Gunslinger and Samurai assasins......mmmmmmmm
Barring that I'd be up for Meiji restoration Japan (think the Last Samurai), boxer era China, or England and France during the French Revolution. Whatever they do I do not want a American setting or anything remotely modern day.
That would get awkward real fast.
Therefore, Ubi won't do it.
Asia. Either Samurais or Ninjas or both. I hope no-one suggests an old western setting, as it will be a shit game when it is compared to RDR. Ubisoft can't match that Rockstar quality unfortunately.
Hopefully they don't. Feudal Japan has been done to death in videogames already. Let's do something that hasn't been done as much. French Revolution, Medieval or Early Modern China, etc, let's do some of these places.Originally Posted by casmith07
Feudal Japan makes too much sense.
Therefore, Ubi won't do it.
AC4 part 3 will be a Edward/Haytham/Connor crossover and tie up the Kenway's story. In the same formula AC1, AC2, AC:B and AC:R was with Altair and Ezio.
AC5 in 2016 with a new protagonist.
I could see them not doing it to stick to Desmond's ancestors, but they could try to squeeze in a little bit of Asian heredity in there.Originally Posted by casmith07
Feudal Japan makes too much sense.
Therefore, Ubi won't do it.
Edit: also, you're crazy if you don't think AC4 will have spinoffs. It's already subtitled.
With no modern day. The metagame is actually backwards in time, in Atlantis.
Downfall of Ming Dynasty.
Not really. They came as traders in the early days of the Raj. The Mughals were the oppressive local rulers that had invaded the place a while back. The locals themselves were no angels and rife with superstition and conflict. Add to that the French, Portuguese and some other players. Basically nobody's right and you have some absolutely massive cities with great architecture like Delhi. I think it would be the perfect setting.That sounds fantastic.
EDIT: Actually, the British imperialists as bad guys again? hmmmm
But Ubisoft would probably mess it up. The thought of it would likely be better than execution
That would be so epic.
I've only played the first so forgive my ignorance. How can they set the next game in a time before assassins or templars even existed?
Play 4 and keep up with the non Edward stuff
Abstergo don't give a fuuuuck about your historical accuracy
It's done very well actually
If they do this, they need to take a leaf outta AC4. I want to feel like a viking, not an Assassin that happens to be around Vikings. Hoping for some GTA style variety in the world, I hope they abandon last-gen but I'm not holding my breath.You've got an open world and sailing infrastructure already built on the current AC engine. The obvious choice is medieval Scandinavia. What to do with the story? Don't care, whatever they come up with would be worth it to play as Trygir Othriksson, taking a longboat upriver to pillage some pre-templar settlements.
Year after is Osiris ACV
After that maybe Osiris spinoffs
Then new location
So probably years away before any new location that isn't Pirates or Egypt!
No way, ACIV's great but after 30-50 hours of doing the same thing three hundred times (take out ships, jump onto random island to collect collectible) it's definitely 100% played out (and I really love ACIV).Originally Posted by famousmortimer
Can't we just stay here forever as pirates? It's SOOOO GOOD now.
I actually think next year's game will be another Pirate game and an ACIV: Subtitle spinoff since they like to milk things a few games. But it's gonna be a bit staler next time I think.
| Thread Tools | |