I feel like the commentary in that piece is mostly unfair.
First, Jon Stewart reached legendary status in the world of political commentary after years and years of figuring it out. Trevor is on the cusp of completing year one, and he's still figuring out that groove. He deserves more time.
Second, the landscape has changed. Jon Stewart carried the mantle of that liberal iconoclastic attack dog, but that mantle's been dispersed across several new commentators. Samantha Bee, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Trevor Noah, Larry Wilmore. They're all sharp, biting in their own way, and mirror Stewart's style in many ways. Is it fair to place all accountability for Stewart's absence on just one of those people? Probably not.
Do I think Noah has the best news satire program on TV? Hardly. I think Samantha Bee has carried on the heart and soul of Stewart's legacy and her show is fucking brilliant. She's fucking brilliant. I'm seeing her clips circulating on social media already but it's gonna be a slow burn. I think she has the potential to fill that void for people, but as with Stewart, she's going to need more time to settle in.