Lol I had a guy rant on a server today about how the netcode problem was bullshit. He demand people define netcode for him, then got mad when no one would. He then said we all crash because we have shitty computers, I would have responded but My shitty computer crashed after that. :/Originally Posted by Vigilant Walrus
Is the netcode really as bad as some people say? Worse than BF3?
Actually charging $110 if you want the real BF experience and if your a sucker like me.I'm thinking about returning this game. Multiplayer had it's fair share of issues and my single player save was corrupted halfway through. I gave up. This was the first and last BF game I'll buy as long as it's developed by DICE.
Frankly, I think there should be some sort of legal action against EA and DICE. This isn't a one off hiccup, this is a pattern of releasing games that are simply unplayable and charging people $60 for what is essentially a glorified beta.
Just fix this shit so that you can move on to making Battlfront...
You think battlefront won't face these issues? All the previous battlefield games have had shit like this. But this time it's just worse.What a fucking disaster. Totally embarrassing.
Just fix this shit so that you can move on to making Battlfront...
EA is the problem. And, IMO, Dice is working on too many things at once.
Regardless, real lunatics are those who will be preordering EA games in the future after getting absolutely torched on this game. I've been buying EA games since 1986, and this is the worst crap I have ever seen. This includes Ultima Ascension (1999/2000 or so), a game so bad they had to ship new CDs to all the owners because the game ran so poorly. But at least it kind of worked.
BF4 isn't just borderline theft, it is theft. EA really needs to compensate people, or they are going to get sued.
I'm a huge battlefield fan but the day when they announce battlefield 5, I'll be the first person who completely ignores it.
QA might not sign off on a release and it might still be released.Industry really needs some type of independent QA laws or something for a baseline for craftsmanship. This fucking shit is despicable.
Let me tell a story about a few years back to give some impressions how this works.
I work in a company making some software millions of people use daily. This particular version had a fixed release date due to a PR stunt event in the hometown of one of our competitors.
QA tested the release candidate for the release on that date and _rejected_ it for release, it was too damn buggy. Management overruled them and we still released. Both QA and us developers were embarrassed about it. We did eventually fix the issues in follow-up patch releases, but it still left a bad taste in our mouths.
So blaming QA here is likely pointing the finger in the wrong direction. This is almost certainly a management decision, triggered by a fixed release date.
| Thread Tools | |