way really. Sony and MSFT have things to fix but MSFT's issues are bigger.
imagn.
24 hour check in allegedly kicked in.
That is both promising and sketchy as hell. Response indicates this is abnormal (good). The fact that it is abnormal isn't exactly reassuring as he has no idea why that would be happening...
24 hour check in allegedly kicked in.
I find it insane that Microsoft would allow the absolute biggest third party game coming to XBO - which they have a partnership on - to have such DRM checks on Xbox One, while there are none on PS4.
It would be a catastrophic issue, no two ways about it. It suggests not only that it must therefore be must simpler to implement such fuck ups on XBO, but that devs are already starting to right from launch. For games that demonstrably should never require it.
Again, I don't believe this shit is true (or at least we're missing crucial details), but if it were, it's is fucking bad.
To be fair, the back of the XB1 boxes is missing a lot of detail compared to the PS4 ones. It doesnt even list resolutions. I've noticed this with Forza, Ryse and DR3.
Yuck. More teasing.
I imagine it's not a big deal if both Albert and Major Nelson don't know why it's happening.
It's just FUD until you be more specific man.
Then how would these bans be reversible? Obviously there is still internet access although restricted/cut off from the users end.But he wasn't online, a ban effectively cuts you out of every way to conect to internet, you can log in except to the local profile which is offline.
Not the same thing.Sony allows it. What do you think the MMO and F2Ps are?
To be fair, the back of the XB1 boxes is missing a lot of detail compared to the PS4 ones. It doesnt even list resolutions. I've noticed this with Forza, Ryse and DR3.
Does Penello actually know anything about the product he's reponsible for?
no
he's looking into it.
Does Penello actually know anything about the product he's reponsible for?
Isn't he console banned, not Xbox Live banned?
imagn.
This.
Hmm, why would the Xbox games not list resolutions or offline modes, but the PS4 version would?
I just can't think of a reason for those omissions...
It's one of either two things:
- Microsoft can control your offline play functionality through a ban system.
- Offline play can be disabled at the publisher/developer's will.
Either one is bad.
Microsoft either restricted everything the user can do, this gives them unprecedented control over "your" console.
Or publishers and developers can choose not to enable offline play without an internet connection/connection to the game network.
I don't if that would better or worse.Or the console ban just disables your system. I don't think this is a DRM thing. People expected the console ban to just apply to accessing live, but I think what we are seeing is that it disables all features of the console.
Makes more sense than Microsoft waiting until launch to remove the DRM. They would have removed that months ago. The need for the Day One patch is just because they knew they would need that extra window of time to finish the OS.
How do you know how a ban works on Xbox One?
The fact that Albert and Major are "looking into it" just confirms to me DRM is alive and well (depending on pubs). Or XBL bans block offline and online play. Either way thats fucking horrible.
Console == X-box Live access banned.
Console =!= X-box Live ACCOUNT banned.
Big difference.
His Live account is in good standing, but they (temp)-banned his access to Live for the time being.
And unless he shows that the single-player throws up a "no, you can't play offline, you need to be signed into X-box Live" and the same for the versus mode, I wouldn't panic just yet. He may be wording it in a way that "oh, I can't play X-box Live " instead of "Oh, I can't play the game. "
(Of course, he could also be saying that his 360 copy since he owns that IIRC is also banned, which would make sense since his access to X-box Live with that account right now is revoked.)
I figure not delving too deep into specifics is what keeps him safe from detection. Though to be perfectly honest I agree, it would be really nice to have some damn specifics on these kinds of things.
Best 'Bone owners can hope for right now is that it's another situation like the indie games thing, where CBOAT might be sitting on outdated/incorrect info. (Assuming the worst-case assumption is the correct one, anyway)
The fact that Albert and Major are "looking into it" just confirms to me DRM is alive and well (depending on pubs). Or XBL bans block offline and online play. Either way thats fucking horrible.
This.
It's neither. I just want to confirm before I post anything, it's that simple.