• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Beauty And The Beast" will be first Disney movie to feature an openly gay character

Status
Not open for further replies.
The trailers for Disney's live action adaptation of Beauty And The Beast have hewed closely to the animated film, but the remake will apparently offer something both new and quite possibly revelatory. Director Bill Condon explained in a new interview with British magazine Attitude that it will tackle LGBT themes in historic fashion for the studio.

Didn't post the rest of the article, in-case the spoiler brigade comes for my head. More details within.

This is a welcome move for Disney, I hope they continue to push LGBT representation further in their upcoming films.

If you're wondering, and don't want to click through, for whatever reason:
LeFou's got it bad for Gaston in this adaptation.
 
Eagerly awaiting angry articles and comments saying how they ruined a character that wasn't even important in the original movie.
 

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
I kinda suspected as much from one of the clips. The actor was playing it up, so at the very least they were going for it. Happy to see everyone in the production had the same read of the material and just went for it.
 
If you're wondering, and don't want to click through, for whatever reason:
LeFou's got it bad for Gaston in this adaptation.
All you need to do is look at the lyrics to "Gaston" and you'd see there was already some homoerotic subtext to begin with.
 

Nev

Banned
I mean, he was pretty open in the original movie too. I guess it's good that they didn't force some dumb Lumiere x Cogsworth fanfic though, which is what I was expecting.
 
While I think I get what you're saying, I'm super curious what "normally gay" means.

I think he means "very masculine who just happens to like men". I think we all know he means he doesn't want him to be a caricature, I'm hoping the thread doesn't shit on him the rest of the time.
 

Rayis

Member
There's nothing wrong with having a feminine gay male character if it's done right, in fact, I have a HUGE problem with the only gay male representation people want being ultra masculine gay characters indistinguishable from their straight counterparts.
 
I think he means "very masculine who just happens to like men". I think we all know he means he doesn't want him to be a caricature, I'm hoping the thread doesn't shit on him the rest of the time.

Not going to shit on anyone. "Very masculine who just happens to like men" is one kind of gay for certain, but calling it "normally gay" is problematic.

Media should indeed portray more than one "type" of gay person, but calling one "normal" implies the others are abnormal.
 
People here are saying that it was always obvious with
Lefou
, but I always thought he was just a comic relief suck-up toadie.
 

jett

D-Member
People here are saying that it was always obvious with
Lefou
, but I always thought he was just a comic relief suck-up toadie.

That's what I thought.

But I'm not really that surprised by this change, that is after seeing the tavern clip. Josh Kad seems to be playing him with a certain flamboyancy.
 
People here are saying that it was always obvious with
Lefou
, but I always thought he was just a comic relief suck-up toadie.

I think the implication in the original was that Gaston was SUCH a manly man that even other men couldn't deny his appeal.
But IMO LeFou certainly wasn't straight up into him as this news would imply for the remake.
 
But $100% serious for a second:

Hugo the gargoyle in Hunchback is gay. He romantically pursues the character Djali, who is a male goat.
 

Bulzeeb

Member
Not going to shit on anyone. "Very masculine who just happens to like men" is one kind of gay for certain, but calling it "normally gay" is problematic.

Media should indeed portray more than one "type" of gay person, but calling one "normal" implies the others are abnormal.

He could have worded it better but I agree with his point, I take normal gay not necessary as a masculine gay dude but as someone who is not shoved in your face so you could see how gay he is. I dare to say that more than "normal gay" the idea should be a character that feels natural into the narrative/story they want to tell and not someone forced into it so the viewer could see how progressive they are by featuring gender diversity
 

Goodstyle

Member
LeFou wasn't
gay for Gaston in the original.

Check out this scene for example. The dynamic in the film wasn't that he was secretly in love with Gaston, it's more that he was a sycophant that was ironically smarter than he seemed and may have actually held a low opinion of Gaston deep down. There's also that line in the Gaston reprise where he calls thinking a "dangerous past-time" for him.
 

Boem

Member
But $100% serious for a second:

Hugo the gargoyle in Hunchback is gay. He romantically pursues the character Djali, who is a male goat.

A statue being in love with a goat is not what I would call a triumphant victory for the gay community.
 
Not going to shit on anyone. "Very masculine who just happens to like men" is one kind of gay for certain, but calling it "normally gay" is problematic.

Media should indeed portray more than one "type" of gay person, but calling one "normal" implies the others are abnormal.

oh I get that, to me the only normal thing about a human being are the biological functionalities, everything else is what makes us unique from one another and not freakin robots.

But I think the portrayal of flamboyant gay is problematic BECAUSE that was once the "normal" gay portrayed in the media. They have finally gone along and expanded the spectrum thanks to shows like Glee, Adam Pally's character on Happy Endings, Modern Family and the like.

Actually, now that I think about it a flamboyant gay man being a mundane sight would be a win.
 

Fuu

Formerly Alaluef (not Aladuf)
People here are saying that it was always obvious with
Lefou
, but I always thought he was just a comic relief suck-up toadie.
LeFou wasn't
gay for Gaston in the original.

Check out this scene for example. The dynamic in the film wasn't that he was secretly in love with Gaston, it's more that he was a sycophant that was ironically smarter than he seemed and may have actually held a low opinion of Gaston deep down. There's also that line in the Gaston reprise where he calls thinking a "dangerous past-time" for him.
Yep. It's an easy change to make anyway.

Not sure how I feel about it for now. I'm all for more gay characters in any media, but we'll see. I'm not even trusting this movie to be actually good just yet.

Why are we spoilering this? Does the remake count as a brand new movie that can be spoiled?
It's unnecessary, yeah. Even if it wasn't a remake, anyone clicking the thread should expect to see people openly discussing what character the article is talking about.
 

Garlador

Member
tumblr_m5fu8j02cc1r2g7mto1_500.png


So... the same as before.

Only known downside to the live-action remake is we won't get freeze-frame shots of Gaston that look like this:
 
It doesn't change the story and welcomes a gay character into the narrative so I'm fine but they better not try to redeem gaston in any way. I want my Disney villains to be villains. No time for redemption arcs.
 

Firebrand

Member
I guess that explains the reaction to the "team" line in the song clip the other day.

Apparently there is a good case to be made that Scar is gay, and that one of the incidental characters in Frozen is gay.
Incidentally, Scar was played by gay singer / actor Rikard Wolff in the Swedish version, and he was fucking awesome. Not that there was anything particular "gay" about his performance, he sounds a lot like Jeremy Irons actually. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFpaxK2PzQI
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom