I'd give him a bit more time before they hire the head of McDonalds to run Nintendo.
They should have established a strong network for the Wii U launch last year. After years of Xbox Live and PSN you'd think they'd know what players expect when it comes to online networking.To be frank, no. He's done some great things for the company. They just need to market the WiiU better and improve their online.
Iwata became the head of Nintendo after the release of the GameCube. Since then, we've had the release of the DS, Wii, 3DS, and Wii U. The former two were considered massive successes right out of the gate while the latter have struggled. While Iwata did manage to turn around the 3DS, the Wii U is still hanging in there.As much as I like Mr. Iwata as he seems like a nice down to earth guy, every since he took Nintendo's reins around the time before Gamecube launched I believe, the main consoles NEVER got a strong foothold on third party support again and the primary focus was always its own IPs, plagued with delays and the like.
Think about this: He oversaw the launches of the DS and Wii - two of the most successful consoles of all time. His only real failure was the Wii U. Does he really need to step down solely because of that?
This is what will happen. We'll wax nostalgiac for the days when Iwata was doing Directs wearing a giant Luigi hat and the 3DS was flourishing with one of Nintendo's best lineups in years.Originally Posted by Servbot24
If he does step down, I would bet his successor will be someone GAF dislikes more than Iwata. I.e. someone who does what the investors want them to do.
That's just how cruel the business world is. You fuck up once and you're out.
Think about this: He oversaw the launches of the DS and Wii - two of the most successful consoles of all time. His only real failure was the Wii U. Does he really need to step down solely because of that?
Ken Kutaragi did wonders for the Playstation brand. Where is he now after the PS3? No one knows - or cares.
This isn't about whether games like him. It's whether he's been a good CEO at maximizing shareholder value, and he has not been. If Nintendo wants to not be held accountable for profits for the sake of tradition or whatever justifies their stubborn strategy, then they should go private. But as long as their public and owned by thousands of shareholders like myself, his only core job is to return value to shareholders. And he has not simply down a poor job, but he's fully squandered the amazing success of the Wii -- so it should not even be a quesiton whether or not he should step down. Of course he should.
Is that suppose to be a bad thing?Originally Posted by Servbot24
If he does step down, I would bet his successor will be someone GAF dislikes more than Iwata. I.e. someone who does what the investors want them to do.
I thought the point of a company was to make money, not waste it on useless squandering.
Unless you're referring to the phone crap, I don't really care. Nintendo wouldn't stop making games for handhelds/consoles if that's what you're suggesting.
I don't think that taking at most an hour out of a week (maybe) is hurting anything...Originally Posted by PetrCobra
No. But he should do less Iwata Asks and more meetings with the marketing department.
IA is a fan service and there clearly are no enough fans who'd even buy a fucking Wii U, so why make such a service just for them. Priorities, Iwata.
I think Boards at billion dollar multi-national companies are the "what have you done for me lately?" sort. Plus I think Iwata used up his "Wii/DS good will" the last two losing fiscal years.
Think about this: He oversaw the launches of the DS and Wii - two of the most successful consoles of all time. His only real failure was the Wii U. Does he really need to step down solely because of that?
It'll be interesting.
He's fucked up the Wii U in every imaginable way possible. That's not how you remain the CEO of most companies. And when I said one thing, I meant between consoles and handhelds. He managed to salvage the 3DS because there's no direct competition other than another piece of hardware that was even more poorly conceived. In the console business where he has actual competition, he's fallen on his face repeatedly. The Wii, like it or not, was a fad. He failed with the GC and he's repeating that with the Wii U. How many chances do you give him?He did the Wii as well. He saved the 3DS.
I'm not a huge fan of his and would like to see him go in the near future, but to say he did "one thing right" is asinine.
Unless they get someone in who is completely willing to revamp Nintendo philosophy from the ground up, there's not really anything to be achieved from firing Iwata.
Nintendo almost always makes money. If you're worried about companies losing money, look at Sony and Microsoft.Is that suppose to be a bad thing?
I thought the point of a company was to make money, not waste it on useless squandering.
And sure, for investors, a quick buck is always appealing. But it's for the CEO to keep the long-term health of the company in mind. Otherwise they should just have investors rubberstamp all the decisions for companies and cut out the CEO middleman, right?
But just getting rid of Iwata wouldn't change much, there's probably a bunch of people that would need to go before Nintendo's philosophies are totally gone, which is what most Gaffers want to see happen and for Nintendo to become a MS/Sony clone.
Same goes for Reggie, people hate him, I can see why, but he's just doing his job, and he's good at it. It's like people expect him to say "Yes, our system is selling like shit and it's not a worthy investment, so don't buy it. Oh, by the way, 3DS!"
No, they just need to give NOA their own independence and stop trying to control all rams...Nintendo's investors meeting is in January I believe and obviously things aren't looking good. I know we still have Smash U, Zelda, Mario Kart and DKC looming but what about the larger picture? Do you guys think Satoru Iwata's time should be over and another, more core player-minded prez should step in to fill his shoes?
That's how things go in the Western world.Originally Posted by Poetic.Injustice
That's just how cruel the business world is. You fuck up once and you're out.
You fuck up once, you get a golden parachute and you move on to the next corporation/bank to tank.
In the Eastern world when you fuck up once, you get a green light to keep making awful Final Fantasy games.
Overall he has done an amazing job, I dont think one hiccup warrants a change.
He has failed with the Wii U, true. But many of the "ideas" you vaguely refer to are not failed ideas, at all. They've been very successful for Nintendo. Iwata's execution this time around, unfortunately, has been way off the mark. You don't throw the baby out with the bath water.Originally Posted by zomgbbqftw
Yes. He has failed with the Wii U and instead of changing the company's tactics he has persisted with failed ideas.
Yeah. The 3DS will keep Nintendo (and hopefully Iwata) afloat.Iwata pushed Nintendo to unforeseen heights. He was the President when the Wii became a hit and the DS sold 150 million. The 3DS is looking great, the Wii U has struggled.
Overall he has done an amazing job, I dont think one hiccup warrants a change.
Now if both 3DS and Wii U struggled, than it'd be a different story. But 3DS is going strong. So I'd say he'll be alright for now.
Yes, the Wii U was a huge swing and a miss, and a disaster by any metric, but I don't think firing Iwata is likely yet. He still did make Nintendo home consoles relevant again. He will be given another chance, I believe. If the next home console is a failure on the scale of the Wii U, oh yea, he's a goner, but he still has one more shot, imo.
| Thread Tools | |