|
|
(04-22-2006,
07:38 PM)
|
#12
Seriously, are people desperate? Daxter is a solid game, but it has camera and collision problems, and it's rather simple and generic. It's definitely not "Amazing," or the best platform in the last few years, as one person on here said. Geez, calm down.
|
|
Member
(04-22-2006,
10:01 PM)
|
#14
Originally Posted by Soul4ger:
well you know when one has nothing to eat... |
|
should think twice before lying about games he's never played
(04-22-2006,
10:02 PM)
|
#16
Originally Posted by RiotPelaaja:
......![]() |
|
Snitch
(04-23-2006,
12:12 AM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by Bud:
Even that - it has to compete with the Jak games, the Ratchet games, the Sly games, Sunshine, Kirby CC, Drill Dozer, Wario Land 4, Mega Man Zero, Psychonauts, etc. |
|
(04-23-2006,
01:52 AM)
|
#20
Sorry. Game isn't really that great. It's a good game, but I think the one dude is right. Beggars can't be choosers, I guess. I've played more platformers than I care to remember, and though I enjoyed Daxter, it's incredibly short, it reuses level themes for god's sake, it has camera and collision detection issues.. The levels are linear, they're basic collect-a-thons. I don't get it. Whatever.
|