Who are these sinister children and who are they starving?
She couldn't have rejected him in a nicer, more friendly, yet clear manner.
Something is up with this guy.
What is up with Gaf flipping out whenever someone blocks someone on social media?I think what set him off was she told him she had a boyfriend and then blocked him on Twitter and Facebook at the same time. Maybe she could have given him a chance to get the message without doing that? This might have been avoided.
The guy clearly has issues, though.
The "Harry Potter fan-podcaster" designation for the guy makes the situation confusing. You assume that the rejection is from someone in the Potter cast, but it is really from a completely unrelated buzzfeed writer?
You'd be right - the director wanted to get a serious take, but the actors were having trouble keeping composure, so he decided to let them go with this kind of scene instead.
I think what set him off was she told him she had a boyfriend and then blocked him on Twitter and Facebook at the same time. Maybe she could have given him a chance to get the message without doing that? This might have been avoided.
The guy clearly has issues, though.
The only thing I have defended is the girl's right to be left the hell alone. Fairly obvious. Unless you are unable to make the distinction between being uneasy with internet justice and defending a guy's obvious harassment of the girl.
The "Harry Potter fan-podcaster" designation for the guy makes the situation confusing. You assume that the rejection is from someone in the Potter cast, but it is really from a completely unrelated buzzfeed writer?
Never said we can't make fun of him in a contained manner. You just need to be mindful that there is a line. When people actively inject themselves into this guy's life by sending him messages I definitely feel is stepping over the line.
I just don't see how this is a controversial take.
I think what set him off was she told him she had a boyfriend and then blocked him on Twitter and Facebook at the same time. Maybe she could have given him a chance to get the message without doing that? This might have been avoided.
The guy clearly has issues, though.
Ended up a lot better like this im sure.
Never said we can't make fun of him in a contained manner. You just need to be mindful that there is a line. When people actively inject themselves into this guy's life by sending him messages I definitely feel is stepping over the line.
I just don't see how this is a controversial take.
I think it was mostly for identification purposes; a few people in this thread were familiar with him, so he definitely had SOME recognition.
What is up with Gaf flipping out whenever someone blocks someone on social media?
haha that clip looks so natural, no way that was scripted.
Beats me.
After politely explaining that she wasn't interested, she also blocked him on Facebook and Twitter (understandably).
That directly preceded the meltdown, likely because he couldn't believe she didn't want to talk to him.
Typical Hufflepuff
So can someone do a quick summary? What happened after she made all of this public?
I realize that people need to realize that they are indeed in "L column." That is an important component to stopping and changing their behavior. What frame of mind they realize this in can vary wildly, and I think without much notice on our end. What we have seen countless times, is that once a realization occurs, no matter what psychological state the person is and no matter the level of actual remorse and regret, the internet is not going to instantly stop. No one is at the controls to stop when this guy inevitably realizes what he has done.I definitely agree with the general concept, and it's entirely possible some people in this thread have gone too far outside this forum. I'm not sure.
But I would add that people (not just Ben Schoen) make things exponentially more difficult for themselves when they refuse to apologize for what is an obvious error.
Instead of recognizing that he was wrong, Schoen has not just refused to apologize, he's doubled down, insisting he is the truly righteous one. We see this sometimes on GAF; someone makes a silly error, sometimes even a trifling one, and that error is pointed out to him. But instead of admitting he was wrong and apologizing, the poster doubles down and attacks everyone who disagrees with him as a fanboy or an idiot or what have you. These sorts of tirades always end up exponentially worse than they would have been if the person had just "taken the L" and moved on.
Human beings really, really hate "taking the L," though. And I include myself in this.
Except these guys are clearly clueless. They're clueless because they are entitled. The earlier that entitlement is erased, the better.
What is up with Gaf flipping out whenever someone blocks someone on social media?
What is up with Gaf flipping out whenever someone blocks someone on social media?
That is the scary part of all this. How do you direct a guy to change behavior without them resorting to the two extremes of reacting out. The internet is far too similar to a roundhouse kick off the edge than the help down the ladder.Probably best to leave him alone, lest you create another Elliot Rodger.
I think what set him off was she told him she had a boyfriend and then blocked him on Twitter and Facebook at the same time. Maybe she could have given him a chance to get the message without doing that? This might have been avoided.
The guy clearly has issues, though.
That is the scary part of all this. How do you direct a guy to change behavior without them resorting to the two extremes of reacting out. The internet is far too similar to a roundhouse kick off the edge than the help down the ladder.
Yep. He's got no social skills and coping mechanisms, which leaves her with no options. She blocks him and he loses it, or she ignores him and he loses it, or she responds negatively to him and he loses it. He traps her through aggressive boundary crossing and trying to trick her by offering fake jobs because he has no way to relate and connect with her normally.Blocking complete strangers that give you a weird vibe on social media shouldn't be an action that is even questioned. You have the right to completely control who can and cannot interact with you. Him being a bit butthurt about getting blocked is understandable but his actions since then prove once again that the gut instinct you get about a person is often for good reason. If she hadn't blocked him, he probably would've kept tweeting her/messaging her on Facebook and then when his messages went unanswered, he would've flipped out anyway.
Ahh. This wouldn't be so bad if he just apologized and explained his "Faux fanboy" act without the angry tweets and drawn out apology where he pretends to be a helpful entrepreneur. The apology is hilariously self serving.
Also Patryn, using her name so casually also adds to the creepiness. I'm guessing he's never actually met her?
Probably best to leave him alone, lest you create another Elliot Rodger.
Harry Potter and the trigger of azkabanGuys he doesn't like the title of this thread. He doesn't want to be associated with Harry Potter anymore. And here we go with the men's rights. He's trying so hard to dissociate himself from those guys.