Ninja Scooter
Member
See, this where I am getting confused. People say that MS "funding" a project is not moneyhatting, but if Microsoft's funding keeps the title off the Sony/Nintendo platforms, what does it make it then?
Still just "funding"? Sounds weird to me....
Moneyhatting isn't anything. It has no real definition. At the end of the day all of these deals, whether it's funding the development, or co-marketing, or DLC, involve some sort of monetary agreement. Yes, it's not necessarily a hat made out of money being sent from one party to the other, but it's all the same shit. And very few (if any) of us are privy to the actual agreements between them to know what was and wasn't funded directly, or what the nature of the contracts were, so arguing about them to try and make one company look better than the other seems silly.