None.
It's video games; I don't hold grudges like a child.
Ding, ding, ding!
None.
It's video games; I don't hold grudges like a child.
None as such but Ubisoft are damn close
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.Ding, ding, ding!
Gearbox. Aliens: Colonial Marines.
Just because I'm not explicitly boycotting a publisher doesn't mean I buy shit games. I judge on a game by game basis. I'm not rushing out to buy Ubisoft DLC Bloatfest 7 but I'll still buy a Ubisoft game if all impressions I got of it look good, which is usually their more budget releases.You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.
Bioware.
Never gonna touch a Bioware game again.
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.
This + Gearbox after Colonial Marines (but I will dive in Borderlands 3 anyway)Activision. But it's just because their way of making games and my taste in games have a 0% overlap.
I don't buy EA, Microsoft, or most of Ubisoft's titles because I think their business practices are detrimental to the industry.
Get angry about it.
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.
EA and Ubisoft purely for their terrible practices and more than often terrible games. It's not that I refuse to buy their games, it's just they don't make any games that look good to me that I want to buy.
The genre of fighting is in my black book. I really tried but it is just not for me. Never again.
Having an absolute no buy rule is stupid. Ultimately even previously bad entertainment producers can produce excellent work, change poor work conditions, or halt anti consumer actions.
Saying that, I do have a 'shit list' of untrustworthy publishers and studios, so make it a rule to never preorder Ubisoft or EA titles for instance, and wait for both good reviews and sales before purchasing if it does look ok.
Now this is a good post. That is exactly what I would out into my black list as well games that don't hold my attention. When I see it's from them I just move on.I say, in good conscious, that I believe, Sega will put together another great Sonic game. They did so with Sonic Colours and Sonic Generations and they will do it again.
I don't really have a blackbook, but there are developers where I am not too positive I'll ever play a game by them that I like:
* Bioware: I have played Sonic Chronicles. Mass Effect 3 and Dragon Age Inquisition, none of them were any fun to me whatsoever. A few friends are bugging me to try out Mass Effect 1, but since I completely abhore both, game and world design from Mass Effect 3 (oh and as a huge Science-Fiction fan, I also hate the story) and see absolutely no saving grace for that game at all. Nothing that even remotely interests me.
* Traveller's Tales: The last game they made that I liked was Sonic R. It also was the only one. Numerous Lego games, Sonic 3D Blast and SMB Adventure all were supremely lackluster and shallow experiences for me, I highly doubt they'll put out something I like in the future.
* EA: Not a developer, but a publisher. They did publish Portal 1 (through Orange Box) and Portal 2, so obviously, they are not all bad for me, but their main output, consisting of sports games, a bad aproximation of arcade racing (open world shit), Sims and shooters, is uninteresting for me just by genre. They could be the best games ever in their respective fields, I'd still hate them.
* Blizzard: Diablo 1 & 3 felt like mindless skinner boxes to me (wander around, slash some enemies and collect random stuff that's good hopefully), WoW I've only played for a short amount of time, but found abysmal for similar reasons as Diablo, and StarCraft / WarCraft just are not my type of strategy game (I don't like building stuff)
* Media Molecule: I hate the floaty physics in LittleBigPlanet, I don't like the focus on gimmicks and narrative in Tearaway. They work in a genre I like (platformers), but if they don't seriously change their approach towards optimizing gameplay & mechanics before anything else, it's unlikely I'll like their output (Though Tearaway was at least playable, as opposed to LBP).
* Shooter-only teams like 343 industries, Infinity Wards, now Neversoft, Treyarch, Sledgehammer, Guerilla Games and so on produce shooters. I don't like shooters....
So a lot of developers where I highly doubt I'll like anything they do
I think putting them in the black book is informed. From trends and bad practices you can tell where their mindset is and you can make the informed action of putting them in the bookNone. Seems a bit silly, and a little reactionary. If you make informed purchases, odds are you won't be hugely disappointed.
Ubisoft.
I know there's a lot of "If I like the game, I buy it" going on in here, and I respect that. I used to be that way with Ubi games. But Ubisoft is the only company to constantly burn me with every purchase.
- Withholding information from customers until after launch (like features)
- Buggy launches
- Terrible PR (Animation budget for female characters, 1080p debates, etc)
- Terrible Monetization practices.
It's a shame, too, because they just happen to have compelling IP. I'm a HUGE Far Cry fan, and because of how they treated the Far Cry multiplayer community, I boycotted the game. I'm not one to usually do that sort of thing, but this is a repeated activity from Ubi that I just couldn't stand for anymore. A terrible company. When even EA looks like a better company, you know you done fucked up.
I agree completelt there are many other games, I would never consider it something I'm missing out on. There are not enough hours in a day to play everything.I haven't bought a game from ubisoft or EA in years. Mainly because they don't make games that I care about, but even if they did, I don't like the hoops they make you jump through (uplay, origin, season passes, etc etc) just to play a full game. Every time I played one of their games I felt like they were deliberately cutting content to monetize it or making me do things in an effort to nickel and dime me in some other way. Comes off as sleazy to me and I just don't like or support the practice.
That's not to say I don't like dlc or season passes, it's just that when they do it, I *FEEL* like i'm being ripped off. "This should have been in the base game and you're trying to charge me for it?" I basically don't buy games with sleazy DLC or publisher-based interfaces necessary to play the game. EA and ubi are the worst at this, but EA seems to be slowly crawling out of the hole they were in while Ubi keeps digging itself further down.
Exactly. Even when they DO make a good looking game... the thought of having to deal with their crap to play it discourages me from doing it.
Make a good game, make it easy for me to play it, don't nickel and dime me, and then we'll talk. Until then, there are PLENTY of other fish in the sea.
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.
the $60 asking price for video games these days
THESE DAYS, RIGHT GUYS?!
THESE DAYS, RIGHT GUYS?!
You do realzie most people here probably popped in the ps1 -ps2 era.
People always put things in the context of now, which is why regardless of how prices are now and yesterday it's irrelevant.And? A false statement is a false statement. Considering inflation, gaming today is in the lower end in terms of price. These things don't become irrelevant because you were too young to remember them.
People always put things in the context of now, which is why regardless of how prices are now and yesterday it's irrelevant.
$60 asking price for video games these days
You make no sense. This statement is clearly alluding to the belief that games today are more expensive than ever. I fail to see how bringing up the fact that games were more expensive in the past is irrelevant.
Just because I'm not explicitly boycotting a publisher doesn't mean I buy shit games. I judge on a game by game basis. I'm not rushing out to buy Ubisoft DLC Bloatfest 7 but I'll still buy a Ubisoft game if all impressions I got of it look good, which is usually their more budget releases.
You could argue I'm boycotting Activison because I don't think I've bought a game from them in over a decade but in reality its just that they haven't made any games I care about. If they ever put something good out I'll buy it.
None.
It's video games; I don't hold grudges like a child.
Ding, ding, ding!
You guys must either have way too much money or way too much free time, then, because at the $60 asking price for video games these days I don't know how you guys can afford it. Hell, I'll drop an author over a few bad books and most books these days you can get first run for like $15. I can't imagine continuously buying shit over and over again only with "oh well maybe they'll get it together next time..." as a response. Just seems like blind, sheepish consumerism to me.