keltickennedy
Member
Microsoft thought they knew a lot of things....just saying.
Yes and no. I see where Pacht is coming from but I believe there will be enough demand to have devices dedicated to playing games.But things will change for sure.It's bound of happen eventually
Agreed. I don't know about his reasoning, but I think you have to be willfully ignorant to look at the available evidence and claim that the console market is fundamentally healthy.
Good news everyone, consoles are here to last.
I really think things like game streaming is the future, but it's still early and the sloooowww upgrading of internet to our houses is going to dictate when this happens. Is it a decade away? Two? Three? That's the tough question.
Considering assholes are spawning Meteors in my PS3 GTA Online, you're probably right. I'd just assume the process would have a lower barrier to entry, being that most (android) phones are incredibly easy to mess around with.
How much will we care about graphics after that? I'd argue not much longer after two or three generations at the latest.
I mean Imagine just hooking up your iPhone to your television and playing a $3 version of GTA:VII.
Now, if you have a Chromecast stick or a Roku box, you can. So why do we buy consoles?
This fucked up graphics race. That's about the only explanation necessary. It's unsustainable. It's always been unsustainable. So let's see how many more years the industry can withstand ye' graphic hogs (not you specifically)
Eh...
That sounds like the death of the console to me, sorry. Pachter is basically saying that in the part you bolded.
I really think things like game streaming is the future, but it's still early and the sloooowww upgrading of internet to our houses is going to dictate when this happens. Is it a decade away? Two? Three? That's the tough question.
I think he has one of those jobs that if he gets something right other business's will lose money so as long as he keeps getting things wrong its good for other business's so he keeps his job xD.Always wrong and still getting paid how does he do it?
Always wrong and still getting paid how does he do it?
But even when streaming becomes mainstream, there will still at least be one big console available for people who prefer non-streaming. It's a market that will probably never go away.
We live in a world now where we can't seem to grasp that two different things can co-exist.
Everything is "THIS is going to die and be replaced with this". It's the same with cameras "Phones will kill compact cameras!". No they won't. They will take a chunk of the market. But traditional cameras will always be around because there will always be a market for them, even if it's smaller than before.
The technology press need to stop with this "kill" shit and learn that choice is a real thing. Markets can co-exist.
Well he is right....in japan!
Now that is pure pwnage.
A smaller market with perpetually rising production cost to sell to a shrinking base. Hence "healthy"
Apart from that, it's not just a hardware thing by a long shot, since both new consoles are being sold approximately at cost or for a slight profit. It's a fucked up production values race that raises questions about the future of AAA console games, and that includes a lot more than just graphics. You have professional voice acting, licensed and orchestrated music, large teams of writers, enormous advertising campaigns... Graphics factor into that, of course, but they're hardly the main thing making video games expensive and risky to make.
hahaha, wii hd
Pachter is what... mid 50's? He'll be gone before consoles are.
Microsoft thought they knew a lot of things....just saying.
The "fucked up graphics race" was a problem last-gen because it caused Microsoft and Sony to take losses on their console hardware initially, which required them to make up the difference in other areas.
Apart from that, it's not just a hardware thing by a long shot, since both new consoles are being sold approximately at cost or for a slight profit. It's a fucked up production values race that raises questions about the future of AAA console games, and that includes a lot more than just graphics. You have professional voice acting, licensed and orchestrated music, large teams of writers, enormous advertising campaigns... Graphics factor into that, of course, but they're hardly the main thing making video games expensive and risky to make.
Always wrong and still getting paid how does he do it?
I've regarded graphics as the main issue in heightening production values and still think it is. They say back in the 90's, Final Fantasy VII already had a marketing budget of like $100M. That's ridiculously huge even today.
But ask yourself if Square would've actually made a profit off of FFVII if it had to meet the graphical demands of today (and exceed them, as FF always has), let alone any other studio that didn't have such a powerful brand. They would've gone bankrupt faster than you can say The Spirits Within
Professional voice acting... orchestrated music, these things in my opinion don't play nearly as big a factor as is necessary to hire a gigantic team, pay licensing fees everywhere out the wazoo to make some AAA blockbuster with absurd graphical fidelity.
You don't have to abide by professional voice acting, you don't have to get orchestrated music, or a large team of writers (I mean really? 90% of the games that come out today have a completely negligible story line so I'm not sure what these writers are supposed to be doing), but if you're making console games today you do have to abide by these fucking graphic hogs because they're where the money is. Graphics are the easiest 'quality' to see