• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New Clinton postmortem of campaign includes criticism of Sanders policy promises

Status
Not open for further replies.
It doesn't have to be. That's the beauty of it- you let the market work it out for itself. If companies won't provide those baseline insurance plans when faced with a gov't run competitor, then they're deciding to move you to a de facto public option all on their own!

You don't let the market work itself out regarding UHC. Even if you accept private healthcare (both in public funds or private), it should be a small percentage of the service.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Maybe he meant Switzerland?

Also I thought single payer was primarily privately delivered, disqualifying the UK. I wish Bernie was proposing an American NHS though!

The UK is singlepayer in the sense that there is a single payer, although it's different to other singlepayer systems such as Canada in that it is also singe provider (the NHS), whereas Canada and Sweden have multiple private bodies that actually provide the care once commissioned.
 
I can't believe people are still ready to roll the clock back to the primaries on a day like today.

Who gives a shit about the primaries? Who gives a shit about what if? I am not going to beat up on people who pulled for Bernie to win on a day like today, because we don't beat Trump by constantly trying to rerun a primary that will never be rerun. Bernie lost. Then Clinton lost. Hillary Clinton doesn't need to ever know why she lost to Trump for us to beat Trump going forwards.

This shit is meaningless next to DACA getting killed and 800,000 people being fucked over or a climate change denier being put in charge of NASA.

But Hillary has to make money selling books about ponies!!!
 

kamspy

Member
As much as it pains me to say it as a bleeding heart liberal...

Our massive defense spending has lead to the longest period of uninterrupted peace in modern world history. WWII was the last major international conflict and since ramped up defense spending for WWII and kept it going we've been such a presence no country is willing to commit to long term international conflicts.

Korea, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Cambodia, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, former Yugoslavia and the Philippines (among others) would probably all disagree just a little with the whole "uninterrupted peace" meme.
 

aeolist

Banned
As much as it pains me to say it as a bleeding heart liberal...

Our massive defense spending has lead to the longest period of uninterrupted peace in modern world history. WWII was the last major international conflict and since ramped up defense spending for WWII and kept it going we've been such a presence no country is willing to commit to long term international conflicts.

dunno if that's a bleeding heart liberal position as much as it is neocon
 
As much as it pains me to say it as a bleeding heart liberal...

Our massive defense spending has lead to the longest period of uninterrupted peace in modern world history. WWII was the last major international conflict and since ramped up defense spending for WWII and kept it going we've been such a presence no country is willing to commit to long term international conflicts.
yes I love the peace that was rained down upon innocent citizens of my homeland by countless planes, very peaceful

Also the peaceful rapists and killers in the US army, v. Peaceful
 
Korea, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Cambodia, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, former Yugoslavia and the Philippines (among others) would probably all disagree just a little with the whole "uninterrupted peace" meme.

All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.
 

Matt

Member
But Hillary has to make money selling books about ponies!!!
The election from her perspective is an incredibly interesting and historically relevant thing to have down on paper. Stop acting like she is doing something wrong talking about her own life.
 

kamspy

Member
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.

A bit more serious to whom?
 

aeolist

Banned
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.

these days the bad guys just massacre their own populations with US money and weapons

much better, especially since they're by and large poor brown people and not western europeans
 
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.

I think the merit of that is ours, Europe, not of your military forces.
 

Matt

Member
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.
Umm, what?
 
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.
What decides seriousness of a war or is this tales from my ass?
 
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.
the European Coal and Steel Community has substantially more to do with reductions in casualties of European wars than the American military
 

Matt

Member
the European Coal and Steel Community has substantially more to do with reductions in casualties of European wars than the American military
I think you can make a very good argument that modern Europe came into existence partially as a result of the protection of the US military.

But this isn't the thread for that discussion.
 
i-say-we-let-him-go-o.gif
 

Nipo

Member
All instigated by the US, and primarily involving the US. I'm talking about Germany not invading France and England retaliating while Spain throws in with Germany or something along those lines. WWI and WWII were each quite a bit more serious than any of those conflicts of not all of them combined.

Fewer people have died in state verus state armed conflict yes but the number of genocides and ethnic cleansing has been significant. It just happens in places the US doesn't care about so they don't stop a few million people from getting killed. I'm willing to bet most people don't even know t that there is active genocide in places like myanmar and almost no chance the US military will do anything about it.
 
The election from her perspective is an incredibly interesting and historically relevant thing to have down on paper. Stop acting like she is doing something wrong talking about her own life.

It's less about the book and more about gaf here. This thread is downright shameful. The epitome of privilege. Trump is destroying lives and everyone is shitting on each other. It's unfortunately typical of the left and really depressing.
 
"im upset that my opponent ran a campaign against me in the primary. Should Have just let me win"

Thank you for getting it completely wrong. I mean shit Bernie said ended up word for word in Trump ads and rallies. Really the point is that no matter what Hillary did it was always "look at this bitch eating crackers" to a percentage of folks coupled with Bernie staying in past the point he had no chance of winning AND still attacking her. I'm fine he stayed in, it's him keeping his word. But when he had no chance other than something catastrophic happening to Hillary, he should have cut the shit with attacks (I blame that goateed bald dude who kept sending out all the fundraiser emails the most for this, it's why I unsubscribed to his newsletter).
 

Nipo

Member
It's less about the book and more about gaf here. This thread is downright shameful. The epitome of privilege. Trump is destroying lives and everyone is shitting on each other. It's unfortunately typical of the left and really depressing.

What would you recommend we do to stop Trump from destroying lives? Hopefully the DNC realizes the huge mistakes it made but there really isn't muhc we can do until midterms.
 
Careful with tossing aside the deep south as a "republican stronghold" and therefore not being a big deal for democrats. We should remember about state senate seats, assembly, representatives, secretary of state, governor, and a whole range of government positions in which elections are held for. Sure in presidential politics states like Mississippi and Alabama are crazy red, but there are individual pockets of blue in some parts of the state that Democrats should do what they can to defend, and make attempts at expanding the little blue spots that exist in an otherwise red sea.
 
"im upset that my opponent ran a campaign against me in the primary. Should Have just let me win"

He and his surrogates and his bigger supporters in the media ran a successful bomb throwing campaign and a shitty electoral campaign. Which is why his hardcore supporters believe in a conspiracy theory of nationwide campaign rigging by an organization they also think is incredibly incompetent rather than the reality that he got blown out in a landslide by actual voters.

And the bomb throwing campaign didn't end after the Primary and is still ongoing.
 

kamspy

Member
What would you recommend we do to stop Trump from destroying lives? Hopefully the DNC realizes the huge mistakes it made but there really isn't muhc we can do until midterms.

You're asking a business to go out of business.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
It's not "the primaries." It's a battle between the progressive wing and the establishment wing of the Democratic Party, and it won't end until one of them has the presidency.

But, that's like a battle between 2 types of oranges.

There is so little difference between the policy goals.
 

Nipo

Member
Thank you for getting it completely wrong. I mean shit Bernie said ended up word for word in Trump ads and rallies. Really the point is that no matter what Hillary did it was always "look at this bitch eating crackers" to a percentage of folks coupled with Bernie staying in past the point he had no chance of winning AND still attacking her. I'm fine he stayed in, it's him keeping his word. But when he had no chance other than something catastrophic happening to Hillary, he should have cut the shit with attacks (I blame that goateed bald dude who kept sending out all the fundraiser emails the most for this, it's why I unsubscribed to his newsletter).

So Bernie's criticisms were effective and resonated with voters. Of course Trump took them. Your whole post sounds a lot like Bernie shouldn't have criticized her and let her win because the criticisms were too good and made her look bad.
 

chekhonte

Member
I for one am looking forward to a fragmented democratic party coming into the 2020 elections. Let's make this election a soul level 1 run against Ornstien and Smough
 

djkimothy

Member
She's right. It was a shame elements within the Democratic party were so toxic. I like Bernie but the guy went too far with his rhetoric.
 
What would you recommend we do to stop Trump from destroying lives? Hopefully the DNC realizes the huge mistakes it made but there really isn't muhc we can do until midterms.

The way the talk in here is framed just leads to sour grapes and apathy. I don't really see any of this as constructive discussion and more just shit flinging. I really hope gaf doesn't represent the rest of the Democratic base, because if it does, we're screwed

People are STILL fighting over who lost the best. Sigh.
 
So Bernie's criticisms were effective and resonated with voters. Of course Trump took them. Your whole post sounds a lot like Bernie shouldn't have criticized her and let her win because the criticisms were too good and made her look bad.

Last few sentences I explained that it was because he kept up the attacks and in some cases escalated AFTER super Tuesday when it was a guarantee he would NOT get the nomination but for intervention of God. That is where I take umbrage.

Edit: And yes I know he eventually said "vote for her" but he took too long on that AND I think back to the DNC where his supporters were crying and upset he went on so late, thinking it a snub, but not realizing the time slot was an honor.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Democrats in the South don't consider abortion rights to be of any concern.

Yes, there's a difference between Southern Democrats and the rest of the country.

They don't show up, they don't care, they don't matter. Yes I said it. When there's enough of them to hit 40% vote in the state, sure, THEN I'll care.

Stop trying to win fucking Arksansas, Texas, and Mississippi. Start trying to win Wisconsin and Michigan. This isn't new ideas. This is looking at a goddamn map and knowing where to prioritize resources.

What difference does it matter how popular someone is in the South, when the whole fucking region is redwash. Like, seriously, 90% votes for R. It doesn't matter that you got 9% of the remaining 10% it doesn't matter a damn bit.

Considering the racial makeup of Southern Democrats, this is more than just a little racist.
 

cheezcake

Member
She's right. It was a shame elements within the Democratic party were so toxic. I like Bernie but the guy went too far with his rhetoric.

Clinton did far, far worse to Obama in '08

Which makes this thing just seem incredibly petty and disingenuous, she knows the game, she got dirty as fuck in her previous primary, and now she's playing the victim and trying to take the high ground.

But seriously I shouldn't care and neither should anyone. Hillary Clinton is not an important person anymore, she's entirely irrelevant.
 

kamspy

Member
Do people realize that just a few terms ago Bill Clinton was campaigning on cracking down on illegal aliens? Can we expect the entire party to pivot on a dime like the leadership did?
 
Do people realize that just a few terms ago Bill Clinton was campaigning on cracking down on illegal aliens? Can we expect the entire party to pivot on a dime like the leadership did?

We can't expect the left to realize it's a two party system and the only way to "win" is to ensure the Republicans lose even AFTER this election. So no.
 

Brinbe

Member
As always, she's right. But that won't stop people from pitching a fit and calling her every name under the sun. Oh well, have fun with Trump and your endless purity tests.
 

Nipo

Member
The way the talk in here is framed just leads to sour grapes and apathy. I don't really see any of this as constructive discussion and more just shit flinging. I really hope gaf doesn't represent the rest of the Democratic base, because if it does, we're screwed

People are STILL fighting over who lost the best. Sigh.

I get it sucks to see what looks like people just flinging shit at each other (which i fully admit i'm occasionally guilty of). I'd argue that people fighting for the direction of the party is better than tuning out of politics completely as long as they for for the liberal candidate most likely to win in the midterms.

Fight tooth and nail to shape party policy now then turn up to vote.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom