• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

First reviews for the Emoji Movie (take a wild guess!!!!!!)

Oersted

Member
I don't think this film will be a success. It won't be an assured bomb, but I'm pretty confident that the film will just barely break even at best.

Sony's continued to be dogged by a string of domestic flops at the box office, and The Emoji Movie's universally negative reviews assuredly make sure that the film will likely have to rely entirely on overseas grosses to make a profit. Moreover, Sony Pictures and former financing partner LStar Capital (who helped fund The Emoji Movie) also split ties recently, so Sony will have to take the full brunt of any financial losses that may happen from this film.

In addition, the last animated film I remember that got such a universally negative reception was "talking twerking Rob Schneider polar bear movie" Norm of the North. While that was a film made on a significantly cheaper budget ($18M) and released by a smaller studio, it didn't change the fact that the film failed to make its money back, in thanks due to its poor reviews and word of mouth. (That film was reportedly supposed to get two DTV sequels, but they have yet to show to my knowledge....)

Furthermore, there's also been a lot of competition this summer too--in terms of animated films or family-targeted films, Emoji Movie will have to make a foothold against the better-reviewed Despicable Me 3 and Spider-Man Homecoming (distributed by Sony themselves). That's to say nothing of very well-received general releases like Dunkirk and Apes as well.

EDIT: Another positive review from El Nuevo Dia (site is Spanish). RT percentage is at 6% now (2/35 pos. reviews)



Pets didn't make a billion. It made $875M.

Thanks. Point remains, it made good money.
 

Mr_Zombie

Member
wrong

204FguX.jpg

I know that this is the first Scotland's CGI animated feature film and all that, but still, how can you design/model such unappealing characters and be like "that will do it!"? There are '90 video games with much simpler CGI that look more appealing than this.
 

Toothless

Member
Saw it last night.

The Emoji Movie is absolutely horrendous. The animation is lazy, the voice-acting for the most part is dull, and it all reeks of a sinister corporation deciding what is best for humanity's next generation. Easy morals executed in the worst ways possible and the most obnoxious side character ever to disgrace an animated film. The plot is an annoying combination of Wreck-It Ralph and The LEGO Movie, literally taking songs from both films' soundtracks. These songs score Spotify and Just Dance! respectively, a part of the mediocre advertising that permeates the film. The only thing that marginally entertains is the subplot with Gene's parents, which is also wholly predictable but at least amusingly voice-acted. Going hard on The Emoji Movie seems unfair; it's been clear since its announcement nobody wanted this movie and it would always be the target of derision. However, after seeing the Internet's least favorite film of the past year, I have to sadly agree with them. The Emoji Movie is a derivative bore that feels like active torture to watch. It could've strived to at least reach a ”meh" quality, but alas, it only reaches the quality of the Emoji portrayed by Sir Patrick Stewart.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
She's not even hot in it? :(

Well, at least there's Atomic Blonde :D
DeepUncomfortableIcelandicsheepdog-size_restricted.gif
Yeah she's hot but instead it just makes me wonder if I'm a necrophilliac for thinking so and that's not what I wanted in a Mummy movie.

Stupid, sexy, mummy (and that's not, like, Oedipal, either).
 
My sons are HYPED for this due to 💩. If anyone is wondering how this ends-up making money, it's me buying 6 tickets when we go. Meanwhile I saw Dunkirk with just my wife.
 
I honestly think this movie is probably not so bad and appeals to young children. A lot of reviews sounds like 'old man yelling at cloud' . I will probably not enjoy it neither but if kids enjoy it, shouldn't that be taken into consideration?
 
Lol at one of the few positive reviews:

The small-scale achievements in this film are a model worthy of admiration; In terms of the balance that can be achieved between creativity and commercialization in a production that seeks to generate family entertainment.

Right. "Balance."
 

zsynqx

Member
Havent seen the movie but i dont get why everyone is so pissed and knew from the beginning it sucked. The fact that emoji's are the characters is just a detail. The story could have been great/inspiring/etc. I hope the reviewers were a bit open minded, cause if they already went in with a 'meh' face... that's just stupid
I honestly think this movie is probably not so bad and appeals to young children. A lot of reviews sounds like 'old man yelling at cloud' . I will probably not enjoy it neither but if kids enjoy it, shouldn't that be taken into consideration?

It was predictable when fanboys would bash critics for giving Suicide Squad and BvS bad reviews, but why the fuck would you do it for the emoji movie?
 

Lijik

Member
wound up seeing it last night and something that stood out to me was the editing was really bad. there were a few scenes that were placed oddly like they were shuffled around and some that felt like they were cut off before they were actually over (usually punctuated with a fade to black). its really weird especially since the animation process usually prevents these types of things from happening
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
Probably since Kaz Hirai took the Sony CEO role in 2012. Speaking of which, I still remember reading about how Kaz Hirai fired Andrew Garfield and canned Amazing Spiderman 3 because Garfield stood up Kaz at some gala event in Brazil. Hey Spiderman Homecoming fans! You got Andrew Garfield to thank for that movie hahaha. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/real-reaso...d-sonys-spider-man-franchise-revealed-1499428

I hear a lot of people hating Tom Rothman as well, known for being a huge micro manager with creative insights like sentinels shouldn't be in xmen, and deadpool's mouth should be stitched shut, before he was kicked out of Fox.

But that is also someone Kaz backs, while it seems like most other people in the company do not.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
Does that scene live up to the hype? It felt kinda cheap in the trailer like "this will bring in the dudes" type shit.

But as a straight male it caught my attention cause I'm shameless.

I don't know what hype it is, but they are both nude by the end. It goes on for a while.

Their relationship is a lot more than just the scene, fortunately. It fit in with the story and style of the film, while also probably being there to get male asses in seats.
 
It was predictable when fanboys would bash critics for giving Suicide Squad and BvS bad reviews, but why the fuck would you do it for the emoji movie?

I just don't like people judging a book by its cover. Again i haven't sern the movie neither and it IS probably bad, but it just looks like everyone was bashing it since the first poster, and that i find stupid.

First poster of Spiderman comes out, everybody is hyped. First emoji poster comes out, everybody says it will be trash.. .. why?
 
Probably since Kaz Hirai took the Sony CEO role in 2012. Speaking of which, I still remember reading about how Kaz Hirai fired Andrew Garfield and canned Amazing Spiderman 3 because Garfield stood up Kaz at some gala event in Brazil. Hey Spiderman Homecoming fans! You got Andrew Garfield to thank for that movie hahaha. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/real-reaso...d-sonys-spider-man-franchise-revealed-1499428

Based Kaz. Homecoming was a great movie. I couldn't even finish Amazing Spider-Man because of how awful the fake awkward acting was with Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone.

Also, I really love that the Emoji Movie seems to be doing well. Even if it is a shit movie from an adult perspective, if kids like it that's all that matters. I'll reserve judgment until Monday, but if it ends up meeting its projections it makes a lot of people look foolish.
 
I would give my review of the movie.

But this isn't a movie.

It's a 90 minute advertisement for whatever app payed the most to get whatever setpiece they were on at a particular moment. It's seriously the most gross and gratuitously soulless piece of media I have ever had the misfortune of seeing. It's NOTHING but product placement, it's honestly staggering just how little anybody involved in this on any level gave a shit, I can't even praise the animation because it's just so stilted and bland. Bright colors everywhere is not animation.

Ugh, I wish I was wrong and this didn't make a shitload of money, but of course it did, and will probably have legs, and Sony will shit out more of these abominations because there is no god damn way this thing didn't make money before it was even released based on how much god damn product placement was in it.
 

zsynqx

Member
I just don't like people judging a book by its cover. Again i haven't sern the movie neither and it IS probably bad, but it just looks like everyone was bashing it since the first poster, and that i find stupid.

First poster of Spiderman comes out, everybody is hyped. First emoji poster comes out, everybody says it will be trash.. .. why?

That's certainly a valid point, like I'm sure a number of people assumed the Lego Movie would be trash when that was first announced and look how that turned out. What I can't agree with is the idea that critics are just being snobbish and not giving it a fair shot.
 

Plumbob

Member
I just don't like people judging a book by its cover. Again i haven't sern the movie neither and it IS probably bad, but it just looks like everyone was bashing it since the first poster, and that i find stupid.

First poster of Spiderman comes out, everybody is hyped. First emoji poster comes out, everybody says it will be trash.. .. why?

This can't be a serious thought process.
 
I just don't like people judging a book by its cover. Again i haven't sern the movie neither and it IS probably bad, but it just looks like everyone was bashing it since the first poster, and that i find stupid.

First poster of Spiderman comes out, everybody is hyped. First emoji poster comes out, everybody says it will be trash.. .. why?

Because these projects get greenlit constantly and it's easy to tell the kinds of things that denote quality and craftsmanship alongside a vision from a creative department and what can only ever be qualified as a shameless cash grab from studios that know they hit enough focus groups to get a good enough ROI to justify the expense.

The signs of a bad film are usually immediately evident to film nerds.
 

LotusHD

Banned
I just don't like people judging a book by its cover. Again i haven't sern the movie neither and it IS probably bad, but it just looks like everyone was bashing it since the first poster, and that i find stupid.

First poster of Spiderman comes out, everybody is hyped. First emoji poster comes out, everybody says it will be trash.. .. why?

Because it looked dumb since Day 1, so people responded accordingly. Pretty much the whole point of posters and trailers, to give us that first or second impression. Now the reviews have confirmed this. As for whether kids enjoy it, I mean, if they do... cool? But they deserve better, it's a pretty weak excuse to dismiss bad reviews as "old men yelling at clouds"

I honestly dunno why people are caping for this movie, acting as if people are bullying it as if it's a real person or something. It's just a terrible movie that people accurately predicted would be terrible.


Every single time lol

When I hear a movie is basically offensively bad, my first instinct is to stay far away, not watch it with hopes that it's a movie that is so bad that it's good or what have you.
 
I mean, the entire reason film studios have released trailers and posters for the last 100 years is because they WANT you to judge a book by its cover.

It's advertising, the entire point of advertising is to use it to make a value judgement on a product or service.
 

I thought US audiences were finally waking up from funding trash after seeing how Transformers 5 tanked hard in the US.

Best-case scenario is that the film experiences a BvS-tier drop next week and doesn't recover from it. Otherwise...American audiences only have themselves to blame when we see The Emoji Movie 2 in two years time, or news breaks about a studio gaining the rights to a Fidget Spinners Movie. :v
 

snap

Banned
I thought US audiences were finally waking up from funding trash after seeing how Transformers 5 tanked hard in the US.

Best-case scenario is that the film experiences a BvS-tier drop next week and doesn't recover from it. Otherwise...American audiences only have themselves to blame when we see The Emoji Movie 2 in two years time, or news breaks about a studio gaining the rights to a Fidget Spinners Movie. :v

It went up against a low-profile action movie and the second weekend of a movie that didn't exactly have a massive opening weekend. It would've been very hard for it not to open to first place.
 

Dice//

Banned
Heh. Same.

Parents don't give a shit about reviews, they're just going to feed their kids this garbage and call it a week.

To be fair, in the aim of keeping kids occupied, Dunkirk and Atomic Blond might not be good choices for family-fun.
 
I mean it's getting bad word of mouth and, at least at the theater I was at, not one of the kids sans one that just went "MOMMY LOOK INSTAGRAM" every time a reference came up got more than light chuckling out of it.

My son hated it.
 
Top Bottom