That has to do with the lack of AA. It should look better on the Switch due to res, but lack of AA means it'll be just as jaggy.Doesn't look native to me. Quite jaggity, actually.
Your power estimates would go against what we've heard from other sources. I've also not heard anyone say the Switch version runs worse than Wii U. I've seen people say it doesn't run perfectly but that it's still better than Wii U. I'd wait to see what more sources say about Mario Kart and what a full analysis of Zelda Wii U vs. Switch shows.
Watch the GameSpot videos. There is a guy who says it looks worse
It will play Nintendo games just fine. I'm not taking my PS4 on the go and the longest I have to travel anywhere is a 1.5 hour flight back to Calgary. My needs for this thing as a travel device are minimal.So is everyone happy with the power of this machine so far in consideration of the price, it's competitors, and the fact it's 5 years later than the Wii U?
So is everyone happy with the power of this machine so far in consideration of the price, it's competitors, and the fact it's 5 years later than the Wii U?
What was the last MK to not drop to 30 FPS in 4P mode? Double Dash? I know Wii was 30fps in 4P.
DigitalFoundry says the TVs at these events were set up horribly, with lots of post-processing and horrible sharpening. Could very well be that it looks worse than the WiiU version...on those specific TVs. I'd wait for direct feed footage from a properly calibrated TV before paying too much attention to any claims. Switch version is native 1080p docked after all, DigitalFoundry confirmed that much at least.Watch the GameSpot videos. There is a guy who says it looks worse
So is everyone happy with the power of this machine so far in consideration of the price, it's competitors, and the fact it's 5 years later than the Wii U?
So this thing is more capable than the wii u?
That's not bad for its size and portability imo
I believe it was DD. I remember thinking they definitely made compromises, however, to make that happen. I think the models went lower poly and/or the textures went lower res. Something like that.
I'm a framerate freak myself, so I would rather have the same kind of compromises than going 30fps. But whatevs.
Wait, did they actually fix that?I bet that one person who complained about 1 fps is a happy camper now.
DD also removed certain aesthetic elements of the tracks, Once you were playing with four players all you really had left was road texture.
I played 4 player DD and that wasn't really the case. It looked fine.
God yes. I just popped MK8 in the other day, forgetting all about the weird 59fps. You definitely feel it though.
Hate to be a downer but I thought Switch games played on tabletop mode is downgraded to 720p and 1080p is only when your playing on the tv.
Awesome if tabletop is 1080p as well but I doubt it due to battery life.
Hate to be a downer but I thought Switch games played on tabletop mode is downgraded to 720p and 1080p is only when your playing on the tv.
Awesome if tabletop is 1080p as well but I doubt it due to battery life.
Tabletop will never be more than 720p because the screen is 720p.
Man... that's pretty nice that it sticks with 60FPS for two players. Does that include portable mode?
Watch the GameSpot videos. There is a guy who says it looks worse
Yes, it does. I played split screen on the portable mode and there were no performance issues what so ever.
Also, to those asking if this looks better/worse than the Wii u version: I played a lot of MK8 on the Wii U, and aside from the resolution bump, this new version didn't look any noticeably different.
Make of that what you will.
(I'm buying it btw)
DigitalFoundry says the TVs at these events were set up horribly, with lots of post-processing and horrible sharpening. Could very well be that it looks worse than the WiiU version...on those specific TVs. I'd wait for direct feed footage from a properly calibrated TV before paying too much attention to any claims. Switch version is native 1080p docked after all, DigitalFoundry confirmed that much at least.
How did you expect it to work, unless they were playing online?
Yeah, this is good. Day 1 for me also.
Would you also compare a 600 dollar phone to a 600 dollar gaming PC?At $300, I'm comparing it to the WiiU, PS4, and Xbox1.
How can this be good? a 60 to 30 drop in fps isnt good lol...
Lol "there is a guy". Well I'm sure that one dude descredits all the other reports we've heard plus the direct feed footage we have.Watch the GameSpot videos. There is a guy who says it looks worse
Why are laptops more expensive than desktopsAt $300, I'm comparing it to the WiiU, PS4, and Xbox1.
So is everyone happy with the power of this machine so far in consideration of the price, it's competitors, and the fact it's 5 years later than the Wii U?
Well shucks
Was wondering about this in the original thread
Was hoping the switch could handle 4 player 1080p 60fps
Would you also compare a 600 dollar phone to a 600 dollar gaming PC?
The GameSpot guys pretty much thought everything ran worse (and when I say everything I mean MK8 and BOTW), which contradicts almost everyone else who played. I don't really trust them with this. They probably went into it looking for performance issues/improvements and ended up exaggerating the issues by accident or something.