Bam Bam Baklava
Member
Opinions, how do they work?
They said best looking, not best tech.
Aesthetics are all opinion at the end of the day, but I'd have to agree in that MGSV looks for its time similar to how MGS2 did. The lighting, animation, and style are very natural, and so don't jump out at you as being omg so amazing, but at the same time, in quite a few years, I imagine MGSV will also be like MGS2 in that it will still look stunning, and perfectly capture its intended style, while other games you will look back on and go, man, I remember when I thought that looks amazing, but now all these things jump out at me.
Even now, I can play MGS2 and it looks great, minus the faces. A perfectly rendered box will remain a perfectly rendered box for a very long time, where as a neatly rendered box with a bunch of cool effects on it might age and those effects will become more noticeable with time.
Like Conker's Bad Fur Day. The fur looked amazing at the time, but now it looks kind of neat in that I know the techniques used to achieve it and it doesn't look realistic at all.
Maybe I'm fanboying, so Pinch of Bucket of Truck of Dumpster of salt.
I would agree that the cutscenes are very nice looking but when you're actually playing it's impossible not to notice how bad some stuff looks. In this pic most of the ground and foliage just looks like a mess.