Ghosts looks like a game from 2008 that runs like a game from 2014.Need data on how Ghosts performs on a PC that is 10 years old.
Probably on par or better than something a person put together within the past year.
I haven't played a FPS since Black Ops 1/some of MW2 but I got BF4 due to the hype and wanting a game for launch. I'm not seeing what's so amazing about this game after hours of playing it.Originally Posted by SeanR1221
I enjoyed it for about 4 hours. Then I became extremely bored :/
When it works, Bf4 is so much better, it's not even funny.
Battlefield 4's Team Deathmatch mode is better than Call of Duty: Ghosts'.3. I know conquest is the big mode for the game, but I just want to play a TDM every now and then. The maps just don't work well with the mode.
Maybe the smaller scale FPS is just the game for me. I enjoy Halo, Blacklight Retribution on PS4 is pretty decent for a F2P game, and the older CODs when I used to play them.
Anyways, is COD Ghost REALLY that bad if you just want a decent online FPS?
And I enjoy Domination on BF4 for a nice change of pace every once in a while. It's great for gun progression and the maps are the perfect size for infantry gameplay.Battlefield 4's Team Deathmatch mode is better than Call of Duty: Ghosts'.
Take that as you will.
I think Battlefields smaller modes are genuinely great now. I love Domination especially and it's a nice change of pace from Conquest/Rush/Obliteration. I just find the combat much more satisfying in comparison to BF3.Battlefield 4's Team Deathmatch mode is better than Call of Duty: Ghosts'.
Take that as you will.
Yes, the feel of the weapons, the recoil, the sound effects, hit feedback, all that feels much better than than in Ghosts.I think Battlefields smaller modes are genuinely great now. I love Domination especially and it's a nice change of pace from Conquest/Rush/Obliteration. I just find the combat much more satisfying in comparison to BF3.
People who are their fan base probably don't go to rate the game. They are busy playing the game, and from my experience, don't go online to look a bunch of reviews. I actually enjoy Ghosts, and it took me a little while to get use to the game. It plays different from the others in that maps feel more open with all the entry points. It feels leaps better than MW3, a little better than BLOPS but not as good as MW2 and BLOPS2. The guns feel similar, but not unsatisfying. BLOPS had an issue where all the weapons just sounded awful to me. The biggest compliant, as with all CODs, is the spawning system. People feel like they get killed from behind so often, because the game literally spawns people 10 feet behind you.Activision has an interesting definition of fan appreciation.
It's a perfectly fine FPS. People complain because it's not the same bullshit that mw2 and blops2 allowed with run and gunning and too small maps.I haven't played a FPS since Black Ops 1/some of MW2 but I got BF4 due to the hype and wanting a game for launch. I'm not seeing what's so amazing about this game after hours of playing it.
The massive maps and amazing graphics were cool at first, but then I started noticing the problems with the game.
1. Hit detection- Sometimes it seems like I'm clearly aiming at someone and not getting hit markets? I'm getting hit markers but not doing damage?
2. Hard to see people at times- The maps is just filled with things that makes it hard to see anything (teammates that don't spot makes this even worse) and I just see a bunch of people setting up a house and waiting while not playing the objective.
3. I know conquest is the big mode for the game, but I just want to play a TDM every now and then. The maps just don't work well with the mode.
Maybe the smaller scale FPS is just the game for me. I enjoy Halo, Blacklight Retribution on PS4 is pretty decent for a F2P game, and the older CODs when I used to play them.
Anyways, is COD Ghost REALLY that bad if you just want a decent online FPS?
No it isn't. BF4 is garbage. DICE completely butchered this game. I loved BF2, BC2 and to a lesser extent, BF3. BF4 is horrible. Ghosts is leagues more enjoyable.Battlefield 4's Team Deathmatch mode is better than Call of Duty: Ghosts'.
Take that as you will.
it really is.Originally Posted by wsoxfan1214
No it isn't. BF4 is garbage. DICE completely butchered this game. I loved BF2, BC2 and to a lesser extent, BF3. BF4 is horrible. Ghosts is leagues more enjoyable.
Thanks for buying...Next title will be worse, as they have been.The game is absolute fucking garbage. I regret my purchase wholeheartedly.
Critics were far too kind to the multiplayer.
If MW3 was available on PS4 I would be playing that instead.Originally Posted by oflaherty01
People who are their fan base probably don't go to rate the game. They are busy playing the game, and from my experience, don't go online to look a bunch of reviews. I actually enjoy Ghosts, and it took me a little while to get use to the game. It plays different from the others in that maps feel more open with all the entry points. It feels leaps better than MW3, a little better than BLOPS but not as good as MW2 and BLOPS2. The guns feel similar, but not unsatisfying. BLOPS had an issue where all the weapons just sounded awful to me. The biggest compliant, as with all CODs, is the spawning system. People feel like they get killed from behind so often, because the game literally spawns people 10 feet behind you.
My biggest complaint is that I can't get into the single player. I liked the MW campaigns for some reason, maybe it was Cpt. Price. This seems like it ramps up way too fast early on. They don't give that much backstory into the conflict and the writing is really corny in a bad way. I have not completed the story, as I just cant seem to get into it.
Only care about MP, but my feeling is that infinity ward's iterations are getting shittier and shittier (MW3 felt terrible to me, ghost is still largely worse), while treyarch has been doing better (liked blops1, really enjoyed blops2). Looking forward to next November.I appreciate that Treyarch tried new things with Black Ops 2, even if it didn't totally work and the MP was overloaded with killstreaks. Hope they can do something special with the series when their turn comes again.
Ghosts feels like a step back in a way that doesn't feel too hot.
Spot on. Nothing I had read in any reviews informed me of how pathetic (and technically inept) ghost MP is. would also have been nice to know BF4 PC was broken out of the gate...Originally Posted by commedieu
Although, feeling the same way with BF4 pc :\ rushed product is rushed. The problem is the media, they sugar coat all the previews/reviews FIRST LOOK bullshit, then go silent as a peep when it ships. Its not like the good ole days when you could see direct feed footage and assume thats how the game will perform.. you almost have to wait for all the day 1 suckers to buy, then check the forums, then gauge your purchase on that.
You're weird. I have both games and they are broken as fuck. Playing with a good squad works wonders though. I cannot put any of these companies over each other for the crap they put us through but I will play what I like. So I bought the games and I play them.Well, I sure as hell won't be buying their overpriced, highway-robbery map packs.
I'm all about Battlefield 4, already have Premium on that, just waiting for them to patch that game more, then Titanfall, next year.
My money is going to EA. They're making the games that I want to play, despite their business practices.
Damn. It's true from my experience so far. I'm not getting shot immediately on spawn nor am I getting shot from behind all the time. BF just need to get that damage bug worked out.Battlefield 4's Team Deathmatch mode is better than Call of Duty: Ghosts'.
Take that as you will.
Yeah infinity ward is a shell of its former self. A joyless husk you might say.Originally Posted by Jawmuncher
It's funny how Treyarch basically owns the franchise now.
Use to be the reverse where people saw that logo and expected a "lesser version".
Now everyone want's treyarch on the box since they at least are competent to what the fans want mostly.
That's the kick. He says the fans are showing heir love, but what he really means is it sold well. Fan feedback online is overly negative (metacritic, most forums being majority negative), but I guess it's the silent majority of buyers who don't delve any deeper than the well know when they make their purchases.I liked the campaign, but that multiplayer.. they really messed things up this time around. From what I've seen the overall fan response has been negative.
| Thread Tools | |
