NeoGAF

That's an amazing image.

Seems to run perfectly for me. Loads of processing power to spare as expected @ 1920x1080p on a 4770K, 2x GTX 780 SLI.

Which makes it a little disappointing that:

A) The game is capped at 60fps
B) DSR isn't yet supported for SLI + G-Sync configurations.. :(

i5 2500k, 8GB RAM, GTX 760 2GB here. Maxed out at 1920x1080.

With old drivers, low 50's dropping up to 42 with hell unleashed on screen.
With beta drivers, high 50's dropping up to 47.

It runs smooth as hell.

Anyone with a 7950?

Runs like a dream maxed out on my i5 4570/GTX 970 config (downsampling via DSR, not sure which exact resolution lol, just turned it up until I lost locked 60). Great work.

Such a good banner.

Originally Posted by Nete

i5 2500k, 8GB RAM, GTX 760 2GB here. Maxed out at 1920x1080.

With old drivers, low 50's dropping up to 42 with hell unleashed on screen.
With beta drivers, high 50's dropping up to 47.

It runs smooth as hell.

Pretty much my experience on a 3 year old i5 @ 3.5ghz coupled with a GTX 670 4gb. Seems to be running at 60fps about 80/90% of the time with some dips below 50. However unless you have a frame rate counter I can't see you noticing any huge drops in framerate.

The game runs buttery smooth on my i7 975 & GTX 970 with the new beta drivers. No performance dips from what I can tell. Excellent port.

And the game looks incredible. Holy wow. Finally seing the real time intro cutscene was beautiful.

That banner...I can't stop laughing.

Xeon 1230v3 8GB 270x

Will it run well? I have a 1440*900 monitor.

anyone got impressions with a GTX 660Ti at 1080p?

Is there no AA option in this game??? Everything is up but I still see aliasing.

Originally Posted by Durante

GameGPU article





Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

**If you've got an Nvidia GPU.

Would like to hear something from laptop gamers.

AMD 8320, r290, 8GB RAM. 1920 x 1080 with shadows and SSAO lowered to high for a smoother experience.

Would be interesting to see benchmarks on the 'high' settings - apparently those are the equivalent to the PS4 'settings'.

Game runs great but I feel like some of the DoF goes overboard. Like maxed out in the options menu the side view of Snake is kinda just blurry. Turning down screen filtering reduces it somewhat. So many settings are wrapped up in SF I wish there was a way to tweak various ones.

Ugh, only 30-40fps on 7950?

Originally Posted by TheLegendOfMart

Ugh, only 30fps on 7950?

At maximum settings, are you surprised ?

Originally Posted by Durante

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

jip, disappointed in the 290 performance.

Originally Posted by IcyBlueStrawberry

**If you've got an Nvidia GPU.

Yea AMD performance is dogshit.

Originally Posted by Durante

GameGPU article



Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

Dat 680.

Originally Posted by Kezen

At maximum settings, are you surprised ?

Yes, 7950 is almost 760 tier which is somehow faster than 280X in those benches.

GTX 670 still rocking :)

Really hoping my 660M will hang in there.

repost

Alright, had to knock down lightning and SSAO down to mere "high". All the other stuff at extra high at 1080p gives me 60fps without any drops, on 2500k@4ghz, 280X, 8GB RAM.

Funnily enough, at 1080p I get 20-40fps in 15 years old game Outcast. But then this is a voxel based game that does not use GPU in any way :)

Originally Posted by Captain Pants

Really hoping my 660M will hang in there.

pls post back

Looks like I can expect 60 FPS at 2560x1600. Good times.

Originally Posted by TheLegendOfMart

Yes, 7950 is almost 760 tier which is somehow faster than 280X in those benches.

Maybe AMD haven't got enough time to optimize their drivers for the game. A 7950 should be ahead of a 760.

Worth a note: GameGPU's benches aren't using the new Nvidia beta drivers.

Someone with a AMD 5850 xtreme or similar here and can tell me about the performance?

Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

Originally Posted by Blablurn

pls post back

I'm at work for the next 5 hours, but I'll follow up eventually.

Originally Posted by Coconut

Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

When you post GameGPU results, there's always at least one guy who doesn't understand benchmarking.

Why is AMD performance so bad?

Originally Posted by blastprocessor

Why is AMD performance so bad?

nVidia title, so AMD might not have had access to the game before release.
It still runs well enough, but yeah comparable gpu on AMD side is slower than nVidia. I expect driver update soon.

Still it sucks though, it would be nice if both companies had access to all games.

GTX 670
4gb ram
3570k
non-beta driver

Drops from 60 rarely occur, maxed out at extra high for everything at 1080p. Only bugs include some weird DoF when aiming in first person sometimes and some erratic drops turning the camera.

Originally Posted by Durante

GameGPU article





Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

AMD performances are really subpar on this game.. R9 290 performing nearly the same as GTX670 ? This really needs a driver update.

Just sold my i5 setup and bought a cheapo build with parts from Kijiji until the new AMD cards come out, and I'll do a complete rebuild.

Lol specs:
i3 530 4Ghz
Sapphire 7870XT 3 1100/1600

Model Detail - High
Texture Detail - Extra High
Texture Filtering - Extra High
Shadows - High
Lighting - Extra High
Screen Filtering - High
SSAO - High
Effects - Extra High

And getting 60 fps(only played for a few mintues so far) at 1600x900 and 40-50% CPU usage, 60-70% GPU usage. Running the Omega Drivers.

Not many people should problems with this game unless they want high resolutions and maxed out. Can't really tell the difference with the settings I put on High from Extra High.

Only issue so far is that helicopter landings cause my framerate to drop by around 10FPS. And the camera control can be somewhat jerky at times on a controller.

Originally Posted by IronicTonic

GTX 670
4gb ram
3570k
non-beta driver

Drops from 60 rarely occur, maxed out at extra high for everything at 1080p. Only bugs include some weird DoF when aiming in first person sometimes and some erratic drops turning the camera.

Yeah is the first person aiming supposed to be so ugly? The DoF doesn't look so hot.

4770k
770 2gb

All settings at max

Originally Posted by Coconut

Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

Originally Posted by Durante

When you post GameGPU results, there's always at least one guy who doesn't understand benchmarking.

Explain then.

Working with an i5-4670k, GTX 970, 16GB RAM with everything on max on a 1080p display.

This game looks absolutely gorgeous. Jaw-droppingly so. No frame drops that I can notice, no tearing, no aliasing. Good job Kojima.

i7 3770k@3.9GHZ
1920x1080
GTX 780 Classified 3GB (1137MHZ)
Crucial MX100 SSD
8GB RAM
Win 7 64 bit

Played for about an hour,everything maxed, rock solid 60, no drops at all so far.

2560x1440
i5 3570k @ 4.6ghz
15gb RAM
GTX 780ti OC-ed a bit

Runs perfectly, constant 60, all settings maxed.

Anyone with a comparable system to mine have any impression?

i5 2500k 4.2ghz
R9 290
8GB 2133Mhz ram

Playing in 1440p, but I was hoping to downsample from 1800p

Originally Posted by BPoole

Anyone with a comparable system to mine have any impression?

i5 2500k 4.2ghz
R9 290
8GB 2133Mhz ram

Playing in 1440p, but I was hoping to downsample from 1800p

At 1080p, performances are fine.
But at 1440p (I tried to downsample) I get 30-40FPS.